Quality of life of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients after brachytherapy-based treatment: A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.5114/jcb.2023.127050
Danique A Scheltes, Elzbieta M van der Steen-Banasik, Geert A H J Smits
{"title":"Quality of life of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients after brachytherapy-based treatment: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Danique A Scheltes,&nbsp;Elzbieta M van der Steen-Banasik,&nbsp;Geert A H J Smits","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2023.127050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the quality of life (QoL) of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who underwent bladder-sparing treatment with high-dose-rate brachytherapy, and compare their QoL with an age-matched general Dutch population.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, prospective, descriptive cross-sectional study. MIBC patients who underwent brachytherapy-based bladder sparing treatment in Arnhem, The Netherlands from January 2016 to June 2021, were requested to complete the following questionnaires: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) generic (QLQ-C30), bladder cancer-specific (QLQ-BLM30), and expanded prostate cancer index composite bowel (EPIC-50). Mean scores were calculated and compared with general Dutch population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean global health status/QoL score of the treated patients was 80.6. High scores were noted in the functional scales, including physical (86.8), role (85.6), emotional (88.6), cognitive (88.3), and social functioning (88.9), while the main reported complains were related to fatigue (21.9) and urinary symptoms (25.1). Compared to the general Dutch population, significant differences were visible in global health status/QoL (80.6 vs. 75.7), pain (9.0 vs. 17.8), insomnia (23.3 vs. 15.2), and constipation (13.3 vs. 6.8). However, in no case did the mean score differ by more than ten points, which was considered clinically relevant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With a mean global health status/QoL score of 80.6, the patients after brachytherapy-based bladder sparing treatment have a good QoL. We found no clinically relevant difference in QoL comparing with an age-matched general Dutch population. The outcome strengthens the idea that this treatment option should be discussed with all patients eligible for brachytherapy-based treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"15 2","pages":"110-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c6/3a/JCB-15-50617.PMC10196731.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.127050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the quality of life (QoL) of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who underwent bladder-sparing treatment with high-dose-rate brachytherapy, and compare their QoL with an age-matched general Dutch population.

Material and methods: We conducted a single-center, prospective, descriptive cross-sectional study. MIBC patients who underwent brachytherapy-based bladder sparing treatment in Arnhem, The Netherlands from January 2016 to June 2021, were requested to complete the following questionnaires: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) generic (QLQ-C30), bladder cancer-specific (QLQ-BLM30), and expanded prostate cancer index composite bowel (EPIC-50). Mean scores were calculated and compared with general Dutch population.

Results: The mean global health status/QoL score of the treated patients was 80.6. High scores were noted in the functional scales, including physical (86.8), role (85.6), emotional (88.6), cognitive (88.3), and social functioning (88.9), while the main reported complains were related to fatigue (21.9) and urinary symptoms (25.1). Compared to the general Dutch population, significant differences were visible in global health status/QoL (80.6 vs. 75.7), pain (9.0 vs. 17.8), insomnia (23.3 vs. 15.2), and constipation (13.3 vs. 6.8). However, in no case did the mean score differ by more than ten points, which was considered clinically relevant.

Conclusions: With a mean global health status/QoL score of 80.6, the patients after brachytherapy-based bladder sparing treatment have a good QoL. We found no clinically relevant difference in QoL comparing with an age-matched general Dutch population. The outcome strengthens the idea that this treatment option should be discussed with all patients eligible for brachytherapy-based treatment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌侵性膀胱癌患者近距离放疗后的生活质量:一项横断面研究
目的:确定肌肉侵袭性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者接受保膀胱高剂量近距离放射治疗的生活质量(QoL),并将其与年龄匹配的荷兰普通人群的生活质量进行比较。材料和方法:我们进行了一项单中心、前瞻性、描述性横断面研究。2016年1月至2021年6月在荷兰阿纳姆接受近距离膀胱保留治疗的MIBC患者被要求完成以下问卷:欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织(EORTC)通用(QLQ-C30)、膀胱癌特异性(QLQ-BLM30)和扩大前列腺癌指数复合肠(EPIC-50)。计算平均得分,并与一般荷兰人进行比较。结果:治疗组患者总体健康状况/生活质量平均评分为80.6分。在身体(86.8)、角色(85.6)、情感(88.6)、认知(88.3)和社会功能(88.9)等功能量表中得分较高,而报告的主要抱怨与疲劳(21.9)和泌尿系统症状(25.1)有关。与荷兰普通人群相比,总体健康状况/生活质量(80.6 vs. 75.7)、疼痛(9.0 vs. 17.8)、失眠(23.3 vs. 15.2)和便秘(13.3 vs. 6.8)方面存在显著差异。然而,在任何情况下,平均得分的差异都不超过10分,这被认为是临床相关的。结论:近距离膀胱保留治疗后患者总体健康状况/生活质量平均评分为80.6,生活质量较好。我们发现与年龄匹配的荷兰普通人群相比,生活质量没有临床相关的差异。结果加强了这种治疗方案应该与所有有资格接受近距离治疗的患者讨论的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The “Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy” is an international and multidisciplinary journal that will publish papers of original research as well as reviews of articles. Main subjects of the journal include: clinical brachytherapy, combined modality treatment, advances in radiobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as physical aspects relevant to brachytherapy, particularly in the field of imaging, dosimetry and radiation therapy planning. Original contributions will include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization and normal tissue protection, molecular radiation biology, and clinical investigations of cancer treatment in brachytherapy. Another field of interest will be the educational part of the journal.
期刊最新文献
The role of EUS-guided iodine-125 seed implantation in patients with unresectable ampullary cancer after relief of obstructive jaundice Acute toxicity outcomes from salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after prior radiotherapy Differential outcomes of re-stratified high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiation therapy plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost A unified strategy to focal brachytherapy incorporating transperineal biopsy, image fusion, and real-time implantation with and without rectal spacer simulated in prostate phantoms Post-operative complications following dose adaptation of intra-operative electron beam radiation therapy in locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1