Validation of the Turkish version of the Lewy body composite risk score.

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2023.2212393
Feyza Mutlay, Derya Kaya, Esra Ates Bulut, Burcu Akpınar Söylemez, Mehmet Selman Öntan, Ahmet Turan Isık
{"title":"Validation of the Turkish version of the Lewy body composite risk score.","authors":"Feyza Mutlay, Derya Kaya, Esra Ates Bulut, Burcu Akpınar Söylemez, Mehmet Selman Öntan, Ahmet Turan Isık","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2023.2212393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Lewy Body Composite Risk Score (LBCRS) has been developed to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis attributable to Lewy body pathology outside of specialty centers. We aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the LBCRS in patients with dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) and investigate the discriminative power of the test in Turkish patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and DLB, and control group. The sample population (n = 512) comprised DLB (n = 113), DLB-Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)(n = 12), AD (n = 42), AD-MCI (n = 21), and control group (n = 324). A significant group difference was observed in the Turkish version of the LBCRS scores of the five groups (<i>p</i> < .001). The Cronbach's α value was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.799-0.868). The test-retest reliability score of the scale was r = 0.94 and <i>p</i> < .001. The subscales of the LBCRS (motor and nonmotor subdomains of the disease) were determined to explain 65.961% of the total variance with an eigenvalue >1. In patients with DLB, the cutoff score of ≥3 showed sensitivity (92%) and specificity (81%) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.883, 95% CI: 0.815-0.951), <i>p</i> < .001) compared with the AD. Compared to the control group, the cutoff score of ≥3 showed a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 97% (AUC = 0.994, 95% CI: 0.989-0.999, <i>p</i> < .001). The Turkish version of LBCRS permits accurate diagnosis of DLB with high sensitivity and specificity. Also, it can be useful to inform the caregivers regarding the course of the disease during the follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"768-774"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2023.2212393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Lewy Body Composite Risk Score (LBCRS) has been developed to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis attributable to Lewy body pathology outside of specialty centers. We aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the LBCRS in patients with dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) and investigate the discriminative power of the test in Turkish patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and DLB, and control group. The sample population (n = 512) comprised DLB (n = 113), DLB-Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)(n = 12), AD (n = 42), AD-MCI (n = 21), and control group (n = 324). A significant group difference was observed in the Turkish version of the LBCRS scores of the five groups (p < .001). The Cronbach's α value was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.799-0.868). The test-retest reliability score of the scale was r = 0.94 and p < .001. The subscales of the LBCRS (motor and nonmotor subdomains of the disease) were determined to explain 65.961% of the total variance with an eigenvalue >1. In patients with DLB, the cutoff score of ≥3 showed sensitivity (92%) and specificity (81%) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.883, 95% CI: 0.815-0.951), p < .001) compared with the AD. Compared to the control group, the cutoff score of ≥3 showed a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 97% (AUC = 0.994, 95% CI: 0.989-0.999, p < .001). The Turkish version of LBCRS permits accurate diagnosis of DLB with high sensitivity and specificity. Also, it can be useful to inform the caregivers regarding the course of the disease during the follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证土耳其版本的路易体综合风险评分。
路易体复合风险评分(LBCRS)的开发是为了提高在专业中心之外路易体病理诊断的敏感性和特异性。我们的目的是评估土耳其版LBCRS在伴路易体痴呆(DLB)患者中的效度和信度,并研究该测试在伴路易体痴呆(AD)和DLB的土耳其患者以及对照组中的判别能力。样本群体(n = 512)包括DLB (n = 113)、DLB-轻度认知障碍(MCI)(n = 12)、AD (n = 42)、AD-轻度认知障碍(n = 21)和对照组(n = 324)。五组患者土耳其语版LBCRS评分差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。在DLB患者中,截止评分≥3分显示敏感性(92%)和特异性(81%)(曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.883, 95% CI: 0.815-0.951)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
From injury to inference: Neuropsychological reasoning across divergent mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) criteria. Normative data for the Comic-Strip Task in the French-Quebec population aged 50 and over. Evaluating interval-based indices from tests of semantic verbal fluency for mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Correlation of Montreal Cognitive Assessment with Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 in adult persons with epilepsy. Validation and standardization of the Persian version of the Kimberley indigenous cognitive Assessment (KICA-cog) for detecting major and mild cognitive impairment in low-literate and illiterate Iranian adults aged 55 and above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1