Analysis of clinical outcomes of arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access in a Mexican elderly population.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Cirugia Y Cirujanos Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24875/CIRU.22000217
Emmanuel Contreras-Jimenez, Gabriel Lopez-Pena, Christopher Ruben-Castillo, Santiago Mier Y Teran-Ellis, Cesar Cuen-Ojeda, Luis H Arzola-Flores, Javier E Anaya-Ayala, Carlos A Hinojosa
{"title":"Analysis of clinical outcomes of arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access in a Mexican elderly population.","authors":"Emmanuel Contreras-Jimenez,&nbsp;Gabriel Lopez-Pena,&nbsp;Christopher Ruben-Castillo,&nbsp;Santiago Mier Y Teran-Ellis,&nbsp;Cesar Cuen-Ojeda,&nbsp;Luis H Arzola-Flores,&nbsp;Javier E Anaya-Ayala,&nbsp;Carlos A Hinojosa","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.22000217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The increased survival rates of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients have impacted directly in the proportion of elderly patients requiring a reliable hemodialysis (HD) access; this group clearly demands an individualized approach. We aim to analyze maturation and patency rates of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was retrospective review of a database of patients that underwent AVF creation in our institution. The maturation and patency rates were analyzed divided in groups based on age (equal and greater of 65 years, and patients under 65 years). Patency rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients ≥ 65 years old (mean 73, SD ± 5.4) were analyzed. The overall maturation rate in this group was 75% compared to 84.1% (p = 0.33) in the younger group (mean age 48 years, SD ± 17). The primary patency at 6 and 12 months for the ≥ 65 years group was 93% and 86%, respectively, compared with 85% and 81% for the younger group (p = 0.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Autogenous AVF remains the preferred and durable option for elderly patients. We found no difference in terms of maturation and patency rates compared to younger patients. Standardized protocols are needed to optimally select vascular accesses.</p>","PeriodicalId":50990,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Y Cirujanos","volume":"91 2","pages":"200-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Y Cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.22000217","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The increased survival rates of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients have impacted directly in the proportion of elderly patients requiring a reliable hemodialysis (HD) access; this group clearly demands an individualized approach. We aim to analyze maturation and patency rates of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) in elderly patients.

Methods: This was retrospective review of a database of patients that underwent AVF creation in our institution. The maturation and patency rates were analyzed divided in groups based on age (equal and greater of 65 years, and patients under 65 years). Patency rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: Twenty patients ≥ 65 years old (mean 73, SD ± 5.4) were analyzed. The overall maturation rate in this group was 75% compared to 84.1% (p = 0.33) in the younger group (mean age 48 years, SD ± 17). The primary patency at 6 and 12 months for the ≥ 65 years group was 93% and 86%, respectively, compared with 85% and 81% for the younger group (p = 0.77).

Conclusion: Autogenous AVF remains the preferred and durable option for elderly patients. We found no difference in terms of maturation and patency rates compared to younger patients. Standardized protocols are needed to optimally select vascular accesses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥老年人群血液透析通道动静脉瘘的临床结果分析。
目的:终末期肾病(ESRD)患者生存率的提高直接影响到需要可靠血液透析(HD)途径的老年患者比例;这个群体显然需要个性化的方法。目的分析老年动静脉瘘(AVF)的成熟率和通畅率。方法:本研究是对我院接受AVF创建的患者数据库进行回顾性分析。成熟率和通畅率按年龄分组(65岁及以上,65岁以下)进行分析。采用Kaplan-Meier分析比较通畅率。结果:20例患者≥65岁(平均73岁,SD±5.4)。该组的总成熟率为75%,而年轻组(平均年龄48岁,SD±17)为84.1% (p = 0.33)。≥65岁组6个月和12个月的原发性通畅率分别为93%和86%,而年轻组为85%和81% (p = 0.77)。结论:自体房颤仍是老年患者的首选和持久的选择。我们发现,与年轻患者相比,在成熟和通畅率方面没有差异。需要标准化的方案来最佳地选择血管通路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cirugia Y Cirujanos
Cirugia Y Cirujanos 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cirugía y Cirujanoses exponente del desarrollo académico, científico, médico, quirúrgico y tecnológico en materia de salud en México y en el ámbito internacional. Es una revista bimestral, open access, revisada por pares, que publica en español y en inglés (traducido sin coste para los autores) artículos científicos originales, casos clínicos, artículos de revisión de interés general y cartas al editor. Los artículos se seleccionan y publican siguiendo un riguroso análisis, de acuerdo con los estándares internacionalmente aceptados. Sus espacios están abiertos a los académicos, así como a todo miembro de la comunidad médica que manifieste interés por utilizar este foro para publicar sus trabajos.
期刊最新文献
Clinical outcomes and radiological assessment of vascular anatomy in patients who underwent D3 left hemicolectomy. A model to determine factors influencing intraoperative complications in sleeve gastrectomy. [Extremity soft tissue sarcoma: does surgical margin impact survival?] Relación preoperatoria de neutrófilos a proteína C reactiva como predictor de complicaciones posoperatorias del cáncer de pancreas ¿La vía de señalización de sonic hedgehog desempeña un papel en el mecanismo antirreflujo de la vejiga en los niños?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1