In vitro comparative study of antimicrobial efficacy of endodontic sealers against common pathogens in the dental pulp.

Q2 Dentistry Journal of Conservative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-16 DOI:10.4103/jcd.jcd_557_22
Ahana Shetty, K V Anand, Namith Rai, Ashish Shetty, K Pradeep, A Arvind Kumar
{"title":"<i>In vitro</i> comparative study of antimicrobial efficacy of endodontic sealers against common pathogens in the dental pulp.","authors":"Ahana Shetty,&nbsp;K V Anand,&nbsp;Namith Rai,&nbsp;Ashish Shetty,&nbsp;K Pradeep,&nbsp;A Arvind Kumar","doi":"10.4103/jcd.jcd_557_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Overview: </strong>Different types of bacterial species, <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> (<i>E. faecalis</i>), <i>Fusobacterium nucleatum</i> (<i>F. nucleatum</i>), and <i>Porphyromonas gingivalis</i> (<i>P. gingivalis</i>), cause pulpal and periradicular diseases. Hence, the antibacterial efficacy of endodontic sealers is of utmost importance from a clinical point of view.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The main objective of the study is to test the antibacterial efficacy of endodontic sealers against endo microflora belonging to <i>E. faecalis</i>, <i>F. nucleatum</i>, and <i>P. gingivalis</i> species.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The antibacterial effectiveness of five endodontic sealers (AH plus, Apexit, EndoRez, Endomethasone, and Tubliseal) was tested by means of the agar-diffusion test (ADT) and direct contact test (DCT). The bacterial suspension of individual microorganisms was applied separately onto the agar plates for ADT. Subsequently, freshly mixed and set sealer was applied on to the sterile discs. After 48 h of incubation, the inhibition zones were measured. For DCT, the sealers were put in 96-well cell culture plates and overlaid with bacterial suspension and brain heart infusion broth. The bacterial growth density of the liquid was tested by spectrophotometry at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 24 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data were analyzed using ANOVA and <i>post hoc</i> Turkey's test. The present study showed that Endomethasone and AH Plus had a good antibacterial effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the ADT and DCT, Endomethasone showed the greatest antimicrobial effect against <i>E. faecalis</i> when compared to other endodontic sealers. In the ADT, Apexit had no antimicrobial effect on <i>E. faecalis</i>, whereas AH Plus had the greatest antibacterial effect on <i>F. nucleatum</i> and <i>P gingivalis</i>. Whereas in DCT, EndoRez and Endomethasone showed the greatest effect against <i>F. nucleatum</i> and <i>P. gingivalis</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":38892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","volume":"26 2","pages":"216-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10190082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_557_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Overview: Different types of bacterial species, Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis), Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum), and Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), cause pulpal and periradicular diseases. Hence, the antibacterial efficacy of endodontic sealers is of utmost importance from a clinical point of view.

Aim: The main objective of the study is to test the antibacterial efficacy of endodontic sealers against endo microflora belonging to E. faecalis, F. nucleatum, and P. gingivalis species.

Materials and methods: The antibacterial effectiveness of five endodontic sealers (AH plus, Apexit, EndoRez, Endomethasone, and Tubliseal) was tested by means of the agar-diffusion test (ADT) and direct contact test (DCT). The bacterial suspension of individual microorganisms was applied separately onto the agar plates for ADT. Subsequently, freshly mixed and set sealer was applied on to the sterile discs. After 48 h of incubation, the inhibition zones were measured. For DCT, the sealers were put in 96-well cell culture plates and overlaid with bacterial suspension and brain heart infusion broth. The bacterial growth density of the liquid was tested by spectrophotometry at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 24 h.

Results: The data were analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc Turkey's test. The present study showed that Endomethasone and AH Plus had a good antibacterial effect.

Conclusion: In the ADT and DCT, Endomethasone showed the greatest antimicrobial effect against E. faecalis when compared to other endodontic sealers. In the ADT, Apexit had no antimicrobial effect on E. faecalis, whereas AH Plus had the greatest antibacterial effect on F. nucleatum and P gingivalis. Whereas in DCT, EndoRez and Endomethasone showed the greatest effect against F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙髓病封闭剂对牙髓常见病原体抗菌效果的体外比较研究。
概述:不同类型的细菌,粪肠球菌(E.faecalis)、有核梭杆菌(F.nucleanum)和牙龈卟啉单胞菌(P.gingivalis),会引起牙髓和根周疾病。因此,从临床角度来看,牙髓病封闭剂的抗菌效果至关重要。目的:本研究的主要目的是测试根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌、有核F.nucleanum和牙龈卟啉单胞菌的抗菌效果。材料和方法:采用琼脂扩散试验(ADT)和直接接触试验(DCT)测试了5种根管封闭剂(AH-plus、Apexit、EndoRez、Endomethasone和Tubliseal)的抗菌效果。将单个微生物的细菌悬浮液分别施加到用于ADT的琼脂平板上。随后,将新鲜混合并凝固的密封剂涂抹在无菌圆盘上。培养48小时后,测量抑制区。对于DCT,将密封剂放入96孔细胞培养板中,并覆盖细菌悬浮液和脑心灌注肉汤。通过分光光度法在0、2、4、6和24小时测试液体的细菌生长密度。结果:使用ANOVA和事后土耳其检验分析数据。本研究表明,内米松和AH-Plus具有良好的抗菌效果。结论:在ADT和DCT中,与其他根管封闭剂相比,内米松对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果最好。在ADT中,Apexit对粪肠球菌没有抗菌作用,而AH-Plus对有核F.nucleanum和牙龈卟啉单胞菌的抗菌作用最大。而在DCT中,EndoRez和Endomethasone对有核念珠菌和牙龈卟啉单胞菌的效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Journal of Conservative Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal of Conservative Dentistry (ISSN - 0972-0707) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics (IACDE). Our journal publishes scientific articles, case reports, short communications, invited reviews and comparative studies evaluating materials and methods in the fields of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics. J Conserv Dent has a diverse readership that includes full-time clinicians, full-time academicians, residents, students and scientists. Effective communication with this diverse readership requires careful attention to writing style.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Adding Epigallocatechin-3-gallate on the Porosity of Calcium Hydroxide Determination of gamma radiation sterilization dose on bioceramic BCP-Sr-Ag as bone graft according to ISO 11137 standards Compressive strength of nanohybrid composite resin after the application of glycerin immersed in fermented milk Differences in the solubility of CaCO3 from blood clam shells and Ca(OH)2 as a candidate pulp capping material Effective Dose of Nano Propolis as Anti-Pain in Animal Models of Mus Musculus Using Writhing Test Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1