Moderators of exercise effects on self-reported cognitive functioning in cancer survivors: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Cancer Survivorship Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-09 DOI:10.1007/s11764-023-01392-3
Anouk E Hiensch, Julia Beckhaus, Lenja Witlox, Evelyn M Monninkhof, Sanne B Schagen, Jonna K van Vulpen, Maike G Sweegers, Robert U Newton, Neil K Aaronson, Daniel A Galvão, Karen Steindorf, Martijn M Stuiver, Ilse Mesters, Hans Knoop, Martine M Goedendorp, Martin Bohus, Lene Thorsen, Karl-Heinz Schulz, Martina E Schmidt, Cornelia M Ulrich, Gabe S Sonke, Wim H van Harten, Kerri M Winters-Stone, Miranda J Velthuis, Dennis R Taaffe, Willem van Mechelen, Marie José Kersten, Frans Nollet, Joachim Wiskemann, Laurien M Buffart, Anne M May
{"title":"Moderators of exercise effects on self-reported cognitive functioning in cancer survivors: an individual participant data meta-analysis.","authors":"Anouk E Hiensch, Julia Beckhaus, Lenja Witlox, Evelyn M Monninkhof, Sanne B Schagen, Jonna K van Vulpen, Maike G Sweegers, Robert U Newton, Neil K Aaronson, Daniel A Galvão, Karen Steindorf, Martijn M Stuiver, Ilse Mesters, Hans Knoop, Martine M Goedendorp, Martin Bohus, Lene Thorsen, Karl-Heinz Schulz, Martina E Schmidt, Cornelia M Ulrich, Gabe S Sonke, Wim H van Harten, Kerri M Winters-Stone, Miranda J Velthuis, Dennis R Taaffe, Willem van Mechelen, Marie José Kersten, Frans Nollet, Joachim Wiskemann, Laurien M Buffart, Anne M May","doi":"10.1007/s11764-023-01392-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) assesses exercise effects on self-reported cognitive functioning (CF) and investigates whether effects differ by patient-, intervention-, and exercise-related characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IPD from 16 exercise RCTs, including 1987 patients across multiple types of non-metastatic cancer, was pooled. A one-stage IPD-MA using linear mixed-effect models was performed to assess exercise effects on self-reported CF (z-score) and to identify whether the effect was moderated by sociodemographic, clinical, intervention- and exercise-related characteristics, or fatigue, depression, anxiety, and self-reported CF levels at start of the intervention (i.e., baseline). Models were adjusted for baseline CF and included a random intercept at study level to account for clustering of patients within studies. A sensitivity analysis was performed in patients who reported cognitive problems at baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Minimal significant beneficial exercise effects on self-reported CF (β=-0.09 [-0.16; -0.02]) were observed, with slightly larger effects when the intervention was delivered post-treatment (n=745, β=-0.13 [-0.24; -0.02]), and no significant effect during cancer treatment (n=1,162, β=-0.08 [-0.18; 0.02]). Larger effects were observed in interventions of 12 weeks or shorter (β=-0.14 [-0.25; -0.04]) or 24 weeks or longer (β=-0.18 [-0.32; -0.02]), whereas no effects were observed in interventions of 12-24 weeks (β=0.01 [-0.13; 0.15]). Exercise interventions were most beneficial when provided to patients without anxiety symptoms (β=-0.10 [-0.19; -0.02]) or after completion of treatment in patients with cognitive problems (β=-0.19 [-0.31; -0.06]). No other significant moderators were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This cross-cancer IPD meta-analysis observed small beneficial exercise effects on self-reported CF when the intervention was delivered post-treatment, especially in patients who reported cognitive problems at baseline.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>This study provides some evidence to support the prescription of exercise to improve cognitive functioning. Sufficiently powered trials are warranted to make more definitive recommendations and include these in the exercise guidelines for cancer survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01392-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) assesses exercise effects on self-reported cognitive functioning (CF) and investigates whether effects differ by patient-, intervention-, and exercise-related characteristics.

Methods: IPD from 16 exercise RCTs, including 1987 patients across multiple types of non-metastatic cancer, was pooled. A one-stage IPD-MA using linear mixed-effect models was performed to assess exercise effects on self-reported CF (z-score) and to identify whether the effect was moderated by sociodemographic, clinical, intervention- and exercise-related characteristics, or fatigue, depression, anxiety, and self-reported CF levels at start of the intervention (i.e., baseline). Models were adjusted for baseline CF and included a random intercept at study level to account for clustering of patients within studies. A sensitivity analysis was performed in patients who reported cognitive problems at baseline.

Results: Minimal significant beneficial exercise effects on self-reported CF (β=-0.09 [-0.16; -0.02]) were observed, with slightly larger effects when the intervention was delivered post-treatment (n=745, β=-0.13 [-0.24; -0.02]), and no significant effect during cancer treatment (n=1,162, β=-0.08 [-0.18; 0.02]). Larger effects were observed in interventions of 12 weeks or shorter (β=-0.14 [-0.25; -0.04]) or 24 weeks or longer (β=-0.18 [-0.32; -0.02]), whereas no effects were observed in interventions of 12-24 weeks (β=0.01 [-0.13; 0.15]). Exercise interventions were most beneficial when provided to patients without anxiety symptoms (β=-0.10 [-0.19; -0.02]) or after completion of treatment in patients with cognitive problems (β=-0.19 [-0.31; -0.06]). No other significant moderators were identified.

Conclusions: This cross-cancer IPD meta-analysis observed small beneficial exercise effects on self-reported CF when the intervention was delivered post-treatment, especially in patients who reported cognitive problems at baseline.

Implications for cancer survivors: This study provides some evidence to support the prescription of exercise to improve cognitive functioning. Sufficiently powered trials are warranted to make more definitive recommendations and include these in the exercise guidelines for cancer survivors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动对癌症幸存者自我报告认知功能影响的调节因素:个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
目的:这项个体参与者数据荟萃分析(IPD-MA)评估了运动对自我报告的认知功能(CF)的影响,并研究了患者、干预和运动相关特征是否会产生不同的影响:方法:汇总了 16 项运动 RCT 的 IPD,其中包括 1987 名多种类型的非转移性癌症患者。采用线性混合效应模型进行了单阶段 IPD-MA,以评估运动对自我报告的 CF(z-分数)的影响,并确定该影响是否受社会人口学、临床、干预和运动相关特征,或干预开始时(即基线)的疲劳、抑郁、焦虑和自我报告的 CF 水平的调节。模型对基线 CF 进行了调整,并在研究水平上加入了随机截距,以考虑研究中患者的聚类情况。对基线时报告有认知问题的患者进行了敏感性分析:结果:观察到运动对自我报告的CF(β=-0.09 [-0.16; -0.02])有微小的有益影响,在治疗后进行干预的影响稍大(n=745,β=-0.13 [-0.24; -0.02]),而在癌症治疗期间没有明显影响(n=1,162,β=-0.08 [-0.18; 0.02])。在 12 周或更短时间(β=-0.14 [-0.25; -0.04])或 24 周或更长时间(β=-0.18 [-0.32; -0.02])的干预中观察到较大的效果,而在 12-24 周的干预中未观察到效果(β=0.01 [-0.13; 0.15])。运动干预对无焦虑症状的患者最有益(β=-0.10 [-0.19; -0.02]),对有认知问题的患者则在治疗结束后最有益(β=-0.19 [-0.31; -0.06])。没有发现其他重要的调节因素:这项跨癌症IPD荟萃分析观察到,在治疗后进行干预时,运动对自我报告的CF有微小的有益影响,尤其是对基线时报告有认知问题的患者:这项研究提供了一些证据,支持通过运动来改善认知功能。要做出更明确的建议,并将这些建议纳入癌症幸存者运动指南,还需要进行充分有效的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
10.80%
发文量
149
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with anxiety in colorectal cancer survivors: a scoping review. Priorities for multimorbidity management and research in cancer: a Delphi study of Australian cancer survivors, clinicians, and researchers. Breast cancer survivors' exercise preferences change during an exercise intervention are associated with post-intervention physical activity. Theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review. Positive and negative survivor-specific psychosocial consequences of childhood cancer: the DCCSS-LATER 2 psycho-oncology study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1