首页 > 最新文献

Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care最新文献

英文 中文
Inhaled methoxyflurane in patients with cancer: current applications and future directions.
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000757
Henry C Y Wong, Sam Finkelstein, Partha Patel, Joel Finklestein, Shing Fung Lee, Muna Alkhaifi, Ronald Chow, Leon Rivlin

Purpose of review: Diagnosis and management of patients with suspected or confirmed cancers often require procedures which can cause significant anxiety, discomfort and pain. While intravenous sedation and strong opioids are effective, they could be risky in frail cancer patients with multiple comorbidities. Inhaled methoxyflurane (IMF) (Penthrox®) has been utilised as an analgesic for moderate to severe trauma pain for decades in emergency departments. This review article evaluates the latest evidence for the use of IMF in cancer-related procedures.

Recent findings: IMF has been recently shown to be effective in reducing pain and discomfort in patients receiving transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and removal of gynaecological brachytherapy applicators. Side effects of IMF are mild and transient. No recent report of severe toxicities such as cardiopulmonary suppression was observed.

Summary: IMF is a safe drug device combination that can reduce discomfort and improve treatment compliance with repeat procedures in cancer patients. Real-world studies should be performed to further evaluate its safety and quality of life in diverse cancer patient populations and guide patient selection.

{"title":"Inhaled methoxyflurane in patients with cancer: current applications and future directions.","authors":"Henry C Y Wong, Sam Finkelstein, Partha Patel, Joel Finklestein, Shing Fung Lee, Muna Alkhaifi, Ronald Chow, Leon Rivlin","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000757","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000757","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Diagnosis and management of patients with suspected or confirmed cancers often require procedures which can cause significant anxiety, discomfort and pain. While intravenous sedation and strong opioids are effective, they could be risky in frail cancer patients with multiple comorbidities. Inhaled methoxyflurane (IMF) (Penthrox®) has been utilised as an analgesic for moderate to severe trauma pain for decades in emergency departments. This review article evaluates the latest evidence for the use of IMF in cancer-related procedures.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>IMF has been recently shown to be effective in reducing pain and discomfort in patients receiving transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and removal of gynaecological brachytherapy applicators. Side effects of IMF are mild and transient. No recent report of severe toxicities such as cardiopulmonary suppression was observed.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>IMF is a safe drug device combination that can reduce discomfort and improve treatment compliance with repeat procedures in cancer patients. Real-world studies should be performed to further evaluate its safety and quality of life in diverse cancer patient populations and guide patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143765448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long COVID update: respiratory sequelae and symptoms. COVID 长期更新:呼吸系统后遗症和症状。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000755
Muhammad Mamoon Iqbal, Ayesha Iqbal, Rachael A Evans

Purpose of review: Long COVID affects approximately 6% of the population after SARS-CoV-2 infection commonly involving persistent respiratory symptoms such as breathlessness and cough. This review provides an update on the latest evidence regarding post-COVID condition/Long COVID and respiratory sequelae, focusing on persistent symptoms, respiratory complications, and therapeutic approaches to date.

Recent findings: Post-COVID interstitial lung abnormalities are estimated to persist in approximately 11% of patients hospitalized with acute COVID-19. However, breathlessness is common in adults (non-hospitalized) with Long COVID, suggesting aetiologies beyond pneumonitis. The risk of venous thromboembolic disease in Long COVID remains uncertain and trial results of anti-coagulation in Long COVID are awaited.

Summary: Long COVID presents complex respiratory challenges, and careful assessment is crucial to differentiate Long COVID symptoms from exacerbations of pre-existing respiratory conditions. Current management includes a symptom-based multidisciplinary approach, with ongoing research into effective treatments including immune modulating agents.

{"title":"Long COVID update: respiratory sequelae and symptoms.","authors":"Muhammad Mamoon Iqbal, Ayesha Iqbal, Rachael A Evans","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000755","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000755","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Long COVID affects approximately 6% of the population after SARS-CoV-2 infection commonly involving persistent respiratory symptoms such as breathlessness and cough. This review provides an update on the latest evidence regarding post-COVID condition/Long COVID and respiratory sequelae, focusing on persistent symptoms, respiratory complications, and therapeutic approaches to date.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Post-COVID interstitial lung abnormalities are estimated to persist in approximately 11% of patients hospitalized with acute COVID-19. However, breathlessness is common in adults (non-hospitalized) with Long COVID, suggesting aetiologies beyond pneumonitis. The risk of venous thromboembolic disease in Long COVID remains uncertain and trial results of anti-coagulation in Long COVID are awaited.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Long COVID presents complex respiratory challenges, and careful assessment is crucial to differentiate Long COVID symptoms from exacerbations of pre-existing respiratory conditions. Current management includes a symptom-based multidisciplinary approach, with ongoing research into effective treatments including immune modulating agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143765450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cough and dyspnea management in pulmonary fibrosis.
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000753
Allard van Veelen, Marlies S Wijsenbeek, Thomas Koudstaal

Purpose of the review: Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is characterized by relentless scarring of the lungs, declining lung function, and increasing symptom burden. In PF, dyspnea and cough are the most common symptoms, severely impacting quality of life. This review highlights recent advances in understanding their mechanisms and explores evolving strategies for management of these symptoms.

Recent findings: Advances in non-pharmacologic approaches, including hand-held fans, dyspnea services and pulmonary rehabilitation are playing a vital role in dyspnea management. Opioids, while effective in reducing exertional dyspnea in controlled settings, show limited benefit for daily life breathlessness and are associated with significant adverse events, highlighting the need for cautious, individualized use. For refractory cough, promising studies are investigating the role of opioids and neuromodulatory therapies. Non-pharmacologic approaches, including speech therapy, and behavioral interventions, provide complementary approaches. A multidisciplinary approach and individualized care plans to address the multifactorial nature of dyspnea and cough are key.

Summary: Effective management of dyspnea and cough can importantly improve patients' quality of life. Further research is required to refine treatment protocols, optimize palliative care interventions, and identify and test novel therapeutics. Translation of these findings into clinical practice requires a focus on evidence-based, patient-centered care.

{"title":"Cough and dyspnea management in pulmonary fibrosis.","authors":"Allard van Veelen, Marlies S Wijsenbeek, Thomas Koudstaal","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000753","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000753","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is characterized by relentless scarring of the lungs, declining lung function, and increasing symptom burden. In PF, dyspnea and cough are the most common symptoms, severely impacting quality of life. This review highlights recent advances in understanding their mechanisms and explores evolving strategies for management of these symptoms.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Advances in non-pharmacologic approaches, including hand-held fans, dyspnea services and pulmonary rehabilitation are playing a vital role in dyspnea management. Opioids, while effective in reducing exertional dyspnea in controlled settings, show limited benefit for daily life breathlessness and are associated with significant adverse events, highlighting the need for cautious, individualized use. For refractory cough, promising studies are investigating the role of opioids and neuromodulatory therapies. Non-pharmacologic approaches, including speech therapy, and behavioral interventions, provide complementary approaches. A multidisciplinary approach and individualized care plans to address the multifactorial nature of dyspnea and cough are key.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Effective management of dyspnea and cough can importantly improve patients' quality of life. Further research is required to refine treatment protocols, optimize palliative care interventions, and identify and test novel therapeutics. Translation of these findings into clinical practice requires a focus on evidence-based, patient-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143711710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative Care and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative in assessing the quality of life in patients with advanced cancer.
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000750
Paula Tur, Eva Oldenburger, Andrew Bottomley, David Cella, Shing Fung Lee, Adrian W Chan, Gustavo Nader Marta, Timothy Jacobs, Edward Chow, Henry C Y Wong, Agata Rembielak

Purpose of review: Two widely validated health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) tools, specifically designed for patients with advanced cancer, are the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative Care (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative (FACIT-Pal-14). This systematic review aims to evaluate the use of EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and FACIT-Pal-14 in prospective studies in patients with advanced cancer, focusing on study types, clinical settings, additional HR-QoL tools used, and completion rates.

Recent findings: Sixty studies were included in the analysis. Both EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and FACIT-Pal-14 are used in a variety of studies. Given that EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL was developed 9 years before FACIT-Pal-14 PAL, most studies utilized the EORTC tool. Both tools were shown to be successfully used in a variety of clinical settings, including in various advanced tumour types or different study designs, depending on the investigator and study needs.

Summary: This review demonstrates the wide range of utilization of EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and FACIT-Pal-14 in prospective studies to assess the HR-QoL issues in patients with advanced cancers.

{"title":"Evaluation of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative Care and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative in assessing the quality of life in patients with advanced cancer.","authors":"Paula Tur, Eva Oldenburger, Andrew Bottomley, David Cella, Shing Fung Lee, Adrian W Chan, Gustavo Nader Marta, Timothy Jacobs, Edward Chow, Henry C Y Wong, Agata Rembielak","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000750","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000750","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Two widely validated health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) tools, specifically designed for patients with advanced cancer, are the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative Care (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative (FACIT-Pal-14). This systematic review aims to evaluate the use of EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and FACIT-Pal-14 in prospective studies in patients with advanced cancer, focusing on study types, clinical settings, additional HR-QoL tools used, and completion rates.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Sixty studies were included in the analysis. Both EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and FACIT-Pal-14 are used in a variety of studies. Given that EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL was developed 9 years before FACIT-Pal-14 PAL, most studies utilized the EORTC tool. Both tools were shown to be successfully used in a variety of clinical settings, including in various advanced tumour types or different study designs, depending on the investigator and study needs.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This review demonstrates the wide range of utilization of EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and FACIT-Pal-14 in prospective studies to assess the HR-QoL issues in patients with advanced cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143606840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fan therapy for breathlessness - how do you do it and why?
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000752
Tim Luckett, Mary Roberts, Flavia Swan

Purpose of the review: This review summarises high-level evidence for fan therapy and adds a commentary on the relatively-neglected question of how to optimise benefits based on qualitative evidence, clinical experience and broader research and theory.

Recent findings: Recent high-level evidence suggests the fan reduces time to recovery from episodic breathlessness rather than reduces daily levels over a longer period. Lower grade evidence suggests the fan can also help people increase their physical activity. Experimental evidence for physiological mechanisms suggests that airflow reduces inspiratory neural drive and perceived unpleasantness through facial cooling of the trigeminal and olfactory nerves. Faster airflow elicits a stronger effect, with the optimal balance between efficacy and comfort proposed to be 2.85 metres per second. Research on clinician perspectives highlights the need for targeted strategies to drive fan implementation.

Summary: Fan therapy contributes to all three domains of the Breathing, Thinking, Functioning model of breathlessness management. Given it is affordable, portable, and has no known harms, the fan should be recommended as first-line therapy for anyone with breathlessness. Future research should evaluate how best to integrate fan therapy as a complex intervention alongside other strategies and supports.

{"title":"Fan therapy for breathlessness - how do you do it and why?","authors":"Tim Luckett, Mary Roberts, Flavia Swan","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000752","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000752","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>This review summarises high-level evidence for fan therapy and adds a commentary on the relatively-neglected question of how to optimise benefits based on qualitative evidence, clinical experience and broader research and theory.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent high-level evidence suggests the fan reduces time to recovery from episodic breathlessness rather than reduces daily levels over a longer period. Lower grade evidence suggests the fan can also help people increase their physical activity. Experimental evidence for physiological mechanisms suggests that airflow reduces inspiratory neural drive and perceived unpleasantness through facial cooling of the trigeminal and olfactory nerves. Faster airflow elicits a stronger effect, with the optimal balance between efficacy and comfort proposed to be 2.85 metres per second. Research on clinician perspectives highlights the need for targeted strategies to drive fan implementation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Fan therapy contributes to all three domains of the Breathing, Thinking, Functioning model of breathlessness management. Given it is affordable, portable, and has no known harms, the fan should be recommended as first-line therapy for anyone with breathlessness. Future research should evaluate how best to integrate fan therapy as a complex intervention alongside other strategies and supports.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143606867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Breathlessness in the general population.
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000751
Alexander Müller, Emiel F M Wouters, Daisy J A Janssen

Purpose of the review: Breathlessness is a prevalent symptom that significantly affects physical and mental health. While commonly associated with respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, breathlessness is increasingly recognised as a concern in the general population. This review summarises recent research on the prevalence, risk factors, assessment methods, and clinical and societal impact, with a focus on findings from the past 18 months.

Recent findings: Recent studies indicate that breathlessness affects a substantial proportion of adults worldwide, with prevalence varying across populations and regions. Identified risk factors include older age, female sex, high body mass index, smoking, and comorbidities such as respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Novel approaches in assessing breathlessness are looking beyond unidimensional scales to improve diagnostic accuracy. However, breathlessness remains underdiagnosed in clinical practice. Recent publications also show that breathlessness has a substantial impact on health outcomes of the affected person, but also imposes a burden on their informal caregivers, health care systems and the economy.

Summary: Despite progress in understanding chronic breathlessness, knowledge gaps persist, particularly regarding its assessment in large-population samples. Longitudinal studies are needed to understand risk factors for breathlessness and its impact on health outcomes and society.

{"title":"Breathlessness in the general population.","authors":"Alexander Müller, Emiel F M Wouters, Daisy J A Janssen","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000751","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000751","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>Breathlessness is a prevalent symptom that significantly affects physical and mental health. While commonly associated with respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, breathlessness is increasingly recognised as a concern in the general population. This review summarises recent research on the prevalence, risk factors, assessment methods, and clinical and societal impact, with a focus on findings from the past 18 months.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies indicate that breathlessness affects a substantial proportion of adults worldwide, with prevalence varying across populations and regions. Identified risk factors include older age, female sex, high body mass index, smoking, and comorbidities such as respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Novel approaches in assessing breathlessness are looking beyond unidimensional scales to improve diagnostic accuracy. However, breathlessness remains underdiagnosed in clinical practice. Recent publications also show that breathlessness has a substantial impact on health outcomes of the affected person, but also imposes a burden on their informal caregivers, health care systems and the economy.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Despite progress in understanding chronic breathlessness, knowledge gaps persist, particularly regarding its assessment in large-population samples. Longitudinal studies are needed to understand risk factors for breathlessness and its impact on health outcomes and society.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143558541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social determinants of health and health outcomes in older cancer survivors.
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000746
Zachary Siegel, Ashley Smith-Nuñez, Marquita W Lewis

Purpose of the review: Today, two-thirds of all cancer survivors are at least 65 years old. Older cancer survivors have complex care needs, and addressing their social determinants of health (SDoH) is critical for improving and managing survivorship outcomes for this uniquely vulnerable population, yet research specifically examining these associations remains limited and emergent. To this end, we describe the emergent body of evidence on the associations between SDoH domains and older cancer survivors' outcomes.

Recent findings: Despite the limited investigations of SDoH on the health outcomes of older cancer survivors, there were measures representing all domains of SDoH - health care access and quality, education access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, social and community context, and economic stability. We reviewed another determinant, Digital Environment and Engagement, as they are highly relevant to older cancer survivors' care. Studies primarily investigated outcomes such as the use of or delays in treatment and variables related to care coordination. Generally, poorer access to resources such as income, social networks, and quality health care facilities predicted poorer health outcomes.

Summary: We reviewed studies that revealed that SDoH significantly impacts older cancer survivors' health outcomes. Our description informs future interventions and policies to improve their care.

{"title":"Social determinants of health and health outcomes in older cancer survivors.","authors":"Zachary Siegel, Ashley Smith-Nuñez, Marquita W Lewis","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000746","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000746","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>Today, two-thirds of all cancer survivors are at least 65 years old. Older cancer survivors have complex care needs, and addressing their social determinants of health (SDoH) is critical for improving and managing survivorship outcomes for this uniquely vulnerable population, yet research specifically examining these associations remains limited and emergent. To this end, we describe the emergent body of evidence on the associations between SDoH domains and older cancer survivors' outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Despite the limited investigations of SDoH on the health outcomes of older cancer survivors, there were measures representing all domains of SDoH - health care access and quality, education access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, social and community context, and economic stability. We reviewed another determinant, Digital Environment and Engagement, as they are highly relevant to older cancer survivors' care. Studies primarily investigated outcomes such as the use of or delays in treatment and variables related to care coordination. Generally, poorer access to resources such as income, social networks, and quality health care facilities predicted poorer health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>We reviewed studies that revealed that SDoH significantly impacts older cancer survivors' health outcomes. Our description informs future interventions and policies to improve their care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143025168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Buprenorphine: an old dog with new tricks.
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000743
Ai Deen Ng, Andrew Dickman

Purpose of review: The survival rate of patients with a cancer or palliative care diagnosis has improved over the years although pain remains a debilitating symptom that many patients still require treatment with opioids. Compared to full mu-opioid receptor agonists such as morphine and oxycodone, buprenorphine continues to remain a second- or third-line choice in this group of patients.We have reviewed the pharmacology and clinical utility of buprenorphine to stimulate debate around the first-line use of buprenorphine in the management of pain in cancer patients.

Recent findings: Buprenorphine has a pharmacological profile that is unique and unlike any other opioid. It is associated with many immediate and long-term benefits, with lower risks of adverse effects that make it an ideal first-line choice in the management of cancer pain.

Summary: Buprenorphine appears to be a promising choice of opioid for cancer patients. Studies have found that buprenorphine is a safe and effective choice for many patients, making it a suitable first-line option for the management of cancer pain.

{"title":"Buprenorphine: an old dog with new tricks.","authors":"Ai Deen Ng, Andrew Dickman","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000743","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000743","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The survival rate of patients with a cancer or palliative care diagnosis has improved over the years although pain remains a debilitating symptom that many patients still require treatment with opioids. Compared to full mu-opioid receptor agonists such as morphine and oxycodone, buprenorphine continues to remain a second- or third-line choice in this group of patients.We have reviewed the pharmacology and clinical utility of buprenorphine to stimulate debate around the first-line use of buprenorphine in the management of pain in cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Buprenorphine has a pharmacological profile that is unique and unlike any other opioid. It is associated with many immediate and long-term benefits, with lower risks of adverse effects that make it an ideal first-line choice in the management of cancer pain.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Buprenorphine appears to be a promising choice of opioid for cancer patients. Studies have found that buprenorphine is a safe and effective choice for many patients, making it a suitable first-line option for the management of cancer pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":"19 1","pages":"59-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143071252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-world implementation of geriatric assessment in cancer care among older adults: the role of implementation science frameworks.
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000740
Irene Blackberry, Jennifer Boak, Tshepo Rasekaba, Christopher Steer

Purpose of review: The evidence supporting geriatric assessment (GA) in cancer care is well established, and GA is recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the International Society of Geriatric Oncology, and other oncology bodies. However, effective implementation of GA remains inadequate. Using selected papers indexed in Medline from the most recent 18 months to July 2024, including two outstanding interest papers, this review aimed to describe enablers and barriers to GA implementation in oncology and contrasts implementation with and without an implementation science framework. Finally, we make recommendations on applying an implementation science framework to facilitate integrating GA in oncology.

Recent findings: Implementation science frameworks have been widely employed in health services research, but their use in geriatric oncology, particularly to guide GA implementation and evaluation, is limited. Lack of time in busy practices coupled with workforce shortages adds to the challenges of GA implementation and adoption. A variety of screening and assessment tools such as the G8, electronic rapid fitness assessment, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group are often used in lieu of geriatrician review and to streamline GA. When effectively implemented in oncology, GA informs care and treatment decisions for improved outcomes.

Summary: Despite the benefits for older adults, embedding GA into routine clinical practice is critical yet not common practice. The variety of available GA tools, logistics, and individual beliefs are some of the identified barriers to GA adoption in oncology. Enablers include organization readiness, adaptability, communication, and the use of multidisciplinary teams. Further research is needed to examine how implementation science frameworks could provide guidance and structure for successful GA implementation in oncology.

{"title":"Real-world implementation of geriatric assessment in cancer care among older adults: the role of implementation science frameworks.","authors":"Irene Blackberry, Jennifer Boak, Tshepo Rasekaba, Christopher Steer","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000740","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000740","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The evidence supporting geriatric assessment (GA) in cancer care is well established, and GA is recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the International Society of Geriatric Oncology, and other oncology bodies. However, effective implementation of GA remains inadequate. Using selected papers indexed in Medline from the most recent 18 months to July 2024, including two outstanding interest papers, this review aimed to describe enablers and barriers to GA implementation in oncology and contrasts implementation with and without an implementation science framework. Finally, we make recommendations on applying an implementation science framework to facilitate integrating GA in oncology.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Implementation science frameworks have been widely employed in health services research, but their use in geriatric oncology, particularly to guide GA implementation and evaluation, is limited. Lack of time in busy practices coupled with workforce shortages adds to the challenges of GA implementation and adoption. A variety of screening and assessment tools such as the G8, electronic rapid fitness assessment, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group are often used in lieu of geriatrician review and to streamline GA. When effectively implemented in oncology, GA informs care and treatment decisions for improved outcomes.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Despite the benefits for older adults, embedding GA into routine clinical practice is critical yet not common practice. The variety of available GA tools, logistics, and individual beliefs are some of the identified barriers to GA adoption in oncology. Enablers include organization readiness, adaptability, communication, and the use of multidisciplinary teams. Further research is needed to examine how implementation science frameworks could provide guidance and structure for successful GA implementation in oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":"19 1","pages":"12-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143071276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The use of precision radiotherapy for the management of cancer-related pain in the abdomen. 精确放疗在治疗癌性腹痛中的应用。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000738
Aisling M Glynn, Yaacov R Lawrence, Laura A Dawson, Aisling S Barry

Purpose of review: Abdominal pain due to cancer is a significant and debilitating symptom for cancer patients, which is commonly undertreated. Radiotherapy (RT) for the management of abdominal cancer pain is underused, with limited awareness of its benefit. This review presents a discussion on current precision RT options for the management of cancer pain in the abdomen.

Recent findings: Precision RT focuses on delivering targeted and effective radiation doses while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues. In patients with primary or secondary liver cancer, RT has been shown to significantly improve liver related cancer pain in the majority of patients. Also, symptom sequelae of tumour thrombus may be relieved with the use of palliative RT. Similarly, single dose, high precision stereotactic RT to the celiac plexus has been shown to significantly improve pain in patients with pancreatic cancer. Pain response for adrenal metastases has been less commonly investigated, but small series suggest that stereotactic body RT may reduce or alleviate pain.

Summary: RT is an effective option for the treatment of abdominal cancer pain. RT should be considered within the multidisciplinary treatment armamentarium, and may be successfully integrated, alone or in conjunction with other treatment modalities, in abdominal cancer-related pain.

审查目的:癌症引起的腹痛是癌症患者的一个重要且令人衰弱的症状,但通常治疗不足。放射治疗(RT)在治疗腹部癌痛方面的应用不足,人们对其益处的认识有限。本综述讨论了目前治疗腹部癌痛的精确 RT 选项:精确放射治疗的重点在于提供有针对性的有效放射剂量,同时尽量减少对周围健康组织的损伤。在原发性或继发性肝癌患者中,大多数患者的肝脏相关癌痛都能通过 RT 得到明显改善。此外,姑息性 RT 还可缓解肿瘤血栓的后遗症症状。同样,对腹腔神经丛进行单剂量、高精度的立体定向 RT 也能明显改善胰腺癌患者的疼痛。对肾上腺转移瘤的疼痛反应研究较少,但小型系列研究表明,体部立体定向 RT 可以减轻或缓解疼痛:总结:RT 是治疗腹部癌痛的有效方法。应在多学科治疗方案中考虑 RT,RT 可单独或与其他治疗方式成功结合,用于腹部癌症相关疼痛的治疗。
{"title":"The use of precision radiotherapy for the management of cancer-related pain in the abdomen.","authors":"Aisling M Glynn, Yaacov R Lawrence, Laura A Dawson, Aisling S Barry","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000738","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000738","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Abdominal pain due to cancer is a significant and debilitating symptom for cancer patients, which is commonly undertreated. Radiotherapy (RT) for the management of abdominal cancer pain is underused, with limited awareness of its benefit. This review presents a discussion on current precision RT options for the management of cancer pain in the abdomen.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Precision RT focuses on delivering targeted and effective radiation doses while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues. In patients with primary or secondary liver cancer, RT has been shown to significantly improve liver related cancer pain in the majority of patients. Also, symptom sequelae of tumour thrombus may be relieved with the use of palliative RT. Similarly, single dose, high precision stereotactic RT to the celiac plexus has been shown to significantly improve pain in patients with pancreatic cancer. Pain response for adrenal metastases has been less commonly investigated, but small series suggest that stereotactic body RT may reduce or alleviate pain.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>RT is an effective option for the treatment of abdominal cancer pain. RT should be considered within the multidisciplinary treatment armamentarium, and may be successfully integrated, alone or in conjunction with other treatment modalities, in abdominal cancer-related pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142820016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1