Nursing Staff Perceptions of Outcomes Related to Honoring Residents' "Risky" Preferences.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Research in Gerontological Nursing Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-10 DOI:10.3928/19404921-20220930-01
Liza L Behrens, Marie Boltz, Mark Sciegaj, Ann Kolanowski, Joanne Roman Jones, Anju Paudel, Kimberly Van Haitsma
{"title":"Nursing Staff Perceptions of Outcomes Related to Honoring Residents' \"Risky\" Preferences.","authors":"Liza L Behrens,&nbsp;Marie Boltz,&nbsp;Mark Sciegaj,&nbsp;Ann Kolanowski,&nbsp;Joanne Roman Jones,&nbsp;Anju Paudel,&nbsp;Kimberly Van Haitsma","doi":"10.3928/19404921-20220930-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nursing homes (NHs) are challenged to consistently deliver person-centered care (PCC), or care based on residents' values and preferences. NH staff associate certain resident preferences with risk. However, there are limited evidence-based person-centered risk management strategies to assist NH staff with risky resident preferences. The purpose of the current study was to explore NH staff perceptions of health and safety outcomes associated with honoring NH residents' risky preferences to inform intervention development. This descriptive, qualitative study used sequential focus groups and content analysis, revealing that nursing staff perceive negative and positive outcomes for staff and residents when seeking to honor residents' risky preferences. This finding is supported by three themes: <i>Potential Harms to Staff</i>, <i>Potential Harms to Residents</i>, and <i>Positive Shared Outcomes</i>. These results contribute a set of nurse-driven quality of life and quality of care outcomes for NH staff and residents associated with PCC delivery in NHs. [<i>Research in Gerontological Nursing, 15</i>(6), 271-281.].</p>","PeriodicalId":51272,"journal":{"name":"Research in Gerontological Nursing","volume":"15 6","pages":"271-281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10189806/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Gerontological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20220930-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Nursing homes (NHs) are challenged to consistently deliver person-centered care (PCC), or care based on residents' values and preferences. NH staff associate certain resident preferences with risk. However, there are limited evidence-based person-centered risk management strategies to assist NH staff with risky resident preferences. The purpose of the current study was to explore NH staff perceptions of health and safety outcomes associated with honoring NH residents' risky preferences to inform intervention development. This descriptive, qualitative study used sequential focus groups and content analysis, revealing that nursing staff perceive negative and positive outcomes for staff and residents when seeking to honor residents' risky preferences. This finding is supported by three themes: Potential Harms to Staff, Potential Harms to Residents, and Positive Shared Outcomes. These results contribute a set of nurse-driven quality of life and quality of care outcomes for NH staff and residents associated with PCC delivery in NHs. [Research in Gerontological Nursing, 15(6), 271-281.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理人员对结果的认知与尊重居民的“风险”偏好有关。
养老院(NHs)面临着持续提供以人为中心的护理(PCC)或基于居民价值观和偏好的护理的挑战。NH工作人员将某些居民偏好与风险联系起来。然而,以证据为基础的以人为中心的风险管理策略有限,无法帮助NH工作人员应对有风险的居民偏好。本研究的目的是探讨NH工作人员对与尊重NH居民的风险偏好相关的健康和安全结果的看法,以告知干预发展。这项描述性、定性研究使用了顺序焦点小组和内容分析,揭示了护理人员在寻求尊重居民的风险偏好时,对工作人员和居民的负面和正面结果的看法。这一发现得到了三个主题的支持:对员工的潜在伤害、对居民的潜在伤害和积极的共享结果。这些结果为NH工作人员和居民提供了一套由护士驱动的生活质量和护理质量结果,这些结果与NH中PCC的提供有关。[老年护理研究,15(6),271-281。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Gerontological Nursing is a forum for disseminating peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, cutting-edge gerontological nursing research and theory to investigators, educators, academicians, clinicians, and policymakers involved with older adults in all health care settings. The Journal accepts manuscripts reporting research, theory, integrative and systematic reviews, instrument development, and research methods with the aims of improving the wellness and quality of care of the older adult population. Theory papers should advance gerontological knowledge, and integrative reviews should provide an analysis of the state of the science and provide direction for future research.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Risk Factors for Falls in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis. Erratum for "Factors Contributing to Well-Being in Japanese Community-Dwelling Older Adults Who Experienced Spousal Bereavement". Feasibility of a Culture-Based Multicomponent Cognitive Training Program for Older Adults With Dementia. Hospital at Home: An Example of Research Needed to Shape Policy. Mechanisms Underlying the Use of Abusive and Neglectful Behaviors in Dementia Caregiving: The Role of Caregiver Mental Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1