Self-assessment of empathy uncovers defective self-awareness in mild cognitive impairment.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-16 DOI:10.1037/neu0000896
Davide Quaranta, Chiara Cerami, Naike Caraglia, Emanuele Maria Costantini, Sonia Di Tella, Maria Caterina Silveri, Stefano Cappa, Simona Gaudino, Camillo Marra, Alessandra Dodich
{"title":"Self-assessment of empathy uncovers defective self-awareness in mild cognitive impairment.","authors":"Davide Quaranta, Chiara Cerami, Naike Caraglia, Emanuele Maria Costantini, Sonia Di Tella, Maria Caterina Silveri, Stefano Cappa, Simona Gaudino, Camillo Marra, Alessandra Dodich","doi":"10.1037/neu0000896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Self-assessment scales are broadly used to evaluate empathy in neurological patients, but it is conceivable that some discrepancy with caregiver evaluation may emerge as consequence of reduced self-awareness. The aim of the present study was to verify the presence of discrepancies in the self-assessment of empathy in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and to explore their neural correlates.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty MCI patients and 38 healthy controls (HCs) underwent the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), exploring the following four aspects of empathy: perspective taking (PT), fantasy, empathic concern, and personal distress. The questionnaire was administered in two modalities: self-administered, and administered to an informant, and the scores were compared. The correlation between discrepancies and regional cortical thickness was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The self-administered version of IRI showed higher PT scores in MCI as compared to HC (<i>p</i> = .017), with no differences detected in the other subscales. The difference between the scores obtained in the self-administered and in the informant-administered IRI-PT was significantly higher in MCI than in HCs (<i>p</i> = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The self-assessment of empathy in subjects with MCI may be misleading because of a tendency toward an overestimation of the PT ability, typically considered as a cognitive component of empathy. Our results may reflect a particular aspect of reduced self-awareness in MCI subjects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000896","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Self-assessment scales are broadly used to evaluate empathy in neurological patients, but it is conceivable that some discrepancy with caregiver evaluation may emerge as consequence of reduced self-awareness. The aim of the present study was to verify the presence of discrepancies in the self-assessment of empathy in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and to explore their neural correlates.

Method: Twenty MCI patients and 38 healthy controls (HCs) underwent the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), exploring the following four aspects of empathy: perspective taking (PT), fantasy, empathic concern, and personal distress. The questionnaire was administered in two modalities: self-administered, and administered to an informant, and the scores were compared. The correlation between discrepancies and regional cortical thickness was assessed.

Results: The self-administered version of IRI showed higher PT scores in MCI as compared to HC (p = .017), with no differences detected in the other subscales. The difference between the scores obtained in the self-administered and in the informant-administered IRI-PT was significantly higher in MCI than in HCs (p = .006).

Conclusion: The self-assessment of empathy in subjects with MCI may be misleading because of a tendency toward an overestimation of the PT ability, typically considered as a cognitive component of empathy. Our results may reflect a particular aspect of reduced self-awareness in MCI subjects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移情的自我评估揭示了轻度认知障碍中自我意识的缺陷。
目的:自我评估量表被广泛用于评估神经系统患者的同理心,但可以想象,由于自我意识的降低,可能会出现与照顾者评估的一些差异。本研究的目的是验证轻度认知障碍(MCI)受试者在移情自我评估中是否存在差异,并探讨其神经相关性。方法:对20名MCI患者和38名健康对照(HC)进行人际反应指数(IRI)测试,探讨移情的四个方面:视角转换(PT)、幻想、移情关怀和个人痛苦。问卷采用两种方式进行管理:自我管理和由线人管理,并对得分进行比较。评估差异与区域皮质厚度之间的相关性。结果:与HC相比,自我管理版本的IRI在MCI中显示出更高的PT得分(p=.017),在其他分量表中没有发现差异。自我管理和线人管理的IRI-PT在MCI中获得的分数之间的差异显著高于HC(p=0.006)。结论:MCI受试者的移情自我评估可能具有误导性,因为PT能力往往被高估,通常被认为是移情的认知组成部分。我们的研究结果可能反映了MCI受试者自我意识下降的一个特定方面。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychology
Neuropsychology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.
期刊最新文献
Getting oriented: Redefining attention deficits in Parkinson's disease. Association between social networks and cognition among middle-aged and older adults in rural India. Corpus callosum structure and auditory interhemispheric transfer in spina bifida myelomeningocele. Executive function is associated with the development of math performance in children born at <30 weeks' gestation or <1250 g birthweight. Is hyperactivity in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) a functional response to demands on specific executive functions or cognitive demands in general?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1