Capability of Children with Hearing Devices: A Mixed Methods Study.

IF 1.7 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education Pub Date : 2023-09-18 DOI:10.1093/deafed/enad010
Wouter J Rijke, Anneke M Vermeulen, Christina Willeboer, Harry E T Knoors, Margreet C Langereis, Gert Jan van der Wilt
{"title":"Capability of Children with Hearing Devices: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Wouter J Rijke,&nbsp;Anneke M Vermeulen,&nbsp;Christina Willeboer,&nbsp;Harry E T Knoors,&nbsp;Margreet C Langereis,&nbsp;Gert Jan van der Wilt","doi":"10.1093/deafed/enad010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated 34 deaf and hard-of-hearing children with hearing devices aged 8-12 years and 30 typical hearing peers. We used the capability approach to assess well-being in both groups through interviews. Capability is \"the real freedom people have to do and to be what they have reason to value.\" Speech perception, phonology, and receptive vocabulary data of the deaf and hard-of-hearing children, that were used retrospectively, showed a large variability. The analysis of the relation between clinical quantitative outcome measures and qualitative capability interview outcomes suggests that at this age, differences in clinical performance do not appear to translate into considerable differences in capability, including capability did offer insight into the factors that appeared to ensure this equivalence of capability. We argue that capability outcomes should be used to determine the focus of (auditory) rehabilitation and support, in line with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.</p>","PeriodicalId":47768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10516458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enad010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated 34 deaf and hard-of-hearing children with hearing devices aged 8-12 years and 30 typical hearing peers. We used the capability approach to assess well-being in both groups through interviews. Capability is "the real freedom people have to do and to be what they have reason to value." Speech perception, phonology, and receptive vocabulary data of the deaf and hard-of-hearing children, that were used retrospectively, showed a large variability. The analysis of the relation between clinical quantitative outcome measures and qualitative capability interview outcomes suggests that at this age, differences in clinical performance do not appear to translate into considerable differences in capability, including capability did offer insight into the factors that appeared to ensure this equivalence of capability. We argue that capability outcomes should be used to determine the focus of (auditory) rehabilitation and support, in line with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童使用助听器的能力:一项混合方法研究。
我们调查了34名8-12岁的聋哑和重听儿童和30名典型的听力同龄人。我们使用能力方法通过访谈来评估两组人的幸福感。能力是“人们必须做的真正的自由,成为他们有理由重视的人。”回顾性使用的聋人和重听儿童的言语感知、音韵学和接受性词汇数据显示出很大的可变性。对临床定量结果测量和定性能力访谈结果之间关系的分析表明,在这个年龄段,临床表现的差异似乎不会转化为能力的显著差异,包括能力确实提供了对似乎确保能力对等的因素的深入了解。我们认为,应根据《联合国儿童权利公约》,利用能力成果来确定(听觉)康复和支持的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal integrating and coordinating basic and applied research relating to individuals who are deaf, including cultural, developmental, linguistic, and educational topics. JDSDE addresses issues of current and future concern to allied fields, encouraging interdisciplinary discussion. The journal promises a forum that is timely, of high quality, and accessible to researchers, educators, and lay audiences. Instructions for contributors appear at the back of each issue.
期刊最新文献
DHH and L2 college students' knowledge of English resultatives and depictives. Challenging the "norm": a critical look at deaf-hearing comparison studies in research. "I Learned as I Went": an online distance education case study. It all made sense: ASL-first approach in classroom practice. A comparative study of how teachers communicate in deaf education classrooms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1