Reliability, structure, and validity of module I (personality functioning) of the Structured Clinical Interview for the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders (SCID-5-AMPD-I).

Ludwig Ohse, Johannes Zimmermann, André Kerber, Leonie Kampe, Jil Mohr, Julia Kendlbacher, Oliver Busch, Michael Rentrop, Susanne Hörz-Sagstetter
{"title":"Reliability, structure, and validity of module I (personality functioning) of the Structured Clinical Interview for the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders (SCID-5-AMPD-I).","authors":"Ludwig Ohse,&nbsp;Johannes Zimmermann,&nbsp;André Kerber,&nbsp;Leonie Kampe,&nbsp;Jil Mohr,&nbsp;Julia Kendlbacher,&nbsp;Oliver Busch,&nbsp;Michael Rentrop,&nbsp;Susanne Hörz-Sagstetter","doi":"10.1037/per0000576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) of the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5),</i> a moderate or greater impairment in personality functioning is the essential criterion for a personality disorder diagnosis. Personality functioning is operationalized in the Level of Personality Functioning Scale via 4 domains (identity, self-direction, empathy, and intimacy) and 2 higher order dimensions (self and interpersonal functioning). The current study examined the reliability (interrater, test-retest), structure, and validity (convergent, discriminant, and incremental) of the Structured Clinical Interview for the AMPD-Module I (SCID-5-AMPD-I). A clinical sample (<i>n</i> = 121) completed the SCID-5-AMPD-I, along with an interview for <i>DSM</i>-<i>5</i> Section II personality disorders and self-reports for personality pathology (personality functioning, personality organization, personality structure, and pathological personality traits) and other forms of psychopathology (depression, anxiety, somatization, and general disability). Interrater and test-retest reliability was excellent for overall personality functioning, the higher order dimensions, and the domains, except for the empathy domain in the test-retest condition. Factor analyses suggest that personality functioning is an essentially unidimensional construct. Personality functioning demonstrated high convergence with other forms of personality pathology and showed good discriminant validity in relation to depression, anxiety, and somatization but not in relation to the broader construct of general disability. Personality functioning (Criterion A) showed incremental validity over pathological personality traits (Criterion B) in predicting interview-assessed DSM-5 Section II personality disorders but not in predicting self-reported personality and general psychopathology. The present study suggests that the SCID-5-AMPD-I is a viable measure for personality functioning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":"14 3","pages":"287-299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

According to the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), a moderate or greater impairment in personality functioning is the essential criterion for a personality disorder diagnosis. Personality functioning is operationalized in the Level of Personality Functioning Scale via 4 domains (identity, self-direction, empathy, and intimacy) and 2 higher order dimensions (self and interpersonal functioning). The current study examined the reliability (interrater, test-retest), structure, and validity (convergent, discriminant, and incremental) of the Structured Clinical Interview for the AMPD-Module I (SCID-5-AMPD-I). A clinical sample (n = 121) completed the SCID-5-AMPD-I, along with an interview for DSM-5 Section II personality disorders and self-reports for personality pathology (personality functioning, personality organization, personality structure, and pathological personality traits) and other forms of psychopathology (depression, anxiety, somatization, and general disability). Interrater and test-retest reliability was excellent for overall personality functioning, the higher order dimensions, and the domains, except for the empathy domain in the test-retest condition. Factor analyses suggest that personality functioning is an essentially unidimensional construct. Personality functioning demonstrated high convergence with other forms of personality pathology and showed good discriminant validity in relation to depression, anxiety, and somatization but not in relation to the broader construct of general disability. Personality functioning (Criterion A) showed incremental validity over pathological personality traits (Criterion B) in predicting interview-assessed DSM-5 Section II personality disorders but not in predicting self-reported personality and general psychopathology. The present study suggests that the SCID-5-AMPD-I is a viable measure for personality functioning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DSM-5人格障碍替代模型(SCID-5-AMPD-I)结构化临床访谈模块I(人格功能)的信度、结构和效度
根据《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)的人格障碍替代模型(AMPD),中度或更严重的人格功能损害是人格障碍诊断的基本标准。人格功能在人格功能水平量表中通过4个维度(身份、自我导向、共情和亲密)和2个更高维度(自我和人际功能)来运作。本研究检验了AMPD-Module I (SCID-5-AMPD-I)的结构化临床访谈的信度(interrater, test-retest)、结构和效度(收敛、判别和增量)。临床样本(n = 121)完成了SCID-5-AMPD-I,并对DSM-5第II部分人格障碍进行了访谈,并对人格病理(人格功能、人格组织、人格结构和病态人格特征)和其他形式的精神病理(抑郁、焦虑、躯体化和一般残疾)进行了自我报告。重测条件下,除共情领域外,整体人格功能、高阶维度、各领域的被测者信度和重测信度均极好。因素分析表明,人格功能本质上是一个单向度的结构。人格功能与其他形式的人格病理表现出高度的趋同,在抑郁、焦虑和躯体化方面表现出良好的判别效度,但与一般残疾的更广泛的结构无关。人格功能(标准A)在预测访谈评估的DSM-5第二节人格障碍方面比病理人格特征(标准B)显示出递增的效度,但在预测自我报告的人格和一般精神病理方面则没有。目前的研究表明,SCID-5-AMPD-I是一种可行的人格功能测量方法。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An exploratory study on disinhibition and interpersonal outcomes in daily life. The association between minority stressors, intraminority stressors, and borderline personality disorder symptomatology among sexual minority men. Advancing understanding of the relation between criterion a of the alternative model for personality disorders and hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology: Insights from an external validity analysis. Negative affect and pain catastrophizing link borderline personality disorder to pain: Replicating and extending the borderline personality disorder-pain association. First psychometric evaluation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 in adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1