Effect of pilates training on pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

Junzhen Huang, Hun-Young Park
{"title":"Effect of pilates training on pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Junzhen Huang,&nbsp;Hun-Young Park","doi":"10.20463/pan.2023.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis study evaluated the effects of Pilates on pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six electronic databases were searched between January 2012 and December 2022. From these databases, only randomized controlled trials were selected. The criteria for assessing methodological quality using the PEDro scale were selected. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool RoB 2.0. Additionally, the primary outcomes were pain and disability in this analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The corresponding results confirmed that Pilates training led to a significant improvement in pain (Visual Analog Scale: weighted mean difference = -29.38, 95% confidence interval, -33.24 to -25.52, I² value = 56.70%; Pain Numerical Rating Scale: weighted mean difference = -2.12, 95% confidence interval, -2.54 to -1.69, I² value = 0.00%) and disability (Roland- Morris Disability Index: weighted mean difference = -4.73, 95% confidence interval, -5.45 to -4.01, I² value = 41.79%). Six months after completion of Pilates training, the improvement in pain (Pain Numerical Rating Scale: weighted mean difference = -1.67, 95% confidence interval, -2.03 to -1.32, I² value = 0.00%) and disability (Roland-Morris Disability Index: weighted mean difference = -4.24, 95% confidence interval, -5.39 to -3.09, I² value = 52.79%) was maintained.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pilates training may be an effective strategy to improve pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":74444,"journal":{"name":"Physical activity and nutrition","volume":"27 1","pages":"16-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/60/36/pan-2023-0003.PMC10164513.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical activity and nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20463/pan.2023.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analysis study evaluated the effects of Pilates on pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain.

Methods: Six electronic databases were searched between January 2012 and December 2022. From these databases, only randomized controlled trials were selected. The criteria for assessing methodological quality using the PEDro scale were selected. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool RoB 2.0. Additionally, the primary outcomes were pain and disability in this analysis.

Results: The corresponding results confirmed that Pilates training led to a significant improvement in pain (Visual Analog Scale: weighted mean difference = -29.38, 95% confidence interval, -33.24 to -25.52, I² value = 56.70%; Pain Numerical Rating Scale: weighted mean difference = -2.12, 95% confidence interval, -2.54 to -1.69, I² value = 0.00%) and disability (Roland- Morris Disability Index: weighted mean difference = -4.73, 95% confidence interval, -5.45 to -4.01, I² value = 41.79%). Six months after completion of Pilates training, the improvement in pain (Pain Numerical Rating Scale: weighted mean difference = -1.67, 95% confidence interval, -2.03 to -1.32, I² value = 0.00%) and disability (Roland-Morris Disability Index: weighted mean difference = -4.24, 95% confidence interval, -5.39 to -3.09, I² value = 52.79%) was maintained.

Conclusion: Pilates training may be an effective strategy to improve pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普拉提训练对慢性腰痛患者疼痛和残疾的影响:基于随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本系统回顾和荟萃分析研究评估了普拉提对慢性腰痛患者疼痛和残疾的影响。方法:检索2012年1月- 2022年12月6个电子数据库。从这些数据库中,只选择了随机对照试验。选择了使用PEDro量表评估方法学质量的标准。使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具RoB 2.0评估偏倚风险。此外,在本分析中,主要结局是疼痛和残疾。结果:相应的结果证实普拉提训练导致疼痛显著改善(视觉模拟量表:加权平均差= -29.38,95%置信区间,-33.24 ~ -25.52,I²值= 56.70%;疼痛数值评定量表:加权平均差值= -2.12,95%置信区间,-2.54 ~ -1.69,I²值= 0.00%)和残疾(Roland- Morris残疾指数:加权平均差值= -4.73,95%置信区间,-5.45 ~ -4.01,I²值= 41.79%)。完成普拉提训练6个月后,疼痛(疼痛数值评定量表:加权平均差值= -1.67,95%置信区间,-2.03 ~ -1.32,I²值= 0.00%)和残疾(Roland-Morris残疾指数:加权平均差值= -4.24,95%置信区间,-5.39 ~ -3.09,I²值= 52.79%)的改善保持不变。结论:普拉提训练可能是改善慢性腰痛患者疼痛和残疾的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A scoping review of rapid weight loss in judo athletes: prevalence, magnitude, effects on performance, risks, and recommendations. Effects of fermented oyster extract supplementation on free fatty acid and liver enzymes in older women with obesity. Effects of wearing a KF94 face mask on performance, perceptual parameters, and physiological responses during resistance exercise. Intra-rater and test-retest reliability of videography observation method to check diversion time in Fukuda step test among college going students. Physical activity and nutrient intake levels according to grip strength among single-household elderly in Korea: data from 2014 and 2019 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1