Can omalizumab be an alternative treatment for non-atopic severe asthma? A real-life experience with omalizumab.

IF 0.7 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.5578/tt.20239904
Dane Ediger, Fatma Esra Günaydın, Müge Erbay, Gülseren Pekbak
{"title":"Can omalizumab be an alternative treatment for non-atopic severe asthma? A real-life experience with omalizumab.","authors":"Dane Ediger, Fatma Esra Günaydın, Müge Erbay, Gülseren Pekbak","doi":"10.5578/tt.20239904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, has largely demonstrated its efficacy in severe allergic asthma. There are limited data about the effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with non-atopic severe persistent asthma. In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of omalizumab in patients with non-atopic severe asthma and compare the data obtained with those in patients with allergic severe asthma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was an observational, retrospective, tertiary single-center study that assessed and compared the clinical outcome of adult patients with severe asthma (165 atopic and 41 non-atopic) who have been on omalizumab for one year or longer between January 2008 and January 2020. Effectiveness was assessed by considering symptom scores (GINA symptom control score), daily systemic corticosteroids (SCS) dosage, blood eosinophil counts, pulmonary function, and number of severe exacerbations and hospitalizations within the last one year.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Omalizumab exhibited significant improvement in the clinical status of non-atopic asthma patients as measured by GINA symptom score [decreased from 3.77 ± 0.63 to 1.36 ± 1.27 (p<0.001)], the number of emergency room visits for asthma [decreased from 11.25 ± 14.69 to 0.25 ± 0.55 (p<0.001)], and the number of hospitalizations [decreased from 1.17 ± 2.87 to 0.14 ± 0.36 (p= 0.036)]. These results were not significantly different from those obtained in allergic asthma patients. FEV1 improved significantly from 2.08 ± 0.86 to 2.14 ± 0.84 (p= 0.041) and oral corticosteroid doses decreased significantly from 1.67 ± 7.49 to 0.46 ± 2.74 (p= 0.015) in the only atopic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Omalizumab, which is a proven and effective treatment option for allergic asthma, may also be an efficacious alternative option in non-atopic severe asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":45521,"journal":{"name":"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10795235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.20239904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, has largely demonstrated its efficacy in severe allergic asthma. There are limited data about the effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with non-atopic severe persistent asthma. In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of omalizumab in patients with non-atopic severe asthma and compare the data obtained with those in patients with allergic severe asthma.

Materials and methods: This study was an observational, retrospective, tertiary single-center study that assessed and compared the clinical outcome of adult patients with severe asthma (165 atopic and 41 non-atopic) who have been on omalizumab for one year or longer between January 2008 and January 2020. Effectiveness was assessed by considering symptom scores (GINA symptom control score), daily systemic corticosteroids (SCS) dosage, blood eosinophil counts, pulmonary function, and number of severe exacerbations and hospitalizations within the last one year.

Result: Omalizumab exhibited significant improvement in the clinical status of non-atopic asthma patients as measured by GINA symptom score [decreased from 3.77 ± 0.63 to 1.36 ± 1.27 (p<0.001)], the number of emergency room visits for asthma [decreased from 11.25 ± 14.69 to 0.25 ± 0.55 (p<0.001)], and the number of hospitalizations [decreased from 1.17 ± 2.87 to 0.14 ± 0.36 (p= 0.036)]. These results were not significantly different from those obtained in allergic asthma patients. FEV1 improved significantly from 2.08 ± 0.86 to 2.14 ± 0.84 (p= 0.041) and oral corticosteroid doses decreased significantly from 1.67 ± 7.49 to 0.46 ± 2.74 (p= 0.015) in the only atopic group.

Conclusions: Omalizumab, which is a proven and effective treatment option for allergic asthma, may also be an efficacious alternative option in non-atopic severe asthma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥马珠单抗可以作为非变应性重症哮喘的替代治疗方法吗?使用奥马珠单抗的真实体验。
简介奥马珠单抗是一种人源化单克隆抗 IgE 抗体,已在很大程度上证明了其对严重过敏性哮喘的疗效。有关奥马珠单抗对非变应性严重持续性哮喘患者疗效的数据有限。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定奥马珠单抗对非变应性重症哮喘患者的疗效,并将获得的数据与过敏性重症哮喘患者的数据进行比较:本研究是一项观察性、回顾性、三级单中心研究,评估并比较了 2008 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月期间使用奥马珠单抗一年或更长时间的成年重症哮喘患者(165 名特应性患者和 41 名非特应性患者)的临床疗效。评估疗效时考虑了症状评分(GINA症状控制评分)、每日全身皮质类固醇(SCS)用量、血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数、肺功能以及过去一年内严重恶化和住院次数:结果:根据 GINA 症状评分(从 3.77 ± 0.63 降至 1.36 ± 1.27(p)),奥马珠单抗能显著改善非变应性哮喘患者的临床状况:奥马珠单抗是治疗过敏性哮喘的一种行之有效的方法,也可能是治疗非变应性重症哮喘的一种有效替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
A patient with widespread skin lesions presenting with massive pleural effusion. A perspective on the scope of videoconferencing-based telemedicine in respiratory diseases outpatient clinic. Analysis of one-year follow-up results and treatment costs of patients with PTE in a tertiary care center. Analysis of post-COVID symptoms and predisposing factors for chronic post-COVID syndrome. Characteristics of adverse reactions due to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy applied between 2011-2021: Single center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1