Depth of reading within the gingival sulcus of seven intraoral scanners: an in vitro study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Computerized Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.3290/j.ijcd.b3963071
Carlo Monaco, Antonio Arena, Andrea Marziali, Ugo Consolo
{"title":"Depth of reading within the gingival sulcus of seven intraoral scanners: an in vitro study.","authors":"Carlo Monaco, Antonio Arena, Andrea Marziali, Ugo Consolo","doi":"10.3290/j.ijcd.b3963071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the depth of reading of intraoral scanners (IOSs) within the gingival sulcus.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A knife-edge preparation for a full crown was performed on a Frasaco model. The gingival sulcus of the scanned model was modified using a dedicated software program (Model Creator, exocad DentalCAD 2.4 Plovdiv) by setting the apical width (AW), coronal width (CW), and gingival sulcus depth (D). Two dental models with different gingival sulcus depths (1 or 2 mm) were printed using the digital light processing (DLP) technique. Each model was scanned 10 times. Seven different IOSs were used: Emerald, Trios 3, Carestream 3600, Dental Wings DWIO, CondorScan, True Definition Scanner (TDS), and Cerec Omnicam. Measurements of D values were performed using 3Shape 3D viewer software. The normality of the data distribution was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test (P < 0.05). The nonparametric Levene's test was used to check for homoscedasticity. The data were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 0.05) and the Nemenyi test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All IOSs were able to read within the 1-mm-deep gingival sulcus, albeit with some statistically significant differences (P < 0.001). TDS and Trios 3 were able to read within the 2-mm-deep gingival sulcus (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The depth of reading of different IOSs can vary significantly. In the model with a 2-mm gingival sulcus, even in the absence of oral fluids, the depth of reading was incomplete, suggesting that deep preparations into the gingival sulcus are difficult to detect with IOSs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48666,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"27-35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b3963071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the depth of reading of intraoral scanners (IOSs) within the gingival sulcus.

Materials and methods: A knife-edge preparation for a full crown was performed on a Frasaco model. The gingival sulcus of the scanned model was modified using a dedicated software program (Model Creator, exocad DentalCAD 2.4 Plovdiv) by setting the apical width (AW), coronal width (CW), and gingival sulcus depth (D). Two dental models with different gingival sulcus depths (1 or 2 mm) were printed using the digital light processing (DLP) technique. Each model was scanned 10 times. Seven different IOSs were used: Emerald, Trios 3, Carestream 3600, Dental Wings DWIO, CondorScan, True Definition Scanner (TDS), and Cerec Omnicam. Measurements of D values were performed using 3Shape 3D viewer software. The normality of the data distribution was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test (P < 0.05). The nonparametric Levene's test was used to check for homoscedasticity. The data were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 0.05) and the Nemenyi test.

Results: All IOSs were able to read within the 1-mm-deep gingival sulcus, albeit with some statistically significant differences (P < 0.001). TDS and Trios 3 were able to read within the 2-mm-deep gingival sulcus (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The depth of reading of different IOSs can vary significantly. In the model with a 2-mm gingival sulcus, even in the absence of oral fluids, the depth of reading was incomplete, suggesting that deep preparations into the gingival sulcus are difficult to detect with IOSs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
七种口内扫描仪在龈沟内的读取深度:体外研究。
目的:本体外研究旨在评估口内扫描仪(IOS)在龈沟内的读取深度:在 Frasaco 模型上进行全冠刀缘预备。通过设置根尖宽度(AW)、冠状宽度(CW)和龈沟深度(D),使用专用软件程序(Model Creator, exocad DentalCAD 2.4 Plovdiv)修改扫描模型的龈沟。使用数字光处理(DLP)技术打印了两个不同龈沟深度(1 或 2 毫米)的牙科模型。每个模型扫描 10 次。使用了七种不同的 IOS:Emerald、Trios 3、Carestream 3600、Dental Wings DWIO、CondorScan、True Definition Scanner (TDS) 和 Cerec Omnicam。D 值的测量使用 3Shape 3D 查看器软件进行。数据分布的正态性使用 Shapiro-Wilk 检验进行评估(P < 0.05)。非参数李文检验用于检查同方差性。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验(α = 0.05)和 Nemenyi 检验对数据进行统计分析:结果:所有 IOS 都能在 1 毫米深的龈沟内读取数据,尽管存在一些统计学上的显著差异(P < 0.001)。TDS 和 Trios 3 能够在 2 毫米深的龈沟内读取数据(P < 0.001):结论:不同 IOS 的读取深度会有很大差异。在龈沟为 2 毫米的模型中,即使没有口腔液,读取深度也不完整,这表明 IOS 很难检测到龈沟内的深层制备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: This journal explores the myriad innovations in the emerging field of computerized dentistry and how to integrate them into clinical practice. The bulk of the journal is devoted to the science of computer-assisted dentistry, with research articles and clinical reports on all aspects of computer-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications, with special emphasis placed on CAD/CAM and image-processing systems. Articles also address the use of computer-based communication to support patient care, assess the quality of care, and enhance clinical decision making. The journal is presented in a bilingual format, with each issue offering three types of articles: science-based, application-based, and national society reports.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of complete-arch, All-on-4 implant scans under simulated intraoral variables. Accuracy of intraoral scanners in neonates cleft anatomy. Effect of the abutment shape on soft tissue healing. A randomized clinical pilot study involving a digital superposition methodology. Intraoral scanning accuracy and trueness for different dental restorations. OccluSense: Reliability, influencing factors and limitations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1