Psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder in the fifth edition of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: An attempted replication of Wygant et al. (2016).

Personality disorders Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-25 DOI:10.1037/per0000626
Gillian A McCabe, Michelle M Smith, Thomas A Widiger
{"title":"Psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder in the fifth edition of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: An attempted replication of Wygant et al. (2016).","authors":"Gillian A McCabe,&nbsp;Michelle M Smith,&nbsp;Thomas A Widiger","doi":"10.1037/per0000626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The fifth edition of the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)</i> Section III Alternative Model of Personality Disorder (AMPD) was developed to ameliorate some of the concerns of the <i>DSM-5</i> Section II categorical model by moving away from the discrete boundaries of behaviorally specific criteria to a hybridized dimensional trait-based approach. Wygant et al. (2016) examined the extent to which the AMPD improved the operationalization of antisocial personality disorder to more closely align with psychopathy, a notable weakness of DSM-5 Section II (Crego & Widiger, 2015; Lynam & Vachon, 2012; Strickland et al., 2013). Wygant et al. found that the DSM-5 Section III AMPD outperformed Section II in predicting various operationalizations of psychopathy in a sample of 200 male inmates. In the spirit of the importance in exploring replication (Tackett et al., 2017), the current study sought to replicate and extend these findings by comparing the ability of the AMPD and alternative trait models to account for psychopathy. Analyses showed a partial replication of Wygant et al.'s findings, indicating that additional traits to account for psychopathy should be included in <i>DSM-5</i> Section III. The current study was not preregistered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fifth edition of the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) Section III Alternative Model of Personality Disorder (AMPD) was developed to ameliorate some of the concerns of the DSM-5 Section II categorical model by moving away from the discrete boundaries of behaviorally specific criteria to a hybridized dimensional trait-based approach. Wygant et al. (2016) examined the extent to which the AMPD improved the operationalization of antisocial personality disorder to more closely align with psychopathy, a notable weakness of DSM-5 Section II (Crego & Widiger, 2015; Lynam & Vachon, 2012; Strickland et al., 2013). Wygant et al. found that the DSM-5 Section III AMPD outperformed Section II in predicting various operationalizations of psychopathy in a sample of 200 male inmates. In the spirit of the importance in exploring replication (Tackett et al., 2017), the current study sought to replicate and extend these findings by comparing the ability of the AMPD and alternative trait models to account for psychopathy. Analyses showed a partial replication of Wygant et al.'s findings, indicating that additional traits to account for psychopathy should be included in DSM-5 Section III. The current study was not preregistered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《美国精神病学会精神障碍诊断和统计手册》第五版中的精神病和反社会人格障碍:试图复制Wygant等人(2016)。
美国精神病学会(APA)第五版《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM-5)第三节人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)旨在通过从行为特异性标准的离散边界转移到基于混合维度特征的分类模型来改善DSM-5第二节分类模型的一些担忧方法Wygant等人(2016)研究了AMPD在多大程度上改善了反社会人格障碍的可操作性,使其与精神病更紧密地联系在一起,这是DSM-5第二节的一个显著弱点(Crego&Widiger,2015;Lynam&Vachon,2012;Strickland等人,2013)。Wygant等人发现,在200名男性囚犯的样本中,DSM-5第三节AMPD在预测精神病的各种操作方面优于第二节。本着探索复制的重要性(Tackett等人,2017),目前的研究试图通过比较AMPD和替代特征模型解释精神变态的能力来复制和扩展这些发现。分析显示,Wygant等人的研究结果部分重复,表明DSM-5第三节中应包括解释精神病的其他特征。目前的研究没有预先登记。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing the clinical utility of the alternative model for personality disorders to the Section II personality disorder model: A randomized controlled trial. Comparing the DSM-5 categorical model of personality disorders and the alternative model of personality disorders regarding clinician judgments of risk and outcome. Comparing the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, personality disorder models scored from the same interview. Longitudinal prediction of psychosocial functioning outcomes: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Section-II personality disorders versus alternative model personality dysfunction and traits. Prospective prediction of treatment outcomes in adolescents: A head-to-head comparison of alternative model for personality disorder versus borderline personality disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1