Influence of Dispositional Optimism on Ethically Salient Research Perspectives: A Pilot Study

Q2 Social Sciences Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI:10.1002/eahr.500126
Jane Paik Kim, Sangeeta Mondal, Tenzin Tsungmey, Katie Ryan, Laura B. Dunn, Laura Weiss Roberts
{"title":"Influence of Dispositional Optimism on Ethically Salient Research Perspectives: A Pilot Study","authors":"Jane Paik Kim,&nbsp;Sangeeta Mondal,&nbsp;Tenzin Tsungmey,&nbsp;Katie Ryan,&nbsp;Laura B. Dunn,&nbsp;Laura Weiss Roberts","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Research participants should be drawn as fairly as possible from the potential volunteer population. Underlying personality traits are underexplored as factors influencing research decision-making. Dispositional optimism, known to affect coping, physical health, and psychological well-being, has been minimally studied with respect to research-related attitudes. We conducted an exploratory, online survey with 151 individuals (with self-reported mental illness [n = 50], physical illness [n = 51], or neither [n = 50]) recruited via MTurk. We evaluated associations between dispositional optimism (assessed with the Life Orientation Test—Revised) and general research attitudes, perceived protectiveness of five research safeguards, and willingness to participate in research using safeguards. Strongly optimistic respondents expressed more positive research attitudes and perceived four safeguards as more positively influencing willingness to participate. Optimism was positively associated with expressed willingness to participate in clinical research. Our findings add to a limited literature on the influence of individual traits on ethically salient research perspectives.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 3","pages":"12-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.500126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research participants should be drawn as fairly as possible from the potential volunteer population. Underlying personality traits are underexplored as factors influencing research decision-making. Dispositional optimism, known to affect coping, physical health, and psychological well-being, has been minimally studied with respect to research-related attitudes. We conducted an exploratory, online survey with 151 individuals (with self-reported mental illness [n = 50], physical illness [n = 51], or neither [n = 50]) recruited via MTurk. We evaluated associations between dispositional optimism (assessed with the Life Orientation Test—Revised) and general research attitudes, perceived protectiveness of five research safeguards, and willingness to participate in research using safeguards. Strongly optimistic respondents expressed more positive research attitudes and perceived four safeguards as more positively influencing willingness to participate. Optimism was positively associated with expressed willingness to participate in clinical research. Our findings add to a limited literature on the influence of individual traits on ethically salient research perspectives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性格乐观对伦理显著性研究视角的影响:一项初步研究
研究参与者应该尽可能公平地从潜在的志愿者人群中挑选出来。潜在的人格特质作为影响研究决策的因素尚未得到充分的探讨。众所周知,性格乐观会影响应对、身体健康和心理健康,但对与研究相关的态度的研究很少。我们对通过MTurk招募的151人(自我报告有精神疾病[n = 50],身体疾病[n = 51],或两者都没有[n = 50])进行了一项探索性在线调查。我们评估了性格乐观(用修订后的生活取向测试评估)与一般研究态度、五种研究保障措施的感知保护程度以及参与使用保障措施的研究意愿之间的关系。强烈乐观的受访者表达了更积极的研究态度,并认为四个保障措施更积极地影响了参与意愿。乐观与参与临床研究的意愿呈正相关。我们的发现补充了关于个体特征对伦理突出研究视角影响的有限文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics & human research
Ethics & human research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Prospect of Artificial Intelligence-Supported Ethics Review Ethical Issues Faced by Data Monitoring Committees: Results from an Exploratory Qualitative Study The Ethical Case for Decentralized Clinical Trials The European Health Data Space as a Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1