Social cognition and apathy between two cognitive subtypes of schizophrenia: Are there the same or different profiles?

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Schizophrenia Research-Cognition Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.scog.2023.100287
Shih-Kuang Chiang , Shih-Min Lai , Tsung-Ming Hu
{"title":"Social cognition and apathy between two cognitive subtypes of schizophrenia: Are there the same or different profiles?","authors":"Shih-Kuang Chiang ,&nbsp;Shih-Min Lai ,&nbsp;Tsung-Ming Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2023.100287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Cognitive impairment is an essential feature of schizophrenia, and it involves a broad array of nonsocial and social cognitive domains. This study aimed to examine whether there are the same or different social cognition profiles between two cognitive subtypes of schizophrenia.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>There were one hundred and two chronic and institutionalized patients with schizophrenia from two referral tracks. One group is “Cognitively Normal Range” (CNR) (N = 52), and another group is “Below Normal Range” (BNR) (N = 50). We assessed or collected their apathy, emotional perception judgment, facial expression judgment, and empathy by the Apathy Evaluation Scale, the International Affective Picture System, the Japanese and Caucasian Facial Expression of Emotion, and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found different impairment profiles depending on the cognitive subtypes of the patient with schizophrenia. Surprisingly, the CNR presented impairments in apathy, emotional perception judgment, facial expression judgment, and empathy and feature impairment in empathy and affective apathy. In contrast, even though the BNR had significant neurocognition impairments, they had almost intact empathy with significantly impaired cognitive apathy. Both groups' global deficit scores (GDSs) were comparable, and all reached at least a mild impairment level.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The CNR and the BNR had similar abilities in emotional perception judgment and facial emotion recognition. They also had differentiable deficits in apathy and empathy. Our findings provide important clinical implications for neuropsychological pathology and treatment in schizophrenia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4c/c0/main.PMC10196718.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001323000100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Cognitive impairment is an essential feature of schizophrenia, and it involves a broad array of nonsocial and social cognitive domains. This study aimed to examine whether there are the same or different social cognition profiles between two cognitive subtypes of schizophrenia.

Method

There were one hundred and two chronic and institutionalized patients with schizophrenia from two referral tracks. One group is “Cognitively Normal Range” (CNR) (N = 52), and another group is “Below Normal Range” (BNR) (N = 50). We assessed or collected their apathy, emotional perception judgment, facial expression judgment, and empathy by the Apathy Evaluation Scale, the International Affective Picture System, the Japanese and Caucasian Facial Expression of Emotion, and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, respectively.

Results

We found different impairment profiles depending on the cognitive subtypes of the patient with schizophrenia. Surprisingly, the CNR presented impairments in apathy, emotional perception judgment, facial expression judgment, and empathy and feature impairment in empathy and affective apathy. In contrast, even though the BNR had significant neurocognition impairments, they had almost intact empathy with significantly impaired cognitive apathy. Both groups' global deficit scores (GDSs) were comparable, and all reached at least a mild impairment level.

Conclusions

The CNR and the BNR had similar abilities in emotional perception judgment and facial emotion recognition. They also had differentiable deficits in apathy and empathy. Our findings provide important clinical implications for neuropsychological pathology and treatment in schizophrenia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神分裂症两种认知亚型之间的社会认知和冷漠:有相同或不同的特征吗?
认知障碍是精神分裂症的一个基本特征,它涉及广泛的非社会和社会认知领域。本研究旨在检验精神分裂症的两种认知亚型之间是否存在相同或不同的社会认知特征。方法对102例精神分裂症慢性住院患者进行两次转诊。其中一组为“认知正常范围”(CNR)(N=52),另一组为《低于正常范围》(BNR)(N=50)。我们分别通过冷漠评估量表、国际情感图片系统、日本人和高加索人的面部情绪表达以及人际反应指数来评估或收集他们的冷漠、情绪感知判断、面部表情判断和同理心。结果根据精神分裂症患者的认知亚型,我们发现了不同的损伤特征。令人惊讶的是,CNR在冷漠、情绪感知判断、面部表情判断和移情方面存在障碍,并在移情和情感冷漠方面存在特征性障碍。相比之下,尽管BNR有严重的神经认知障碍,但他们的同理心几乎完好无损,认知冷漠严重受损。两组的全球赤字评分(GDS)具有可比性,且均达到轻度损伤水平。结论CNR和BNR在情绪感知判断和面部情绪识别方面具有相似的能力。他们在冷漠和同理心方面也有明显的缺陷。我们的研究结果为精神分裂症的神经心理病理学和治疗提供了重要的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
期刊最新文献
Cognitive functioning and functional ability in women with schizophrenia and homelessness Humor processing and its relationship with clinical features in patients with first-episode schizophrenia Through the lens of schizophrenia: Recognizing negative facial expressions and family patterns Transcranial direct current stimulation and its effect on cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia: An updated review Advances in the ecological validity of research on social cognition in schizophrenia: A systematic review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1