Should All Patients with Barrett's Esophagus Receive Ablation?

Abstract

Purpose of review: The aim of this paper is to review and assess the appropriateness of eradication of nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus is a known predictor for the development of esophageal cancer, and is currently the best marker in aiding the decision making regarding treatment options. Current data supports endoscopic eradication therapy for most patients with dysplastic Barrett's. The controversy, however, lies in the management of nondysplastic Barrett's and when to recommend ablation versus ongoing surveillance.

Recent findings: There have been increasing efforts to identify factors that can help predict which patients with nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus are at increased risk for cancer progression, and to quantify that risk. While there is currently varying data and literature supporting this, a more objective risk score is likely to soon become available and accepted, in an effort to differentiate between low and high risk nondysplastic Barrett's, and better aid in decision making regarding surveillance versus endoscopic eradication. This article reviews the current data on Barrett's esophagus and its risk for cancer progression, and it outlines several factors which impact progression that should be considered in the management approach to nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus.