Ananda Gomes de Oliveira, Rafael Santos Rocha, Manuela da Silva Spinola, Graziela Ribeiro Batista, Eduardo Bresciani, Taciana Marco Ferraz Caneppele
{"title":"Surface smoothness of resin composites after polishing—A systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro studies","authors":"Ananda Gomes de Oliveira, Rafael Santos Rocha, Manuela da Silva Spinola, Graziela Ribeiro Batista, Eduardo Bresciani, Taciana Marco Ferraz Caneppele","doi":"10.1111/eos.12921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed to provide evidence for the best polishing protocol for different types of resin composites to minimize surface roughness. A search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, BBO, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library on July 2, 2019 (updated in December, 2020). In vitro studies that included at least two systems for polishing resin composites and analyzed surface roughness were included. The risk of bias was evaluated. A random-effects Bayesian-mixed treatment comparison model was used to compare surface roughness in resin composites with the different types of polishers. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis was performed to rank the probability for the best polishing system. After removal of duplicates, title and abstract screening yielded 34 studies. Network meta-analysis was not possible for hybrid and microhybrid composites. SUCRA analysis showed that abrasive paper discs allowed greater surface smoothness for nanohybrid and nanofill composites to a probability of between 83% and 91.6%. Silicon carbide brush had a 78.2% probability of being the best system for microfill composites. The use of abrasive paper disc polishers showed a favorable result in nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites. Silicon carbide brush has a greater chance of promoting a smoother surface for microfill resin composites.</p>","PeriodicalId":11983,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"131 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eos.12921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
A systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed to provide evidence for the best polishing protocol for different types of resin composites to minimize surface roughness. A search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, BBO, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library on July 2, 2019 (updated in December, 2020). In vitro studies that included at least two systems for polishing resin composites and analyzed surface roughness were included. The risk of bias was evaluated. A random-effects Bayesian-mixed treatment comparison model was used to compare surface roughness in resin composites with the different types of polishers. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis was performed to rank the probability for the best polishing system. After removal of duplicates, title and abstract screening yielded 34 studies. Network meta-analysis was not possible for hybrid and microhybrid composites. SUCRA analysis showed that abrasive paper discs allowed greater surface smoothness for nanohybrid and nanofill composites to a probability of between 83% and 91.6%. Silicon carbide brush had a 78.2% probability of being the best system for microfill composites. The use of abrasive paper disc polishers showed a favorable result in nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites. Silicon carbide brush has a greater chance of promoting a smoother surface for microfill resin composites.
通过系统回顾和网络荟萃分析,为不同类型树脂复合材料的最佳抛光方案提供证据,以最大限度地减少表面粗糙度。检索于2019年7月2日(更新于2020年12月)在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、LILACS、BBO、EMBASE和Cochrane Library中进行。包括至少两种抛光树脂复合材料系统和分析表面粗糙度的体外研究。评估偏倚风险。采用随机效应贝叶斯混合处理比较模型,比较了不同抛光剂对树脂复合材料表面粗糙度的影响。对表面进行累积排序曲线(SUCRA)分析,得出最佳抛光系统的排序概率。在去除重复项后,标题和摘要筛选产生了34项研究。网络荟萃分析不可能用于混合和微混合复合材料。SUCRA分析表明,磨料纸圆盘可以提高纳米杂化和纳米填充复合材料的表面平滑度,其概率在83%到91.6%之间。碳化硅电刷有78.2%的可能性是微填充复合材料的最佳体系。磨料纸圆盘抛光机在纳米填料和纳米杂化树脂复合材料中的应用取得了良好的效果。碳化硅刷有更大的机会促进微填充树脂复合材料表面光滑。
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Oral Sciences is an international journal which publishes original research papers within clinical dentistry, on all basic science aspects of structure, chemistry, developmental biology, physiology and pathology of relevant tissues, as well as on microbiology, biomaterials and the behavioural sciences as they relate to dentistry. In general, analytical studies are preferred to descriptive ones. Reviews, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor will also be considered for publication.
The journal is published bimonthly.