Handedness in twins reared apart: A review of the literature and new data

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuropsychologia Pub Date : 2023-06-06 DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108523
Gareth Richards , Nancy L. Segal
{"title":"Handedness in twins reared apart: A review of the literature and new data","authors":"Gareth Richards ,&nbsp;Nancy L. Segal","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reared-apart twin studies are a powerful means for identifying the relative contributions of heredity and environment to variation in human physical and behavioural traits. One such characteristic is handedness, for which it has long been noted that approximately 20% of twin pairs are comprised of one right-handed cotwin and one left-handed cotwin. Reared-together twin studies suggest a slightly greater concordance in monozygotic (MZT) than dizygotic (DZT) twins, implying that genetics influences hand preference. We report here two studies of handedness in reared-apart twins. Study 1 synthesizes the available data and estimates that at least <em>N</em> = 560 same-sex reared-apart twin pairs (for which zygosity is known with reasonable confidence) have been identified. Of these, handedness data are available for both members of <em>n</em> = 415 pairs. We observed similar levels of concordance/discordance for reared-apart monozygotic (MZA) and dizygotic (DZA) twins. However, although <em>direction</em> of handedness (right or left) has frequently been examined, <em>strength</em> of handedness (strong or weak) has not. Study 2 examined strength of hand preference and relative hand skill, as well as right- and left-hand speed, information available for participants in the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart (MISTRA). We provide evidence of heritability for right-hand and left-hand speed. We also found hand preference strength was more alike than chance in DZA, but not MZA, twins. Findings are discussed in relation to genetic and environmental influences on human handedness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19279,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychologia","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 108523"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002839322300057X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reared-apart twin studies are a powerful means for identifying the relative contributions of heredity and environment to variation in human physical and behavioural traits. One such characteristic is handedness, for which it has long been noted that approximately 20% of twin pairs are comprised of one right-handed cotwin and one left-handed cotwin. Reared-together twin studies suggest a slightly greater concordance in monozygotic (MZT) than dizygotic (DZT) twins, implying that genetics influences hand preference. We report here two studies of handedness in reared-apart twins. Study 1 synthesizes the available data and estimates that at least N = 560 same-sex reared-apart twin pairs (for which zygosity is known with reasonable confidence) have been identified. Of these, handedness data are available for both members of n = 415 pairs. We observed similar levels of concordance/discordance for reared-apart monozygotic (MZA) and dizygotic (DZA) twins. However, although direction of handedness (right or left) has frequently been examined, strength of handedness (strong or weak) has not. Study 2 examined strength of hand preference and relative hand skill, as well as right- and left-hand speed, information available for participants in the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart (MISTRA). We provide evidence of heritability for right-hand and left-hand speed. We also found hand preference strength was more alike than chance in DZA, but not MZA, twins. Findings are discussed in relation to genetic and environmental influences on human handedness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双胞胎分开抚养时的手扶:文献综述和新数据
双胞胎研究是确定遗传和环境对人类身体和行为特征变化的相对贡献的有力手段。一个这样的特征是利手性,长期以来人们一直注意到,大约20%的双胞胎由一对右手和一对左手组成。双胞胎研究表明,单卵双胞胎(MZT)的一致性略高于双卵双胞胎(DZT),这意味着遗传因素会影响手的偏好。我们在这里报道了两项关于分开抚养的双胞胎利手性的研究。研究1综合了现有数据,估计至少有N=560对同性分开饲养的双胞胎(其结合性是合理可信的)已经被确定。其中,利手数据可用于n=415对的两个成员。我们观察到分开饲养的单卵(MZA)和双卵(DZA)双胞胎的一致性/不一致性水平相似。然而,尽管惯用手的方向(右或左)经常被检查,但惯用手的强度(强或弱)却没有。研究2调查了明尼苏达州双胞胎分离研究(MISTRA)参与者的手偏好强度、相对手技能以及左右速度。我们提供了右手和左手速度的遗传力的证据。我们还发现,在DZA中,手偏好强度比机会更相似,但在MZA双胞胎中则不然。研究结果与基因和环境对人类利手习惯的影响有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychologia is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to experimental and theoretical contributions that advance understanding of human cognition and behavior from a neuroscience perspective. The journal will consider for publication studies that link brain function with cognitive processes, including attention and awareness, action and motor control, executive functions and cognitive control, memory, language, and emotion and social cognition.
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal Correlates of Emotional Conflict Processing in Typically Developing Adolescents using Magnetoencephalography. Primary manipulation knowledge of objects is associated with the functional coupling of pMTG and aIPS Temporal dynamics of implicit moral evaluation: From empathy for pain to mentalizing processes Neuroimaging and perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: A narrative review of research and future directions Working memory load increases movement-related alpha and beta desynchronization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1