Aboriginal people's perceptions of patient-reported outcome measures in the assessment of diabetes health-related quality of life.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Australian journal of primary health Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1071/PY22150
Alicia Burgess, Jessica Hawkins, Catherine Kostovski, Michelle Kennedy, Stefania Penkala, Kerith Duncanson
{"title":"Aboriginal people's perceptions of patient-reported outcome measures in the assessment of diabetes health-related quality of life.","authors":"Alicia Burgess,&nbsp;Jessica Hawkins,&nbsp;Catherine Kostovski,&nbsp;Michelle Kennedy,&nbsp;Stefania Penkala,&nbsp;Kerith Duncanson","doi":"10.1071/PY22150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide clinicians and consumers a platform to inform and improve healthcare planning and management. Aboriginal people experience disproportionately high rates of chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes. Treatment and management require holistic approaches that draw on culturally relevant resources and assessment tools. This study explored perceptions of Aboriginal people about two diabetes management-related PROMs (PROMIS-29, PAID Scale).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine Aboriginal people living with diabetes in the Shoalhaven discussed two PROMs in one of four focus groups or at an individual interview. Preliminary data coding was conducted by clinician researchers, with thematic analysis overseen by Aboriginal co-researchers. Subsequent individual interviews with participants were undertaken to seek further feedback and articulate what is needed to improve methods of evaluating Aboriginal people's self-reported quality of life and diabetes management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PROMs did not capture information or knowledge that Aboriginal people considered relevant to their diabetes-related health care. Participants' recommendations included adapting survey materials to be more culturally sensitive; for example, by improving the alignment of measures with common day-to-day activities. This study also describes a genuine collaborative, Aboriginal community-guided approach to evaluate 'fit-for-purpose' diabetes management tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Appropriate evaluation methods are paramount to address the disproportionate burden of diabetes experienced by Aboriginal peoples and overcome inverse diabetes care. Our learnings will contribute to development of tools, resources or methods that capture culturally tailored outcome measures. Study findings are relevant to clinicians and researchers using and/or developing Patient Reported Measures, particularly in relation to the practicality of tools for First Nations peoples.</p>","PeriodicalId":8651,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY22150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide clinicians and consumers a platform to inform and improve healthcare planning and management. Aboriginal people experience disproportionately high rates of chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes. Treatment and management require holistic approaches that draw on culturally relevant resources and assessment tools. This study explored perceptions of Aboriginal people about two diabetes management-related PROMs (PROMIS-29, PAID Scale).

Methods: Twenty-nine Aboriginal people living with diabetes in the Shoalhaven discussed two PROMs in one of four focus groups or at an individual interview. Preliminary data coding was conducted by clinician researchers, with thematic analysis overseen by Aboriginal co-researchers. Subsequent individual interviews with participants were undertaken to seek further feedback and articulate what is needed to improve methods of evaluating Aboriginal people's self-reported quality of life and diabetes management.

Results: The PROMs did not capture information or knowledge that Aboriginal people considered relevant to their diabetes-related health care. Participants' recommendations included adapting survey materials to be more culturally sensitive; for example, by improving the alignment of measures with common day-to-day activities. This study also describes a genuine collaborative, Aboriginal community-guided approach to evaluate 'fit-for-purpose' diabetes management tools.

Conclusions: Appropriate evaluation methods are paramount to address the disproportionate burden of diabetes experienced by Aboriginal peoples and overcome inverse diabetes care. Our learnings will contribute to development of tools, resources or methods that capture culturally tailored outcome measures. Study findings are relevant to clinicians and researchers using and/or developing Patient Reported Measures, particularly in relation to the practicality of tools for First Nations peoples.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土著人对糖尿病健康相关生活质量评估中患者报告的结果措施的看法。
背景:患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)为临床医生和消费者提供了一个平台,以告知和改进医疗保健计划和管理。土著人患慢性疾病的比率高得不成比例,其中包括2型糖尿病。治疗和管理需要采用综合方法,利用与文化相关的资源和评估工具。本研究探讨原住民对两项糖尿病管理相关的PROMs (promise -29, PAID Scale)的认知。方法:29名生活在Shoalhaven的土著糖尿病患者在四个焦点小组中的一个或在个人访谈中讨论了两个PROMs。初步数据编码由临床研究人员进行,专题分析由土著共同研究人员监督。随后与参与者进行了个别访谈,以寻求进一步的反馈,并阐明需要改进评估土著人自我报告的生活质量和糖尿病管理的方法。结果:PROMs没有捕捉到原住民认为与糖尿病相关的保健相关的信息或知识。与会者的建议包括调整调查材料,使其更具文化敏感性;例如,通过改进措施与日常活动的一致性。这项研究还描述了一种真正的协作,土著社区指导的方法来评估“适合目的”的糖尿病管理工具。结论:适当的评估方法对于解决原住民所经历的不成比例的糖尿病负担和克服糖尿病逆向护理至关重要。我们的学习将有助于开发工具、资源或方法,以获取符合文化的结果衡量标准。研究结果与临床医生和研究人员使用和/或制定患者报告措施有关,特别是与第一民族工具的实用性有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian journal of primary health
Australian journal of primary health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Primary Health integrates the theory and practise of community health services and primary health care. The journal publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research, reviews, policy reports and analyses from around the world. Articles cover a range of issues influencing community health services and primary health care, particularly comprehensive primary health care research, evidence-based practice (excluding discipline-specific clinical interventions) and primary health care policy issues. Australian Journal of Primary Health is an important international resource for all individuals and organisations involved in the planning, provision or practise of primary health care. Australian Journal of Primary Health is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University.
期刊最新文献
Australian healthcare professionals’ beliefs and practice behaviours in management of chronic pelvic pain: a cross-sectional survey General practice registrars’ practice in outer metropolitan Australia: a cross-sectional comparison with rural and inner metropolitan areas Hepatitis C elimination: amplifying the role of primary care nurses in Australia Abstracts of the Australasian Association for Academic Primary Care (AAAPC) Annual Research Conference Older patients want to talk about sexual health in Australian primary care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1