Determination of five times-sit-to-stand test performance in patients with multiple sclerosis: validity and reliability.

IF 1.3 4区医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Somatosensory and Motor Research Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1080/08990220.2022.2157395

Anıl Özüdoğru, Mehmet Canlı, Ömer Alperen Gürses, Halil Alkan, Aysu Yetiş

{"title":"Determination of five times-sit-to-stand test performance in patients with multiple sclerosis: validity and reliability.","authors":"Anıl Özüdoğru, Mehmet Canlı, Ömer Alperen Gürses, Halil Alkan, Aysu Yetiş","doi":"10.1080/08990220.2022.2157395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose/aim: Although Five Times-Sit-To-Stand test (FTSST) performance is known to be a valid and reliable method in people with chronic stroke, Parkinson's disease, and balance disorder, it has not been widely studied in patients with Multiple sclerosis (MS). The main aim of this study was to evaluate validity and reliability of the FTSST in patients with MS.Methods: The first outcome measure of the study was the FTSST, which was conducted by two different researchers. Secondary outcome measures were Biodex Stability System (BSS), 10-meter walk test, time up go test (TUG), EDSS scoring, Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Barthel Index, Quadriceps Muscle strength test, Functional Reach test. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for the validity and reliability of the FTSST, which was made by two different researchers, and Pearson Correlation Analysis was used to determine its relationship with other measurements.Results: Interrater and test-retest reliability for the FTSST were excellent (Intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.98 and 0.99, respectively). A statistically significant correlation was found between all secondary outcome measures and FTSST (p < 0.05).Conclusion: FTSST is considered to be a valid, reliable, easy, and rapid method for evaluating lower extremity muscle strength and balance in patients with MS.","PeriodicalId":49498,"journal":{"name":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","volume":"40 2","pages":"72-77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2022.2157395","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose/aim: Although Five Times-Sit-To-Stand test (FTSST) performance is known to be a valid and reliable method in people with chronic stroke, Parkinson's disease, and balance disorder, it has not been widely studied in patients with Multiple sclerosis (MS). The main aim of this study was to evaluate validity and reliability of the FTSST in patients with MS.

Methods: The first outcome measure of the study was the FTSST, which was conducted by two different researchers. Secondary outcome measures were Biodex Stability System (BSS), 10-meter walk test, time up go test (TUG), EDSS scoring, Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Barthel Index, Quadriceps Muscle strength test, Functional Reach test. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for the validity and reliability of the FTSST, which was made by two different researchers, and Pearson Correlation Analysis was used to determine its relationship with other measurements.

Results: Interrater and test-retest reliability for the FTSST were excellent (Intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.98 and 0.99, respectively). A statistically significant correlation was found between all secondary outcome measures and FTSST (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: FTSST is considered to be a valid, reliable, easy, and rapid method for evaluating lower extremity muscle strength and balance in patients with MS.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

多发性硬化症患者五次坐立测试的有效性和信度。

目的/目的:虽然五次坐立试验(FTSST)在慢性中风、帕金森病和平衡障碍患者中是一种有效可靠的方法，但在多发性硬化症(MS)患者中尚未得到广泛研究。本研究的主要目的是评估FTSST在多发性硬化症患者中的效度和信度。方法:本研究的第一个结果测量是FTSST，由两位不同的研究人员进行。次要观察指标为生物指数稳定性系统(BSS)、10米步行测试、时间上升测试(TUG)、EDSS评分、疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)、Barthel指数、股四头肌力量测试、功能到达测试。FTSST的效度和信度采用class内相关系数(Intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC)来衡量，其与其他测量的关系采用Pearson相关分析。结果:FTSST的解释信度和重测信度均较好(类内相关系数分别为0.98和0.99)。结论:FTSST被认为是一种有效、可靠、简便、快速的评估MS患者下肢肌肉力量和平衡的方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Somatosensory and Motor Research 医学-神经科学

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Somatosensory & Motor Research publishes original, high-quality papers that encompass the entire range of investigations related to the neural bases for somatic sensation, somatic motor function, somatic motor integration, and modeling thereof. Comprising anatomical, physiological, biochemical, pharmacological, behavioural, and psychophysical studies, Somatosensory & Motor Research covers all facets of the peripheral and central processes underlying cutaneous sensation, and includes studies relating to afferent and efferent mechanisms of deep structures (e.g., viscera, muscle). Studies of motor systems at all levels of the neuraxis are covered, but reports restricted to non-neural aspects of muscle generally would belong in other journals.