Clinical decision support systems to improve drug prescription and therapy optimisation in clinical practice: a scoping review.

IF 4.1 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Health & Care Informatics Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100683
Lucrezia Greta Armando, Gianluca Miglio, Pierluigi de Cosmo, Clara Cena
{"title":"Clinical decision support systems to improve drug prescription and therapy optimisation in clinical practice: a scoping review.","authors":"Lucrezia Greta Armando,&nbsp;Gianluca Miglio,&nbsp;Pierluigi de Cosmo,&nbsp;Clara Cena","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can reduce medical errors increasing drug prescription appropriateness. Deepening knowledge of existing CDSSs could increase their use by healthcare professionals in different settings (ie, hospitals, pharmacies, health research centres) of clinical practice. This review aims to identify the characteristics common to effective studies conducted with CDSSs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The article sources were Scopus, PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE and Web of Science, queried between January 2017 and January 2022. Inclusion criteria were prospective and retrospective studies that reported original research on CDSSs for clinical practice support; studies should describe a measurable comparison of the intervention or observation conducted with and without the CDSS; article language Italian or English. Reviews and studies with CDSSs used exclusively by patients were excluded. A Microsoft Excel spreadsheet was prepared to extract and summarise data from the included articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search resulted in the identification of 2424 articles. After title and abstract screening, 136 studies remained, 42 of which were included for final evaluation. Most of the studies included rule-based CDSSs that are integrated into existing databases with the main purpose of managing disease-related problems. The majority of the selected studies (25 studies; 59.5%) were successful in supporting clinical practice, with most being pre-post intervention studies and involving the presence of a pharmacist.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>A number of characteristics have been identified that may help the design of studies feasible to demonstrate the effectiveness of CDSSs. Further studies are needed to encourage CDSS use.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/60/bmjhci-2022-100683.PMC10163516.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can reduce medical errors increasing drug prescription appropriateness. Deepening knowledge of existing CDSSs could increase their use by healthcare professionals in different settings (ie, hospitals, pharmacies, health research centres) of clinical practice. This review aims to identify the characteristics common to effective studies conducted with CDSSs.

Materials and methods: The article sources were Scopus, PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE and Web of Science, queried between January 2017 and January 2022. Inclusion criteria were prospective and retrospective studies that reported original research on CDSSs for clinical practice support; studies should describe a measurable comparison of the intervention or observation conducted with and without the CDSS; article language Italian or English. Reviews and studies with CDSSs used exclusively by patients were excluded. A Microsoft Excel spreadsheet was prepared to extract and summarise data from the included articles.

Results: The search resulted in the identification of 2424 articles. After title and abstract screening, 136 studies remained, 42 of which were included for final evaluation. Most of the studies included rule-based CDSSs that are integrated into existing databases with the main purpose of managing disease-related problems. The majority of the selected studies (25 studies; 59.5%) were successful in supporting clinical practice, with most being pre-post intervention studies and involving the presence of a pharmacist.

Discussion and conclusion: A number of characteristics have been identified that may help the design of studies feasible to demonstrate the effectiveness of CDSSs. Further studies are needed to encourage CDSS use.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床决策支持系统,以改善药物处方和治疗优化在临床实践:范围审查。
目的:临床决策支持系统(cdss)可以减少医疗差错,提高药物处方的适宜性。加深对现有cdss的了解,可以增加医疗保健专业人员在不同环境(即医院、药房、卫生研究中心)的临床实践中使用这些cdss。本综述旨在确定cdss有效研究的共同特征。材料和方法:文章来源为Scopus、PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE和Web of Science,查询时间为2017年1月至2022年1月。纳入标准为前瞻性和回顾性研究,这些研究报告了cdss的原始研究,以支持临床实践;研究应描述使用和不使用CDSS进行的干预或观察的可衡量的比较;文章语言意大利语或英语。排除了仅由患者使用cdss的综述和研究。准备了一个微软Excel电子表格,从纳入的文章中提取和汇总数据。结果:检索结果鉴定出2424篇。在标题和摘要筛选之后,136项研究被保留下来,其中42项被纳入最终评估。大多数研究包括基于规则的cdss,这些cdss被整合到现有数据库中,主要目的是管理与疾病相关的问题。大多数选定的研究(25项研究;59.5%)成功地支持了临床实践,其中大多数是干预前和干预后的研究,并且有药剂师在场。讨论和结论:已经确定了一些特征,这些特征可能有助于设计可行的研究,以证明cdss的有效性。需要进一步的研究来鼓励CDSS的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Scaling equitable artificial intelligence in healthcare with machine learning operations. Understanding prescribing errors for system optimisation: the technology-related error mechanism classification. Detection of hypertension from pharyngeal images using deep learning algorithm in primary care settings in Japan. PubMed captures more fine-grained bibliographic data on scientific commentary than Web of Science: a comparative analysis. Method to apply temporal graph analysis on electronic patient record data to explore healthcare professional-patient interaction intensity: a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1