Bone Regeneration in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin (A-PRF) and Plasma Rich in Growth Factors (PRGF): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.11607/prd.5491
Panagiotis Dragonas, Hari S Prasad, Qingzhao Yu, Elizabeth T Mayer, Paul L Fidel
{"title":"Bone Regeneration in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin (A-PRF) and Plasma Rich in Growth Factors (PRGF): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Panagiotis Dragonas,&nbsp;Hari S Prasad,&nbsp;Qingzhao Yu,&nbsp;Elizabeth T Mayer,&nbsp;Paul L Fidel","doi":"10.11607/prd.5491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this pilot randomized controlled trial was to analyze and compare the effects of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) and plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) combined with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) on bone regeneration outcomes in maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) procedures. A total of 15 patients in need of MSA were consecutively recruited. Maxillary sinuses were grafted with DBBM alone (control group), DBBM mixed with A-PRF (PRF group), or DBBM mixed with PRGF (PRGF group). After a 6-month healing period, bone core biopsy samples were collected prior to implant placement for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. The mean percentage of mineralized tissue (MT) was 20.33 ± 11.50 in the control group, 32.20 ± 7.29 for the PRF group, and 34.80 ± 6.83 for the PRGF group, with no statistically significant differences across the three groups (P > .05). The mean percentage of remaining bone grafting material (RBGM) was 24.00 ± 7.94 for the control group, 26.00 ± 7.78 for the PRF group, and 15.80 ± 8.23 for the PRGF group, with no statistically significant differences across the three groups (P > .05). Finally, the mean percentage of nonmineralized tissue (NMT) was 55.66 ± 7.77 for the control group, 41.40 ± 8.32 for the PRF group, and 49.60 ± 5.68 for the PRGF group, with no statistically signifcant differences across the three groups (P > .05). These findings suggest that the addition of A-PRF and PRGF to DBBM does not enhance new bone formation outcomes in maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. Neither of the two platelet concentrates were superior to the other in any of the variables assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54948,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.5491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot randomized controlled trial was to analyze and compare the effects of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) and plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) combined with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) on bone regeneration outcomes in maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) procedures. A total of 15 patients in need of MSA were consecutively recruited. Maxillary sinuses were grafted with DBBM alone (control group), DBBM mixed with A-PRF (PRF group), or DBBM mixed with PRGF (PRGF group). After a 6-month healing period, bone core biopsy samples were collected prior to implant placement for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. The mean percentage of mineralized tissue (MT) was 20.33 ± 11.50 in the control group, 32.20 ± 7.29 for the PRF group, and 34.80 ± 6.83 for the PRGF group, with no statistically significant differences across the three groups (P > .05). The mean percentage of remaining bone grafting material (RBGM) was 24.00 ± 7.94 for the control group, 26.00 ± 7.78 for the PRF group, and 15.80 ± 8.23 for the PRGF group, with no statistically significant differences across the three groups (P > .05). Finally, the mean percentage of nonmineralized tissue (NMT) was 55.66 ± 7.77 for the control group, 41.40 ± 8.32 for the PRF group, and 49.60 ± 5.68 for the PRGF group, with no statistically signifcant differences across the three groups (P > .05). These findings suggest that the addition of A-PRF and PRGF to DBBM does not enhance new bone formation outcomes in maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. Neither of the two platelet concentrates were superior to the other in any of the variables assessed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高级富血小板纤维蛋白(A- prf)和富生长因子血浆(PRGF)在上颌窦增强术中的骨再生:一项随机对照试验
本随机对照试验的目的是分析和比较晚期富血小板纤维蛋白(A-PRF)和富生长因子血浆(PRGF)联合去蛋白牛骨矿物质(DBBM)对上颌窦增强术(MSA)骨再生结果的影响。连续招募15例需要MSA的患者。分别采用DBBM单独(对照组)、DBBM与A-PRF混合(PRF组)、DBBM与PRGF混合(PRGF组)进行上颌窦移植。在6个月的愈合期后,在植入植体之前收集骨芯活检样本进行组织学和组织形态学分析。对照组矿化组织(MT)平均百分比为20.33±11.50,PRF组为32.20±7.29,PRGF组为34.80±6.83,三组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。对照组(24.00±7.94)、PRF组(26.00±7.78)、PRGF组(15.80±8.23)的平均残余植骨材料百分率(RBGM),三组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。对照组、PRF组和PRGF组非矿化组织(NMT)的平均百分比分别为55.66±7.77、41.40±8.32和49.60±5.68,三组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。这些发现表明,在DBBM中添加A-PRF和PRGF并不能提高上颌窦增强术中新骨形成的结果。在评估的任何变量中,两种血小板浓缩物都不优于另一种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry will publish manuscripts concerned with all aspects of clinical periodontology, restorative dentistry, and implantology. This includes pertinent research as well as clinical methodology (their interdependence and relationship should be addressed where applicable); proceedings of relevant symposia or conferences; and quality review papers. Original manuscripts are considered for publication on the condition that they have not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
The Trapezoidal Sling Suture: A Technical Note of a Novel Suturing Technique for Tunneling Flap Procedures. Treatment of Mandibular Class III/IV Furcation Defects with a Combination Plastic Regenerative Technique: A Case Series. The Use of Enamel Matrix Derivative to Modulate Wound Healing of Peri-implant Soft Tissues. Root Coverage and Volumetric Outcomes of a Novel Porcine-Derived Acellular Dermal Matrix with the Tunneled Coronally Advanced Flap (TCAF) for Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recessions: A Clinical Prospective Study. The Guided Bone Regeneration of a Large, Noncontained Maxillary Anterior Perforation Defect: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1