Successful prioritisation of inguinal herniotomies in children during the COVID-19 pandemic to minimise emergency presentations.

IF 0.4 Q4 PEDIATRICS Annals of Pediatric Surgery Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s43159-023-00243-1
Mahmoud Marei Marei, Ahmed Sobhy Hassan, Mohamed Kamel, Aiden Moore, Olugbenga Michael Aworanti
{"title":"Successful prioritisation of inguinal herniotomies in children during the COVID-19 pandemic to minimise emergency presentations.","authors":"Mahmoud Marei Marei,&nbsp;Ahmed Sobhy Hassan,&nbsp;Mohamed Kamel,&nbsp;Aiden Moore,&nbsp;Olugbenga Michael Aworanti","doi":"10.1186/s43159-023-00243-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disrupted the delivery of elective surgery in children. We introduced guidance to mitigate this impact. By reviewing the outcomes for inguinal herniotomies, we aimed to determine if this guidance has enabled us to prevent an increase in the elective surgery wait time and therefore the need for emergency surgery for incarcerated hernias. This report aims to share our learnt lessons about responding to a crisis limiting accessibility to elective surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of all elective and emergency herniotomies performed between April 1 and September 30, 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and the same period in 2020 (post-COVID-19). We compared the data on wait time from referral to clinic review/elective surgery and incarceration rates. During the study period in 2019, 76 elective herniotomies were performed compared to 46 in 2020. We did not observe a simultaneous increase in emergency herniotomies in 2020 (27 [2020] vs 25 [2019], OR [95% CI] = 1.53 [0.79-2.9]; <i>p</i> = 0.2). The median time from referral to elective surgery in 2019 compared to 2020 did not differ (56 vs 59 days, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.61). In 2020, 72% of children that required emergency surgery had not been previously referred to our service and the median age (interquartile range) at which they presented with an incarcerated hernia was 2.8 months (2.1-13.7 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By adhering to local guidelines for resumption of elective activity, the pandemic did not result in children waiting longer to be seen by a surgeon for a suspected inguinal hernia. As a result, we did not perform more emergency herniotomies. Urgent prioritisation of hernias in infants, from birth up to 3 months old, was a beneficial strategy. Public health education on childhood hernias will improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43159-023-00243-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":43372,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pediatric Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10149152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43159-023-00243-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disrupted the delivery of elective surgery in children. We introduced guidance to mitigate this impact. By reviewing the outcomes for inguinal herniotomies, we aimed to determine if this guidance has enabled us to prevent an increase in the elective surgery wait time and therefore the need for emergency surgery for incarcerated hernias. This report aims to share our learnt lessons about responding to a crisis limiting accessibility to elective surgery.

Results: We performed a retrospective review of all elective and emergency herniotomies performed between April 1 and September 30, 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and the same period in 2020 (post-COVID-19). We compared the data on wait time from referral to clinic review/elective surgery and incarceration rates. During the study period in 2019, 76 elective herniotomies were performed compared to 46 in 2020. We did not observe a simultaneous increase in emergency herniotomies in 2020 (27 [2020] vs 25 [2019], OR [95% CI] = 1.53 [0.79-2.9]; p = 0.2). The median time from referral to elective surgery in 2019 compared to 2020 did not differ (56 vs 59 days, respectively; p = 0.61). In 2020, 72% of children that required emergency surgery had not been previously referred to our service and the median age (interquartile range) at which they presented with an incarcerated hernia was 2.8 months (2.1-13.7 months).

Conclusion: By adhering to local guidelines for resumption of elective activity, the pandemic did not result in children waiting longer to be seen by a surgeon for a suspected inguinal hernia. As a result, we did not perform more emergency herniotomies. Urgent prioritisation of hernias in infants, from birth up to 3 months old, was a beneficial strategy. Public health education on childhood hernias will improve outcomes.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43159-023-00243-1.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,成功优先为儿童进行腹股沟疝切开术,以尽量减少紧急情况。
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)影响了儿童择期手术的顺利进行。我们引入了指南来减轻这种影响。通过回顾腹股沟疝切开术的结果,我们旨在确定该指南是否使我们能够防止选择性手术等待时间的增加,从而减少对嵌顿疝的紧急手术需求。本报告旨在分享我们在应对限制选择性手术可及性的危机方面的经验教训。结果:我们对2019年4月1日至9月30日(covid -19前)和2020年同期(covid -19后)进行的所有选择性和紧急疝切开术进行了回顾性分析。我们比较了从转诊到门诊复查/选择性手术的等待时间和监禁率的数据。在2019年的研究期间,进行了76例选择性疝切开术,而2020年为46例。我们没有观察到2020年急诊疝切开术同时增加(27例[2020]vs 25例[2019],OR [95% CI] = 1.53 [0.79-2.9];p = 0.2)。2019年与2020年相比,从转诊到择期手术的中位时间没有差异(分别为56天和59天;p = 0.61)。在2020年,72%需要紧急手术的儿童以前没有被转介到我们的服务,他们表现为嵌顿疝的中位年龄(四分位数范围)为2.8个月(2.1-13.7个月)。结论:通过遵守恢复选择性活动的当地指导方针,大流行并未导致儿童因怀疑腹股沟疝而等待外科医生更长时间。因此,我们没有进行更多的急诊疝切开术。从出生到3个月大的婴儿,紧急优先处理疝气是一种有益的策略。关于儿童疝气的公共卫生教育将改善结果。补充资料:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1186/s43159-023-00243-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Validation of the Indonesian version of the thyroid cancer-specific quality of life as a tool to assess the quality of life among pediatric thyroid cancer patients Non-hypertrophic gastric outlet obstruction in the paediatric population: a case series with focus on management Safety and efficacy of central line removal by guidewire extraction technique in children Epidemiologic factors associated with neonatal bowel perforations in Uganda: experience from a single tertiary referral hospital Management of a double H-type tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1