Radiation therapy post radical prostatectomy: who, when and why?

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1097/SPC.0000000000000627
Igor Latorzeff, Jennifer Le Guevelou, Paul Sargos
{"title":"Radiation therapy post radical prostatectomy: who, when and why?","authors":"Igor Latorzeff,&nbsp;Jennifer Le Guevelou,&nbsp;Paul Sargos","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>During decades, adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) has been the standard of care after surgery, based on four randomized clinical trials (RCTs). As early salvage radiotherapy (SRT) recently challenged the ART paradigm, the optimal timing to initiate radiotherapy remains a matter of debate.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Three RCTs evaluated ART or SRT for postprostatectomy patients, with pathological risk factors (Gleason score > 8, pT3, positive margins). The ARTISTIC meta-analysis demonstrated similar 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival for ART and SRT (89 vs. 88%). Lower rates of late genitourinary toxicity were demonstrated within the SRT arm, favouring early SRT in clinical practice.The addition of pelvic lymph node radiotherapy recently demonstrated an improvement in freedom from progression within the randomized RTOG 0534 trial, especially for patients with pretreatment prostate serum antigen (PSA) levels more than 0.35 ng/ml. The most appropriate androgen deprivation therapy duration remains a point of controversy.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The SRT approach can be favoured for the vast majority of patients, provided close monitoring of PSA and early treatment in the event of biochemical recurrence. Radiotherapy dose and volumes and ADT use might be correlated to SRT timing (early vs. late). Results from trials including genomic tests and metabolic imaging will probably help to refine these criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: During decades, adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) has been the standard of care after surgery, based on four randomized clinical trials (RCTs). As early salvage radiotherapy (SRT) recently challenged the ART paradigm, the optimal timing to initiate radiotherapy remains a matter of debate.

Recent findings: Three RCTs evaluated ART or SRT for postprostatectomy patients, with pathological risk factors (Gleason score > 8, pT3, positive margins). The ARTISTIC meta-analysis demonstrated similar 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival for ART and SRT (89 vs. 88%). Lower rates of late genitourinary toxicity were demonstrated within the SRT arm, favouring early SRT in clinical practice.The addition of pelvic lymph node radiotherapy recently demonstrated an improvement in freedom from progression within the randomized RTOG 0534 trial, especially for patients with pretreatment prostate serum antigen (PSA) levels more than 0.35 ng/ml. The most appropriate androgen deprivation therapy duration remains a point of controversy.

Summary: The SRT approach can be favoured for the vast majority of patients, provided close monitoring of PSA and early treatment in the event of biochemical recurrence. Radiotherapy dose and volumes and ADT use might be correlated to SRT timing (early vs. late). Results from trials including genomic tests and metabolic imaging will probably help to refine these criteria.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根治性前列腺切除术后的放射治疗:谁,何时,为什么?
回顾的目的:几十年来,基于四项随机临床试验(rct),辅助放疗(ART)一直是手术后的标准治疗。由于早期补救性放射治疗(SRT)最近挑战了抗逆转录病毒治疗范式,启动放射治疗的最佳时机仍然是一个有争议的问题。最近的发现:三个随机对照试验评估了ART或SRT治疗前列腺切除术后患者的病理危险因素(Gleason评分> 8,pT3,阳性边缘)。ART荟萃分析显示ART和SRT的5年生化无复发生存率相似(89% vs. 88%)。在SRT组中,晚期泌尿生殖系统毒性发生率较低,在临床实践中有利于早期SRT。在随机RTOG 0534试验中,骨盆淋巴结放疗的增加最近证明了自由进展的改善,特别是对于预处理前列腺血清抗原(PSA)水平超过0.35 ng/ml的患者。最合适的雄激素剥夺治疗持续时间仍然是一个有争议的问题。总结:SRT方法对绝大多数患者都是有利的,只要密切监测PSA并在生化复发时进行早期治疗。放疗剂量和体积以及ADT的使用可能与SRT的时间(早期和晚期)相关。包括基因组测试和代谢成像在内的试验结果可能有助于完善这些标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: A reader-friendly resource, Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care provides an up-to-date account of the most important advances in the field of supportive and palliative care. Each issue contains either two or three sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive coverage of all the key issues, including end-of-life management, gastrointestinal systems and respiratory problems. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
期刊最新文献
Advances in breathlessness support services for people with serious illness. Bridging the care gap: radiation therapy in elderly and frail cancer patients. The gut microbiome and the brain. Is there a role for capsaicin in Cancer pain management? Comparing the EORTC QLQ-LC13, EORTC QLQ-LC29, and the FACT-L for assessment of quality of life in patients with lung cancer - an updated systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1