Answering calls for rigorous health equity research: a cross-sectional study leveraging electronic health records for data disaggregation in Latinos.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Family Medicine and Community Health Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1136/fmch-2022-001972
John Heintzman, Dang Dinh, Jennifer A Lucas, Elena Byhoff, Danielle M Crookes, Ayana April-Sanders, Jorge Kaufmann, Dave Boston, Audree Hsu, Sophia Giebultowicz, Miguel Marino
{"title":"Answering calls for rigorous health equity research: a cross-sectional study leveraging electronic health records for data disaggregation in Latinos.","authors":"John Heintzman, Dang Dinh, Jennifer A Lucas, Elena Byhoff, Danielle M Crookes, Ayana April-Sanders, Jorge Kaufmann, Dave Boston, Audree Hsu, Sophia Giebultowicz, Miguel Marino","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2022-001972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Country of birth/nativity information may be crucial to understanding health equity in Latino populations and is routinely called for in health services literature assessing cardiovascular disease and risk, but is not thought to co-occur with longitudinal, objective health information such as that found in electronic health records (EHRs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a multistate network of community health centres to describe the extent to which country of birth is recorded in EHRs in Latinos, and to describe demographic features and cardiovascular risk profiles by country of birth. We compared geographical/demographic/clinical characteristics, from 2012 to 2020 (9 years of data), of 914 495 Latinos recorded as US-born, non-US-born and without a country of birth recorded. We also described the state in which these data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Country of birth was collected for 127 138 Latinos in 782 clinics in 22 states. Compared with those with a country of birth recorded, Latinos without this record were more often uninsured and less often preferred Spanish. While covariate adjusted prevalence of heart disease and risk factors were similar between the three groups, when results were disaggregated to five specific Latin countries (Mexico, Guatemala, Dominican Republic, Cuba, El Salvador), significant variation was observed, especially in diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a multistate network, thousands of non-US-born, US-born and patients without a country of birth recorded had differing demographic characteristics, but clinical variation was not observed until data was disaggregated into specific country of origin. State policies that enhance the safety of immigrant populations may enhance the collection of health equity related data. Rigorous and effective health equity research using Latino country of birth information paired with longitudinal healthcare information found in EHRs might have significant potential for aiding clinical and public health practice, but it depends on increased, widespread and accurate availability of this information, co-occurring with other robust demographic and clinical data nativity.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/59/08/fmch-2022-001972.PMC10186452.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2022-001972","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Country of birth/nativity information may be crucial to understanding health equity in Latino populations and is routinely called for in health services literature assessing cardiovascular disease and risk, but is not thought to co-occur with longitudinal, objective health information such as that found in electronic health records (EHRs).

Methods: We used a multistate network of community health centres to describe the extent to which country of birth is recorded in EHRs in Latinos, and to describe demographic features and cardiovascular risk profiles by country of birth. We compared geographical/demographic/clinical characteristics, from 2012 to 2020 (9 years of data), of 914 495 Latinos recorded as US-born, non-US-born and without a country of birth recorded. We also described the state in which these data were collected.

Results: Country of birth was collected for 127 138 Latinos in 782 clinics in 22 states. Compared with those with a country of birth recorded, Latinos without this record were more often uninsured and less often preferred Spanish. While covariate adjusted prevalence of heart disease and risk factors were similar between the three groups, when results were disaggregated to five specific Latin countries (Mexico, Guatemala, Dominican Republic, Cuba, El Salvador), significant variation was observed, especially in diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia.

Conclusions: In a multistate network, thousands of non-US-born, US-born and patients without a country of birth recorded had differing demographic characteristics, but clinical variation was not observed until data was disaggregated into specific country of origin. State policies that enhance the safety of immigrant populations may enhance the collection of health equity related data. Rigorous and effective health equity research using Latino country of birth information paired with longitudinal healthcare information found in EHRs might have significant potential for aiding clinical and public health practice, but it depends on increased, widespread and accurate availability of this information, co-occurring with other robust demographic and clinical data nativity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
响应严格的健康公平研究号召:利用电子健康记录对拉丁裔进行数据分类的横断面研究。
导言:出生国/种族信息可能对了解拉丁裔人口的健康公平性至关重要,在评估心血管疾病和风险的医疗服务文献中也经常需要这些信息,但人们认为这些信息并不与电子健康记录(EHR)中的纵向客观健康信息同时存在:我们利用社区卫生中心的多州网络来描述电子健康记录中记录的拉丁裔出生国的范围,并按出生国描述人口特征和心血管风险概况。我们比较了从 2012 年到 2020 年(9 年数据)914 495 名被记录为在美国出生、非美国出生和未记录出生国的拉美人的地理/人口/临床特征。我们还描述了收集这些数据的州:我们收集了 22 个州 782 家诊所中 127 138 名拉美人的出生国家。与有出生国记录的拉美人相比,没有出生国记录的拉美人更经常没有保险,也更少选择西班牙语。虽然经协变因素调整后,三组人的心脏病患病率和风险因素相似,但将结果细分到五个特定的拉丁国家(墨西哥、危地马拉、多米尼加共和国、古巴、萨尔瓦多)时,观察到了显著的差异,尤其是在糖尿病、高血压和高脂血症方面:在一个多州网络中,数以千计的非美国出生、美国出生和未记录出生国的患者具有不同的人口特征,但在按具体原籍国分列数据后,才观察到临床差异。加强移民安全的国家政策可能会促进健康公平相关数据的收集。利用拉丁裔出生地信息与电子病历中的纵向医疗保健信息配对进行严格有效的健康公平研究,可能对临床和公共卫生实践有很大的潜在帮助,但这取决于该信息的增加、普及和准确可用性,以及其他强大的人口和临床数据本源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
期刊最新文献
fRAP 2.0: a community engagement method applied to cervical cancer disparities among Hispanic women. Survey of international experts on research priorities to improve care for healthy ageing. Global lessons on delivery of primary healthcare services for people with non-communicable diseases: convergent mixed methods. Individual and geospatial factors associated with receipt of colorectal cancer screening: a state-wide mixed-level analysis. Effectiveness of post-COVID-19 primary care attendance in improving survival in very old patients with multimorbidity: a territory-wide target trial emulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1