Checking IN: Development, Acceptability, and Feasibility of a Pediatric Electronic Distress Screener.

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-11 DOI:10.1037/cpp0000450
Lori Wiener, Sima Z Bedoya, Mallorie Gordon, Abigail Fry, Robert Casey, Amii Steele, Kathy Ruble, Devon Ciampa, Maryland Pao
{"title":"Checking IN: Development, Acceptability, and Feasibility of a Pediatric Electronic Distress Screener.","authors":"Lori Wiener, Sima Z Bedoya, Mallorie Gordon, Abigail Fry, Robert Casey, Amii Steele, Kathy Ruble, Devon Ciampa, Maryland Pao","doi":"10.1037/cpp0000450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chronic illness in children and adolescents is associated with significant stress and risk of psychosocial problems. In busy pediatric clinics, limited time and resources are significant barriers to providing mental health assessment for every child. A brief, real-time self-report measure of psychosocial problems is needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic distress screening tool, <i>Checking IN</i>, for ages 8-21 was developed in 3 phases. Phase I used semi-structured cognitive interviews (N = 47) to test the wording of items assessing emotional, physical, social, practical, and spiritual concerns of pediatric patients. Findings informed the development of the final measure and an electronic platform (Phase II). Phase III used semi-structured interviews (N = 134) to assess child, caregiver and researcher perception of the feasibility, acceptability, and barriers of administering <i>Checking IN</i> in the outpatient setting at 4 sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients and caregivers rated <i>Checking IN</i> as \"easy\" or \"very easy\" to complete, \"feasible\" or \"somewhat feasible,\" and the time to complete the measure as acceptable. Most providers (n = 68) reported <i>Checking IN</i> elicited clinically useful and novel information. Fifty-four percent changed care for their patient based on the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><i>Checking IN</i> is a versatile and brief distress screener that is acceptable to youth with chronic illness and feasible to administer. The summary report provides immediate clinically meaningful data. Electronic tools like <i>Checking IN</i> can capture a child's current psychosocial wellbeing in a standardized, consistent, and useful way, while allowing for the automation of triaging referrals and psychosocial documentation during outpatient visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":37641,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10211261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cpp0000450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Chronic illness in children and adolescents is associated with significant stress and risk of psychosocial problems. In busy pediatric clinics, limited time and resources are significant barriers to providing mental health assessment for every child. A brief, real-time self-report measure of psychosocial problems is needed.

Methods: An electronic distress screening tool, Checking IN, for ages 8-21 was developed in 3 phases. Phase I used semi-structured cognitive interviews (N = 47) to test the wording of items assessing emotional, physical, social, practical, and spiritual concerns of pediatric patients. Findings informed the development of the final measure and an electronic platform (Phase II). Phase III used semi-structured interviews (N = 134) to assess child, caregiver and researcher perception of the feasibility, acceptability, and barriers of administering Checking IN in the outpatient setting at 4 sites.

Results: Most patients and caregivers rated Checking IN as "easy" or "very easy" to complete, "feasible" or "somewhat feasible," and the time to complete the measure as acceptable. Most providers (n = 68) reported Checking IN elicited clinically useful and novel information. Fifty-four percent changed care for their patient based on the results.

Conclusions: Checking IN is a versatile and brief distress screener that is acceptable to youth with chronic illness and feasible to administer. The summary report provides immediate clinically meaningful data. Electronic tools like Checking IN can capture a child's current psychosocial wellbeing in a standardized, consistent, and useful way, while allowing for the automation of triaging referrals and psychosocial documentation during outpatient visits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
入住:儿科电子压力筛查器的开发、可接受性和可行性。
目的:儿童和青少年的慢性疾病与巨大的压力和社会心理问题风险有关。在繁忙的儿科诊所,有限的时间和资源是为每个儿童提供心理健康评估的重大障碍。我们需要一种简短、实时的自我报告心理社会问题的测量方法:方法:我们分三个阶段开发了一款适用于 8-21 岁儿童的电子心理困扰筛查工具 Checking IN。第一阶段使用半结构化认知访谈(N = 47)来测试评估儿科患者的情绪、身体、社交、实践和精神问题的项目措辞。研究结果为最终测量方法和电子平台的开发提供了依据(第二阶段)。第三阶段采用半结构式访谈(N = 134)评估儿童、护理人员和研究人员对在 4 个地点的门诊环境中实施 "检查 IN "的可行性、可接受性和障碍的看法:大多数患者和护理者认为 "IN 检查""容易 "或 "非常容易 "完成,"可行 "或 "有点可行",完成测量的时间可以接受。大多数医疗服务提供者(n = 68)称 "检查 IN "获得了临床有用的新信息。54%的医疗服务提供者根据结果改变了对病人的护理:Checking IN 是一种多功能、简短的困扰筛查工具,慢性病青少年可以接受,并且易于实施。总结报告可立即提供有临床意义的数据。Checking IN 等电子工具能以标准化、一致和有用的方式捕捉儿童当前的社会心理健康状况,同时还能在门诊就诊时自动分流转诊和记录社会心理状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology
Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology® publishes articles representing the professional and applied activities of pediatric psychology. The journal comprehensively describes the breadth and richness of the field in its diverse activities;complements the scientific development of the field with information on the applied/clinical side;provides modeling that addresses the ways practicing pediatric psychologists incorporate empirical literature into day-to-day activities;emphasizes work that incorporates and cites evidence from the science base; andprovides a forum for those engaged in primarily clinical activities to report on their activities and inform future research activities. Articles include a range of formats such as commentaries, reviews, and clinical case reports in addition to more traditional empirical clinical studies. Articles address issues such as: professional and training activities in pediatric psychology and interprofessional functioning;funding/reimbursement patterns and the evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of clinical services;program development;organization of clinical services and workforce analyses;applications of evidence based interventions in "real world" settings with particular attention to potential barriers and solutions and considerations of diverse populations;critical analyses of professional practice issues;clinical innovations, e.g., emerging use of technology in clinical practice;case studies, particularly case studies that have enough detail to be replicated and that provide a basis for larger scale intervention studies; andorganizational, state and federal policies as they impact the practice of pediatric psychology, with a particular emphasis on changes due to health care reform.
期刊最新文献
Adherence in young people living with juvenile arthritis: A systematic review. Racial match: Black youth and pediatric integrated primary care. Acceptance and commitment therapy-based intervention for parents living with chronic pain: Feasibility and acceptability study. Participation in organized physical activity and discomfort with locker rooms among youth across sexual, gender, and racial identities. Ethical and psychological considerations for posthumous-assisted reproduction for adolescents and young adults with poor cancer prognosis in the context of grief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1