Influence of carbon-based cathodes on biofilm composition and electrochemical performance in soil microbial fuel cells

IF 14 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science and Ecotechnology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ese.2023.100276
Arpita Nandy , Daniel Farkas , Belén Pepió-Tárrega , Sandra Martinez-Crespiera , Eduard Borràs , Claudio Avignone-Rossa , Mirella Di Lorenzo
{"title":"Influence of carbon-based cathodes on biofilm composition and electrochemical performance in soil microbial fuel cells","authors":"Arpita Nandy ,&nbsp;Daniel Farkas ,&nbsp;Belén Pepió-Tárrega ,&nbsp;Sandra Martinez-Crespiera ,&nbsp;Eduard Borràs ,&nbsp;Claudio Avignone-Rossa ,&nbsp;Mirella Di Lorenzo","doi":"10.1016/j.ese.2023.100276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Increasing energy demands and environmental pollution concerns press for sustainable and environmentally friendly technologies. Soil microbial fuel cell (SMFC) technology has great potential for carbon-neutral bioenergy generation and self-powered electrochemical bioremediation. In this study, an in-depth assessment on the effect of several carbon-based cathode materials on the electrochemical performance of SMFCs is provided for the first time. An innovative carbon nanofibers electrode doped with Fe (CNFFe) is used as cathode material in membrane-less SMFCs, and the performance of the resulting device is compared with SMFCs implementing either Pt-doped carbon cloth (PtC), carbon cloth, or graphite felt (GF) as the cathode. Electrochemical analyses are integrated with microbial analyses to assess the impact on both electrogenesis and microbial composition of the anodic and cathodic biofilm. The results show that CNFFe and PtC generate very stable performances, with a peak power density (with respect to the cathode geometric area) of 25.5 and 30.4 mW m<sup>−2</sup>, respectively. The best electrochemical performance was obtained with GF, with a peak power density of 87.3 mW m<sup>−2</sup>. Taxonomic profiling of the microbial communities revealed differences between anodic and cathodic communities. The anodes were predominantly enriched with <em>Geobacter</em> and <em>Pseudomonas</em> species, while cathodic communities were dominated by hydrogen-producing and hydrogenotrophic bacteria, indicating H<sub>2</sub> cycling as a possible electron transfer mechanism. The presence of nitrate-reducing bacteria, combined with the results of cyclic voltammograms, suggests microbial nitrate reduction occurred on GF cathodes. The results of this study can contribute to the development of effective SMFC design strategies for field implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34434,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100276"},"PeriodicalIF":14.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9a/df/main.PMC10189395.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498423000418","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Increasing energy demands and environmental pollution concerns press for sustainable and environmentally friendly technologies. Soil microbial fuel cell (SMFC) technology has great potential for carbon-neutral bioenergy generation and self-powered electrochemical bioremediation. In this study, an in-depth assessment on the effect of several carbon-based cathode materials on the electrochemical performance of SMFCs is provided for the first time. An innovative carbon nanofibers electrode doped with Fe (CNFFe) is used as cathode material in membrane-less SMFCs, and the performance of the resulting device is compared with SMFCs implementing either Pt-doped carbon cloth (PtC), carbon cloth, or graphite felt (GF) as the cathode. Electrochemical analyses are integrated with microbial analyses to assess the impact on both electrogenesis and microbial composition of the anodic and cathodic biofilm. The results show that CNFFe and PtC generate very stable performances, with a peak power density (with respect to the cathode geometric area) of 25.5 and 30.4 mW m−2, respectively. The best electrochemical performance was obtained with GF, with a peak power density of 87.3 mW m−2. Taxonomic profiling of the microbial communities revealed differences between anodic and cathodic communities. The anodes were predominantly enriched with Geobacter and Pseudomonas species, while cathodic communities were dominated by hydrogen-producing and hydrogenotrophic bacteria, indicating H2 cycling as a possible electron transfer mechanism. The presence of nitrate-reducing bacteria, combined with the results of cyclic voltammograms, suggests microbial nitrate reduction occurred on GF cathodes. The results of this study can contribute to the development of effective SMFC design strategies for field implementation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碳基阴极对土壤微生物燃料电池生物膜组成及电化学性能的影响
日益增长的能源需求和环境污染问题迫切需要可持续和环境友好型技术。土壤微生物燃料电池(SMFC)技术在碳中性生物能源发电和自供电电化学生物修复方面具有巨大的潜力。在本研究中,首次深入评估了几种碳基正极材料对smfc电化学性能的影响。在无膜smfc中,采用了一种新型掺杂Fe (CNFFe)的碳纳米纤维电极作为正极材料,并将其性能与采用掺杂pt碳布(PtC)、碳布或石墨毡(GF)作为正极的smfc进行了比较。电化学分析与微生物分析相结合,以评估对阳极和阴极生物膜的电生成和微生物组成的影响。结果表明,CNFFe和PtC产生了非常稳定的性能,峰值功率密度(相对于阴极几何面积)分别为25.5和30.4 mW m−2。GF的电化学性能最好,峰值功率密度为87.3 mW m−2。微生物群落的分类分析显示阳极和阴极群落之间存在差异。阳极以地杆菌和假单胞菌为主,而阴极以产氢菌和养氢菌为主,表明H2循环可能是电子传递机制。硝酸盐还原细菌的存在,结合循环伏安图的结果,表明微生物硝酸盐还原发生在GF阴极上。本研究的结果有助于制定有效的SMFC设计策略,以供现场实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
6.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Ecotechnology (ESE) is an international, open-access journal publishing original research in environmental science, engineering, ecotechnology, and related fields. Authors publishing in ESE can immediately, permanently, and freely share their work. They have license options and retain copyright. Published by Elsevier, ESE is co-organized by the Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, and the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Accelerating the establishment of a new science-policy panel to address the triple planetary crisis Rapid identification of antibiotic resistance gene hosts by prescreening ARG-like reads Enhanced removal of chiral emerging contaminants by an electroactive biofilter Mitigating household air pollution exposure through kitchen renovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1