Effects of Moringa oleifera leaves on the blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipid profile of type 2 diabetic subjects: A parallel group randomized clinical trial of efficacy.

IF 1.4 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition and health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-25 DOI:10.1177/02601060231176873
Ifeoma C Afiaenyi, Elizabeth K Ngwu, Adaobi M Okafor, Rufina Nb Ayogu
{"title":"Effects of <i>Moringa oleifera</i> leaves on the blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipid profile of type 2 diabetic subjects: A parallel group randomized clinical trial of efficacy.","authors":"Ifeoma C Afiaenyi, Elizabeth K Ngwu, Adaobi M Okafor, Rufina Nb Ayogu","doi":"10.1177/02601060231176873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThere is a paucity of information on the antidiabetic potential of graded amounts of <i>Moringa</i> leaves on diabetes human subjects.AimTo ascertain the effeccts of <i>Moringa</i> leaves on type 2 diabetic subjects' blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipid profile levels in a rural Nigerian community.MethodsThis study adopted a parallel group randomized control design. Participants included 40 adult male and female diabetic subjects who met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate in the study. The participants were randomly assigned to four groups. The control group was fed diets without <i>Moringa oleifera</i> leaves while the experimental groups received 20, 40, and 60 g of <i>Moringa</i> leaves respectively daily for 14 days in addition to the diets. The subjects' baseline data and post-intervention data were collected before and after the intervention, respectively. Data were analyzed using paired-sample <i>t</i>-test and analysis of covariance. Significance was accepted at <i>p</i> < 0.05.ResultsThe mean fasting blood glucose levels in all the groups did not differ significantly from one another. Group 3 had significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.01) lower mean systolic pressure (from 136.40 ± 7.66 to 123.90 ± 13.82) after the intervention. Group 3 subjects had a significant (<i>p</i> = 0.04) increase in their triglyceride values (from 123.80 ± 53.69 before intervention to 151.20 ± 41.47) after intervention. After adjusting for the pre-intervention values, there was no significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05) difference in all the parameters at the end of the intervention.ConclusionThere were marginal improvements in the parameters assessed which were not dose-dependent.</p>","PeriodicalId":19352,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and health","volume":" ","pages":"281-291"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060231176873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThere is a paucity of information on the antidiabetic potential of graded amounts of Moringa leaves on diabetes human subjects.AimTo ascertain the effeccts of Moringa leaves on type 2 diabetic subjects' blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipid profile levels in a rural Nigerian community.MethodsThis study adopted a parallel group randomized control design. Participants included 40 adult male and female diabetic subjects who met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate in the study. The participants were randomly assigned to four groups. The control group was fed diets without Moringa oleifera leaves while the experimental groups received 20, 40, and 60 g of Moringa leaves respectively daily for 14 days in addition to the diets. The subjects' baseline data and post-intervention data were collected before and after the intervention, respectively. Data were analyzed using paired-sample t-test and analysis of covariance. Significance was accepted at p < 0.05.ResultsThe mean fasting blood glucose levels in all the groups did not differ significantly from one another. Group 3 had significantly (p = 0.01) lower mean systolic pressure (from 136.40 ± 7.66 to 123.90 ± 13.82) after the intervention. Group 3 subjects had a significant (p = 0.04) increase in their triglyceride values (from 123.80 ± 53.69 before intervention to 151.20 ± 41.47) after intervention. After adjusting for the pre-intervention values, there was no significant (p > 0.05) difference in all the parameters at the end of the intervention.ConclusionThere were marginal improvements in the parameters assessed which were not dose-dependent.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辣木叶对2型糖尿病患者血糖、血压和血脂的影响:疗效的平行组随机临床试验
背景:关于辣木叶分级剂量对糖尿病患者的降糖潜力的研究还很缺乏。目的探讨辣木叶对尼日利亚农村地区2型糖尿病患者血糖、血压和血脂水平的影响。方法采用平行组随机对照设计。参与者包括40名成年男性和女性糖尿病患者,他们符合纳入标准并同意参加研究。参与者被随机分为四组。对照组饲喂不添加辣木叶的饲粮,试验组在饲粮基础上分别添加20、40、60 g辣木叶,连续饲喂14 d。在干预前和干预后分别收集受试者的基线数据和干预后数据。数据分析采用配对样本t检验和协方差分析。干预后的平均收缩压(从136.40±7.66降至123.90±13.82)有显著性意义(p = 0.01)。3组患者的甘油三酯水平从干预前的123.80±53.69上升至干预后的151.20±41.47,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.04)。在调整干预前的数值后,干预结束时所有参数无显著差异(p > 0.05)。结论所评估的各项参数均有边际改善,且无剂量依赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition and health
Nutrition and health Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
期刊最新文献
Exploring nutrition counselors' perceptions of a 6-week Nutrition Intervention Program in Cameroon, Africa: A qualitative study using reflective journaling. Balancing protein intake: A randomized control trial of low, very low with alpha-ketoanalogue, and normal protein diets impact on quality of life in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients. Non-alcoholic Wernicke's encephalopathy in a thiamine-deficient population: A clinical and diagnostic perspective. An anthropometric profile of children younger than 36 months and food provisioning in early childhood development centres in Tutaleni informal settlement, Walvis Bay, Namibia. Exploring the acceptability of seaweed consumption among pregnant individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1