Repetitive thought, cognition, and systemic inflammation in the midlife in the United States study.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology & Health Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-27 DOI:10.1080/08870446.2022.2092104
Elana M Gloger, Suzanne C Segerstrom
{"title":"Repetitive thought, cognition, and systemic inflammation in the midlife in the United States study.","authors":"Elana M Gloger, Suzanne C Segerstrom","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2022.2092104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Poor cognition increases risk for negative health outcomes, and this may be explained by associations with systemic inflammation. Previously, amount of repetitive thought (Total RT) interacted with IQ to predict interleukin-6 (IL-6) in older adults. This study continued the investigation of repetitive thought (RT) as an element involved in the effect of cognition on inflammation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Participants (<i>N</i> = 164) came from the Midlife in the United States Refresher project (M<sub>age</sub> = 45.33, SD = 11.51, ranges = 25-74; 48.2% female; 85% Caucasian). Cognition was assessed via telephone, inflammatory biomarkers (IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), and tumour-necrosis factor-alpha (TNF- α)) analysed after blood draw, and RT derived from daily diary data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cognition significantly interacted with RT valence (<i>p</i> = .009) to explain CRP after covariate adjustment. Better cognition and more negative RT valence was associated with lower CRP (<i>β</i> = -0.190 [-.387, .008]). Worse cognition and more negative RT valence was associated with higher CRP (<i>β</i> = 0.133 [-.031, .297]). No significant effects were found for IL-6 or TNF-α.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RT may interact with cognition to affect different inflammatory biomarkers. Those with worse cognition may benefit more from skills related to regulating thought than those with better cognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"651-669"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2022.2092104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Poor cognition increases risk for negative health outcomes, and this may be explained by associations with systemic inflammation. Previously, amount of repetitive thought (Total RT) interacted with IQ to predict interleukin-6 (IL-6) in older adults. This study continued the investigation of repetitive thought (RT) as an element involved in the effect of cognition on inflammation.

Design: Participants (N = 164) came from the Midlife in the United States Refresher project (Mage = 45.33, SD = 11.51, ranges = 25-74; 48.2% female; 85% Caucasian). Cognition was assessed via telephone, inflammatory biomarkers (IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), and tumour-necrosis factor-alpha (TNF- α)) analysed after blood draw, and RT derived from daily diary data.

Results: Cognition significantly interacted with RT valence (p = .009) to explain CRP after covariate adjustment. Better cognition and more negative RT valence was associated with lower CRP (β = -0.190 [-.387, .008]). Worse cognition and more negative RT valence was associated with higher CRP (β = 0.133 [-.031, .297]). No significant effects were found for IL-6 or TNF-α.

Conclusion: RT may interact with cognition to affect different inflammatory biomarkers. Those with worse cognition may benefit more from skills related to regulating thought than those with better cognition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国中年研究中的重复思维、认知和全身炎症。
目的认知能力差会增加不良健康后果的风险,这可能与全身炎症有关。此前,重复思维量(Total RT)与智商相互作用,可预测老年人的白细胞介素-6(IL-6)。本研究继续调查重复思维(RT)作为认知对炎症影响的一个因素:参与者(N = 164)来自美国中年进修项目(年龄 = 45.33,SD = 11.51,范围 = 25-74;48.2% 为女性;85% 为白种人)。认知能力通过电话进行评估,炎症生物标志物(IL-6、C反应蛋白(CRP)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF- α))在抽血后进行分析,RT来自每日日记数据:结果:经协变量调整后,认知与RT价显著交互作用(p = .009),可解释CRP。较好的认知能力和较消极的 RT 价态与较低的 CRP 相关(β = -0.190 [-.387, .008])。较差的认知能力和更消极的 RT 价态与较高的 CRP 相关(β = 0.133 [-.031, .297])。IL-6和TNF-α均无明显影响:RT可能与认知能力相互作用,影响不同的炎症生物标志物。与认知能力较好的人相比,认知能力较差的人可能从与调节思维相关的技能中获益更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
期刊最新文献
Information seeking and subsequent affective well-being in Chinese young adults: the mediating effects of worry. Embodiment-based self-management for Israeli breast cancer survivors after mind-body therapy. Drinker's own drinking, experience of alcohol-related harms, and concern for drinking predict drinker's attitudes towards non-drinkers. Global self-esteem and degree of overweight/obesity: are they linked in the adult population? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Too much information! When job resources become job demands, producing a curvilinear relationship between informational social support and creativity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1