Access to meaning from visual input: Object and word frequency effects in categorization behavior.

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-08 DOI:10.1037/xge0001342
Klara Gregorová, Jacopo Turini, Benjamin Gagl, Melissa Le-Hoa Võ
{"title":"Access to meaning from visual input: Object and word frequency effects in categorization behavior.","authors":"Klara Gregorová,&nbsp;Jacopo Turini,&nbsp;Benjamin Gagl,&nbsp;Melissa Le-Hoa Võ","doi":"10.1037/xge0001342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Object and word recognition are both cognitive processes that transform visual input into meaning. When reading words, the frequency of their occurrence (\"word frequency,\" WF) strongly modulates access to their meaning, as seen in recognition performance. Does the frequency of objects in our world also affect access to their meaning? With object labels available in real-world image datasets, one can now estimate the frequency of occurrence of objects in scenes (\"object frequency,\" OF). We explored frequency effects in word and object recognition behavior by employing a natural versus man-made categorization task (Experiment 1) and a matching-mismatching priming task (Experiments 2-3). In Experiment 1, we found a WF effect for both words and objects but no OF effect. In Experiment 2, we replicated the WF effect for both stimulus types during cross-modal priming but not uni-modal priming. Moreover, in cross-modal priming, we found an OF effect for both objects and words, but with faster responses when objects occur less frequently in image datasets. We replicated this counterintuitive OF effect in Experiment 3 and suggest that better recognition of rare objects might interact with the structure of object categories: while access to the meaning of objects and words is faster when their meaning often occurs in our language, the homogeneity of object categories seems to also impact recognition, mainly when semantic processing happens in the context of previously presented information. These findings have major implications for studies attempting to include frequency measures in investigations of access to meaning from visual inputs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":" ","pages":"2861-2881"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001342","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Object and word recognition are both cognitive processes that transform visual input into meaning. When reading words, the frequency of their occurrence ("word frequency," WF) strongly modulates access to their meaning, as seen in recognition performance. Does the frequency of objects in our world also affect access to their meaning? With object labels available in real-world image datasets, one can now estimate the frequency of occurrence of objects in scenes ("object frequency," OF). We explored frequency effects in word and object recognition behavior by employing a natural versus man-made categorization task (Experiment 1) and a matching-mismatching priming task (Experiments 2-3). In Experiment 1, we found a WF effect for both words and objects but no OF effect. In Experiment 2, we replicated the WF effect for both stimulus types during cross-modal priming but not uni-modal priming. Moreover, in cross-modal priming, we found an OF effect for both objects and words, but with faster responses when objects occur less frequently in image datasets. We replicated this counterintuitive OF effect in Experiment 3 and suggest that better recognition of rare objects might interact with the structure of object categories: while access to the meaning of objects and words is faster when their meaning often occurs in our language, the homogeneity of object categories seems to also impact recognition, mainly when semantic processing happens in the context of previously presented information. These findings have major implications for studies attempting to include frequency measures in investigations of access to meaning from visual inputs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从视觉输入中获取意义:分类行为中的对象和词频效应。
物体识别和单词识别都是将视觉输入转化为意义的认知过程。当阅读单词时,它们的出现频率(“单词频率”,WF)强烈地调节对其含义的理解,如识别性能所示。物体在我们世界中的频率是否也会影响对其意义的理解?有了真实世界图像数据集中可用的对象标签,现在可以估计场景中对象的出现频率(“对象频率”,of)。我们通过使用自然与人为分类任务(实验1)和匹配失配启动任务(实验2-3)来探索单词和对象识别行为中的频率效应。在实验1中,我们发现单词和对象都有WF效应,但没有OF效应。在实验2中,我们在跨模态启动过程中复制了两种刺激类型的WF效应,而不是单模态启动。此外,在跨模态启动中,我们发现对象和单词都有OF效应,但当对象在图像数据集中出现频率较低时,反应更快。我们在实验3中复制了这种违反直觉的OF效应,并认为更好地识别稀有物体可能会与物体类别的结构相互作用:虽然当物体和单词的含义经常出现在我们的语言中时,对它们的含义的理解会更快,但物体类别的同质性似乎也会影响识别,主要是当语义处理发生在先前呈现的信息的上下文中时。这些发现对试图将频率测量纳入视觉输入意义获取调查的研究具有重要意义。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: General publishes articles describing empirical work that bridges the traditional interests of two or more communities of psychology. The work may touch on issues dealt with in JEP: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, JEP: Human Perception and Performance, JEP: Animal Behavior Processes, or JEP: Applied, but may also concern issues in other subdisciplines of psychology, including social processes, developmental processes, psychopathology, neuroscience, or computational modeling. Articles in JEP: General may be longer than the usual journal publication if necessary, but shorter articles that bridge subdisciplines will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Bypassing versus correcting misinformation: Efficacy and fundamental processes. Risky hybrid foraging: The impact of risk, reward value, and prevalence on foraging behavior in hybrid visual search. Shortcuts to insincerity: Texting abbreviations seem insincere and not worth answering. Confidence regulates feedback processing during human probabilistic learning. Does affective processing require awareness? On the use of the Perceptual Awareness Scale in response priming research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1