Does the residual displacement of pelvic ring affect the functional outcome in pelvic ring injures?

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Mohak Kataria, Sameer Aggarwal, Vikas Bachhal, Karan Jindal, Ajay Appajigowda
{"title":"Does the residual displacement of pelvic ring affect the functional outcome in pelvic ring injures?","authors":"Mohak Kataria,&nbsp;Sameer Aggarwal,&nbsp;Vikas Bachhal,&nbsp;Karan Jindal,&nbsp;Ajay Appajigowda","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The effects of residual displacement on the functional outcome of the patient are not distinctly known and the acceptability criteria of residual displacement of the pelvic ring remain disputed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of residual displacement on functional outcome in pelvic ring injuries.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 49 patients with pelvic ring injuries (both operative and non-operative) were followed up for six months. Anteroposterior (AP), Vertical and rotational displacements were measured at admission, after surgery and at six months. Resultant displacement (vector addition of AP and vertical displacement) was taken for comparison. Displacement was graded as excellent, good, fair and poor according to Matta's criteria. Functional outcome assessment was done at six months using Majeed score. Work adjusted Majeed score was calculated for non-working patients by taking the percentage score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We compared the means of residual displacement with functional outcome (Excellent/Good/Fair) and found that there was no significant difference between the groups in operative (P=0.33) or non-operative patients (P=0.09). This showed that patients with relatively higher residual displacement also had satisfactory functional outcomes. The functional outcomes were compared after dividing the residual displacement into 2 groups: <10 mm and >10 mm and no significant difference was found in outcomes for either operative or non-operative patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Up to 10 mm of residual displacement is acceptable in pelvic ring injuries. More prospective studies with a longer follow up are needed for determination of correlation between reduction and functional outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":"13 2","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195215/pdf/ijbt0013-0044.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The effects of residual displacement on the functional outcome of the patient are not distinctly known and the acceptability criteria of residual displacement of the pelvic ring remain disputed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of residual displacement on functional outcome in pelvic ring injuries.

Materials and methods: A total of 49 patients with pelvic ring injuries (both operative and non-operative) were followed up for six months. Anteroposterior (AP), Vertical and rotational displacements were measured at admission, after surgery and at six months. Resultant displacement (vector addition of AP and vertical displacement) was taken for comparison. Displacement was graded as excellent, good, fair and poor according to Matta's criteria. Functional outcome assessment was done at six months using Majeed score. Work adjusted Majeed score was calculated for non-working patients by taking the percentage score.

Results: We compared the means of residual displacement with functional outcome (Excellent/Good/Fair) and found that there was no significant difference between the groups in operative (P=0.33) or non-operative patients (P=0.09). This showed that patients with relatively higher residual displacement also had satisfactory functional outcomes. The functional outcomes were compared after dividing the residual displacement into 2 groups: <10 mm and >10 mm and no significant difference was found in outcomes for either operative or non-operative patients.

Conclusion: Up to 10 mm of residual displacement is acceptable in pelvic ring injuries. More prospective studies with a longer follow up are needed for determination of correlation between reduction and functional outcome.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
盆腔环残余移位是否影响盆腔环损伤的功能结局?
目的:残留移位对患者功能预后的影响尚不清楚,骨盆环残留移位的可接受标准仍有争议。本研究的目的是评估残留移位对骨盆环损伤功能结局的影响。材料与方法:对49例骨盆环损伤患者(包括手术和非手术)进行为期6个月的随访。入院时、手术后和6个月时测量前后位(AP)、垂直和旋转位移。结果位移(AP和垂直位移矢量相加)进行比较。根据Matta的标准,《位移》分为优秀、良好、一般和差。6个月时使用Majeed评分进行功能结局评估。非工作患者采用百分数法计算工作调整后的Majeed评分。结果:我们比较了残余位移与功能预后(优秀/良好/一般),发现手术组(P=0.33)与非手术组(P=0.09)之间无显著差异。这表明,相对较高残余位移的患者也具有令人满意的功能预后。将剩余移位分为10 mm两组,比较两组患者的功能结局,手术组与非手术组的结果无显著差异。结论:骨盆环损伤可接受10mm的残余位移。需要更多的前瞻性研究和更长时间的随访来确定复位和功能预后之间的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Concurrent avulsion of posterior cruciate ligament and semimembranosus: a case-based discussion and literature review. Autologous non-vascularized fibula with compression plating in the management of aseptic complex non-union of long bones. Combined awake videolaryngo-bronchoscopy intubation with HFNC preoxygenation for predicted difficult airway in a patient with post-burn mentosternal scar contracture. Comparative outcome of ultrasound guided vs. fluoroscopy guided hydrodilatation in adhesive capsulitis: a prospective study. Evaluation of pain associated with the application of burn dressings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1