The brief measure of preoperative emotional stress screens preoperative maladaptive psychological features and predicts postoperative opioid use: an observational study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bjane.2023.02.004
Rogério Boff Borges , Wolnei Caumo , Caroline Bavaresco , Luciana Paula Cadore Stefani , Vinicius Souza dos Santos , Stela Maris de Jezus Castro
{"title":"The brief measure of preoperative emotional stress screens preoperative maladaptive psychological features and predicts postoperative opioid use: an observational study","authors":"Rogério Boff Borges ,&nbsp;Wolnei Caumo ,&nbsp;Caroline Bavaresco ,&nbsp;Luciana Paula Cadore Stefani ,&nbsp;Vinicius Souza dos Santos ,&nbsp;Stela Maris de Jezus Castro","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2023.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Brief Measure of Preoperative Emotional Stress (B-MEPS) is a suitable screening tool for Preoperative Emotional Stress (PES). However, personalized decision-making demands practical interpretation of the refined version of B-MEPS. Thus, we propose and validate cut-off points on the B-MEPS to classify PES. Also, we assessed if the cut-off points screened preoperative maladaptive psychological features and predicted postoperative opioid use.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This observational study comprises samples of two other primary studies, with 1009 and 233 individuals, respectively. The latent class analysis derived emotional stress subgroups using B-MEPS items. We compared membership with the B-MEPS score through the Youden index. Concurrent criterion validity of the cut-off points was performed with the severity of preoperative depressive symptoms, pain catastrophizing, central sensitization, and sleep quality. Predictive criterion validity was performed with opioid use after surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We chose a model with three classes labeled mild, moderate, and severe. The Youden index points -0.1663 and 0.7614 of the B-MEPS score classify individuals, in the severe class, with a sensitivity of 85.7% (80.1%–90.3%) and specificity of 93.5% (91.5–95.1%). The cut-off points of the B-MEPS score have satisfactory concurrent and predictive criterion validity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings showed that the preoperative emotional stress index on the B-MEPS offers suitable sensitivity and specificity for discriminating the severity of preoperative psychological stress. They provide a simple tool to identify patients prone to severe PES related to maladaptive psychological features, which might influence the perception of pain and analgesic opioid use in the postoperative period.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001423000192/pdfft?md5=5d7ec076c342ba6251ae81d3508e18af&pid=1-s2.0-S0104001423000192-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001423000192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Brief Measure of Preoperative Emotional Stress (B-MEPS) is a suitable screening tool for Preoperative Emotional Stress (PES). However, personalized decision-making demands practical interpretation of the refined version of B-MEPS. Thus, we propose and validate cut-off points on the B-MEPS to classify PES. Also, we assessed if the cut-off points screened preoperative maladaptive psychological features and predicted postoperative opioid use.

Methods

This observational study comprises samples of two other primary studies, with 1009 and 233 individuals, respectively. The latent class analysis derived emotional stress subgroups using B-MEPS items. We compared membership with the B-MEPS score through the Youden index. Concurrent criterion validity of the cut-off points was performed with the severity of preoperative depressive symptoms, pain catastrophizing, central sensitization, and sleep quality. Predictive criterion validity was performed with opioid use after surgery.

Results

We chose a model with three classes labeled mild, moderate, and severe. The Youden index points -0.1663 and 0.7614 of the B-MEPS score classify individuals, in the severe class, with a sensitivity of 85.7% (80.1%–90.3%) and specificity of 93.5% (91.5–95.1%). The cut-off points of the B-MEPS score have satisfactory concurrent and predictive criterion validity.

Conclusions

These findings showed that the preoperative emotional stress index on the B-MEPS offers suitable sensitivity and specificity for discriminating the severity of preoperative psychological stress. They provide a simple tool to identify patients prone to severe PES related to maladaptive psychological features, which might influence the perception of pain and analgesic opioid use in the postoperative period.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前情绪压力简测筛选术前不良心理特征并预测术后阿片类药物的使用:一项观察性研究
背景术前情绪压力简明测量法(B-MEPS)是一种适用于术前情绪压力(PES)的筛查工具。然而,个性化决策需要对改进版 B-MEPS 进行实际解读。因此,我们提出并验证了 B-MEPS 对 PES 进行分类的临界点。此外,我们还评估了这些临界点是否能筛查术前适应不良心理特征并预测术后阿片类药物的使用情况。方法这项观察性研究由另外两项主要研究的样本组成,分别有 1009 人和 233 人参加。潜类分析利用 B-MEPS 项目得出了情绪压力亚组。我们通过尤登指数(Youden index)比较了成员与 B-MEPS 分数的关系。我们将截断点与术前抑郁症状严重程度、疼痛灾难化、中枢敏感化和睡眠质量进行了并行标准验证。我们选择了轻度、中度和重度三个等级的模型。B-MEPS评分的尤登指数点-0.1663和0.7614将患者划分为重度,灵敏度为85.7%(80.1%-90.3%),特异度为93.5%(91.5%-95.1%)。B-MEPS 评分的临界点具有令人满意的并发和预测标准有效性。它们提供了一种简单的工具,用于识别与适应不良心理特征相关的严重术前情绪应激反应患者,这些心理特征可能会影响患者对疼痛的感知和术后阿片类镇痛药的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
期刊最新文献
Assessment of superior vena cava diameter and collapsibility index in liver transplantation: a prospective observational study The debate on antifibrinolytics in liver transplantation: always, never, or sometimes? Comparison of propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl combinations for sedation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized clinical trial Intraoperative hypotension and postoperative delirium in elderly male patients undergoing laryngectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study The efficacy of buprenorphine compared with dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1