Importance of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1515/jbcpp-2023-0040
Purwo Sri Rejeki, Bendix Samarta Witarto, Andro Pramana Witarto, Salsabila Nabilah Rifdah, Ifan Ali Wafa, Dita Mega Utami, Nabilah Izzatunnisa, Citrawati Dyah Kencono Wungu, Siti Khaerunnisa, Sakina, Nur Ezza Fazleen Mohd Fathil
{"title":"Importance of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Purwo Sri Rejeki,&nbsp;Bendix Samarta Witarto,&nbsp;Andro Pramana Witarto,&nbsp;Salsabila Nabilah Rifdah,&nbsp;Ifan Ali Wafa,&nbsp;Dita Mega Utami,&nbsp;Nabilah Izzatunnisa,&nbsp;Citrawati Dyah Kencono Wungu,&nbsp;Siti Khaerunnisa,&nbsp;Sakina,&nbsp;Nur Ezza Fazleen Mohd Fathil","doi":"10.1515/jbcpp-2023-0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) has been shown to have a favorable effect on many diseases as a complementary therapy and is a critical component of healthy living. During the pandemic era, physical activity has been promoted for resistance against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, there is scarce evidence on whether MVPA could reduce the infectivity and susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the effect of MVPA on morbidity, mortality, and duration of hospitalization in COVID-19 patients. We performed a comprehensive search of five online databases for eligible studies up to September 9, 2021. Meta-analyses were conducted to determine the association between MVPA and COVID-19-related morbidity, hospitalization, and mortality. The odds ratio (OR) was applied as the summary statistic for the primary outcomes. Secondary analyses were conducted to evaluate the difference in the metabolic equivalent of tasks (METs) between the outcome and non-outcome groups with the mean difference as the pooled effect. This meta-analysis included eight observational studies. We found that MVPA significantly reduced the odds of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR=0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.85-0.92), hospitalization (OR=0.56; 95% CI=0.35-0.92), and mortality (OR=0.42; 95% CI=0.21-0.81) due to COVID-19 compared to no physical activity. METs≥500 min/week were linked to decreased morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 (OR=0.94 [95% CI=0.90-0.98]; OR=0.56 [95% CI=0.38-0.83]). COVID-19 patients with MVPA demonstrated a lower risk of COVID-19-related morbidity, hospitalization, and mortality compared to those who were less active, highlighting the importance of an active lifestyle despite the pandemic situation where such activities are limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":15352,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2023-0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) has been shown to have a favorable effect on many diseases as a complementary therapy and is a critical component of healthy living. During the pandemic era, physical activity has been promoted for resistance against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, there is scarce evidence on whether MVPA could reduce the infectivity and susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the effect of MVPA on morbidity, mortality, and duration of hospitalization in COVID-19 patients. We performed a comprehensive search of five online databases for eligible studies up to September 9, 2021. Meta-analyses were conducted to determine the association between MVPA and COVID-19-related morbidity, hospitalization, and mortality. The odds ratio (OR) was applied as the summary statistic for the primary outcomes. Secondary analyses were conducted to evaluate the difference in the metabolic equivalent of tasks (METs) between the outcome and non-outcome groups with the mean difference as the pooled effect. This meta-analysis included eight observational studies. We found that MVPA significantly reduced the odds of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR=0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.85-0.92), hospitalization (OR=0.56; 95% CI=0.35-0.92), and mortality (OR=0.42; 95% CI=0.21-0.81) due to COVID-19 compared to no physical activity. METs≥500 min/week were linked to decreased morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 (OR=0.94 [95% CI=0.90-0.98]; OR=0.56 [95% CI=0.38-0.83]). COVID-19 patients with MVPA demonstrated a lower risk of COVID-19-related morbidity, hospitalization, and mortality compared to those who were less active, highlighting the importance of an active lifestyle despite the pandemic situation where such activities are limited.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间中等至高强度身体活动的重要性:系统综述和荟萃分析
中度到剧烈的身体活动(MVPA)已被证明对许多疾病有良好的影响,作为一种补充疗法,是健康生活的重要组成部分。在大流行时期,促进身体活动以抵抗2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。然而,关于MVPA是否能降低传染性和对SARS-CoV-2的易感性的证据很少。本荟萃分析的目的是确定MVPA对COVID-19患者的发病率、死亡率和住院时间的影响。截至2021年9月9日,我们对5个在线数据库进行了全面搜索,以获得符合条件的研究。进行荟萃分析以确定MVPA与covid -19相关发病率、住院率和死亡率之间的关系。采用优势比(OR)作为主要结局的汇总统计量。进行二次分析以评估结果组和非结果组之间代谢任务当量(METs)的差异,以平均差异作为合并效应。该荟萃分析包括8项观察性研究。我们发现MVPA显著降低了感染SARS-CoV-2的几率(OR=0.88;95%可信区间[CI] = 0.85-0.92),住院率(OR=0.56;95% CI=0.35-0.92),死亡率(OR=0.42;95% CI=0.21-0.81),与不进行体育锻炼相比。METs≥500 min/week与COVID-19发病率和死亡率降低相关(OR=0.94 [95% CI=0.90-0.98];Or =0.56 [95% ci =0.38-0.83])。与活动量较少的患者相比,患有MVPA的COVID-19患者出现与COVID-19相关的发病率、住院率和死亡率的风险较低,这凸显了积极生活方式的重要性,尽管在大流行的情况下,这种活动受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology
Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology (JBCPP) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly published journal in experimental medicine. JBCPP publishes novel research in the physiological and pharmacological sciences, including brain research; cardiovascular-pulmonary interactions; exercise; thermal control; haematology; immune response; inflammation; metabolism; oxidative stress; and phytotherapy. As the borders between physiology, pharmacology and biochemistry become increasingly blurred, we also welcome papers using cutting-edge techniques in cellular and/or molecular biology to link descriptive or behavioral studies with cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the integrative processes. Topics: Behavior and Neuroprotection, Reproduction, Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity, Vascular Conditions, Cardiovascular Function, Cardiovascular-Pulmonary Interactions, Oxidative Stress, Metabolism, Immune Response, Hematological Profile, Inflammation, Infection, Phytotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Effects of an 8-week intervention of anulom vilom pranayama combined with heartfulness meditation on psychological stress, autonomic function, inflammatory biomarkers, and oxidative stress in healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized controlled trial. Effect of high-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous training on cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight and obese individuals. Effects of thyroid hormones in skeletal muscle protein turnover. The pitfalls of linear regression in physiological research. Ureteral access sheaths in RIRS: a retrospective, comparative, single-center study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1