Use of preinjury antiplatelet and oral anticoagulant agents on outcomes following blunt trauma in an Asian population: a 1:2 propensity score matched study.

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Kai Siang Chan, Karen Tsung Shyen Go, Li Tserng Teo, Serene Si Ning Goh
{"title":"Use of preinjury antiplatelet and oral anticoagulant agents on outcomes following blunt trauma in an Asian population: a 1:2 propensity score matched study.","authors":"Kai Siang Chan,&nbsp;Karen Tsung Shyen Go,&nbsp;Li Tserng Teo,&nbsp;Serene Si Ning Goh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bleeding is a feared complication of antiplatelets (APTs) and oral anti-coagulants (OACs) use. Asians are at higher risk of bleeding from APT/OAC compared to Western population. Our study aims to investigate the impact of preinjury APT/OAC use on outcomes of moderate to severe blunt trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study from Jan 2017 - Dec 2019 of all patients with moderate to severe blunt trauma. A 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to address for confounding factors. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Our secondary outcomes were severity of head injury and need for emergency surgery within the first 24 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 592 patients (APT/OAC n=72, no APT/OAC n=520) included in our study. The median age was 74 years in APT/OAC and 58 years in no APT/OAC. PSM resulted in 150 patients (APT/OAC n=50, no APT/OAC n=100). In the PSM cohort, more patients with APT/OAC use had ischemic heart disease (76% vs 0%, P<0.001). APT/OAC use was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality (22.0% vs 9.0%, Odds ratio (OR) 3.00, 95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.05, 8.56, P=0.040) Severity of head injury (abbreviated injury scale in APT/OAC: 3.33 ± 1.53, vs 2.97 ± 1.43, P=0.380) and need for emergency surgery (APT/OAC 16.2% vs 11.0%, P=0.434) was comparable between APT/OAC and no APT/OAC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preinjury APT/OAC use was associated with higher in-hospital mortality. Severity of head injury and need for emergency surgery within 24 hours from admission were comparable between APT/OAC use and no APT/OAC use.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":"13 2","pages":"65-77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195218/pdf/ijbt0013-0065.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bleeding is a feared complication of antiplatelets (APTs) and oral anti-coagulants (OACs) use. Asians are at higher risk of bleeding from APT/OAC compared to Western population. Our study aims to investigate the impact of preinjury APT/OAC use on outcomes of moderate to severe blunt trauma.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study from Jan 2017 - Dec 2019 of all patients with moderate to severe blunt trauma. A 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to address for confounding factors. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Our secondary outcomes were severity of head injury and need for emergency surgery within the first 24 hours.

Results: There were 592 patients (APT/OAC n=72, no APT/OAC n=520) included in our study. The median age was 74 years in APT/OAC and 58 years in no APT/OAC. PSM resulted in 150 patients (APT/OAC n=50, no APT/OAC n=100). In the PSM cohort, more patients with APT/OAC use had ischemic heart disease (76% vs 0%, P<0.001). APT/OAC use was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality (22.0% vs 9.0%, Odds ratio (OR) 3.00, 95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.05, 8.56, P=0.040) Severity of head injury (abbreviated injury scale in APT/OAC: 3.33 ± 1.53, vs 2.97 ± 1.43, P=0.380) and need for emergency surgery (APT/OAC 16.2% vs 11.0%, P=0.434) was comparable between APT/OAC and no APT/OAC.

Conclusions: Preinjury APT/OAC use was associated with higher in-hospital mortality. Severity of head injury and need for emergency surgery within 24 hours from admission were comparable between APT/OAC use and no APT/OAC use.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在亚洲人群中,损伤前抗血小板和口服抗凝剂对钝性创伤后预后的影响:1:2倾向评分匹配研究
背景:出血是使用抗血小板(APTs)和口服抗凝剂(OACs)时令人担忧的并发症。与西方人群相比,亚洲人患APT/OAC出血的风险更高。我们的研究旨在探讨损伤前使用APT/OAC对中重度钝性创伤预后的影响。方法:这是一项2017年1月至2019年12月的回顾性队列研究,纳入了所有中重度钝性创伤患者。进行1:2倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析以解决混杂因素。我们的主要结局是住院死亡率。我们的次要结局是头部损伤的严重程度和需要在头24小时内进行紧急手术。结果:本研究共纳入592例患者(APT/OAC 72例,未纳入APT/OAC 520例)。APT/OAC组中位年龄为74岁,无APT/OAC组中位年龄为58岁。PSM患者150例(APT/OAC n=50,未APT/OAC n=100)。在PSM队列中,更多使用APT/OAC的患者患有缺血性心脏病(76% vs 0%)。结论:损伤前使用APT/OAC与较高的住院死亡率相关。在使用APT/OAC和未使用APT/OAC之间,头部损伤的严重程度和入院后24小时内急诊手术的需要是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Autologous non-vascularized fibula with compression plating in the management of aseptic complex non-union of long bones. Combined awake videolaryngo-bronchoscopy intubation with HFNC preoxygenation for predicted difficult airway in a patient with post-burn mentosternal scar contracture. Comparative outcome of ultrasound guided vs. fluoroscopy guided hydrodilatation in adhesive capsulitis: a prospective study. Evaluation of pain associated with the application of burn dressings. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour presenting as pathological fracture of proximal femur in neurofibromatosis type-1: a case report with brief literature search.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1