'It has been the hardest decision of my life': a mixed-methods study of pregnant women's COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy.

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology & Health Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-22 DOI:10.1080/08870446.2023.2214569
Susanna Kola-Palmer, Alice Keely, Jane Walsh
{"title":"<i>'It has been the hardest decision of my</i> life': a mixed-methods study of pregnant women's COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy.","authors":"Susanna Kola-Palmer, Alice Keely, Jane Walsh","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2214569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore psychological factors influencing decision-making regarding COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional mixed-methods online survey comprising sociodemographic factors, health beliefs, trust and anticipated regret, and open-ended qualitative questions. Pregnant respondents living in the UK or Ireland (<i>n</i> = 191) completed the online survey during June and July 2021.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Intention to vaccinate against COVID-19 during pregnancy, with response options yes (vaccine accepting), no (vaccine resistant), unsure (vaccine hesitant). Qualitative questions about perceived benefits and risks of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate analysis of correlates of vaccine hesitancy and resistance revealed independent associations for perceived barriers to the COVID-19 vaccine, anticipated regret, and social influences. Most respondents described making a decision regarding COVID-19 vaccination in the absence of satisfactory information or guidance from a health care professional. Vaccine hesitant and resistant respondents reported significantly greater barriers to the COVID-19 vaccination than vaccine accepting respondents. Concerns about the vaccine focussed on the speed of its development and roll-out and lack of evidence regarding its safe use in pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants who did not intend to be vaccinated against COVID-19 in pregnancy focused on vaccine fears as opposed to virus fears. Results indicate that pregnant women need balanced vaccine information and unequivocal health care provider recommendation to aid maternal vaccination decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1706-1726"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2023.2214569","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore psychological factors influencing decision-making regarding COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women.

Design: Cross-sectional mixed-methods online survey comprising sociodemographic factors, health beliefs, trust and anticipated regret, and open-ended qualitative questions. Pregnant respondents living in the UK or Ireland (n = 191) completed the online survey during June and July 2021.

Main outcome measures: Intention to vaccinate against COVID-19 during pregnancy, with response options yes (vaccine accepting), no (vaccine resistant), unsure (vaccine hesitant). Qualitative questions about perceived benefits and risks of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy.

Results: Multivariate analysis of correlates of vaccine hesitancy and resistance revealed independent associations for perceived barriers to the COVID-19 vaccine, anticipated regret, and social influences. Most respondents described making a decision regarding COVID-19 vaccination in the absence of satisfactory information or guidance from a health care professional. Vaccine hesitant and resistant respondents reported significantly greater barriers to the COVID-19 vaccination than vaccine accepting respondents. Concerns about the vaccine focussed on the speed of its development and roll-out and lack of evidence regarding its safe use in pregnancy.

Conclusion: Participants who did not intend to be vaccinated against COVID-19 in pregnancy focused on vaccine fears as opposed to virus fears. Results indicate that pregnant women need balanced vaccine information and unequivocal health care provider recommendation to aid maternal vaccination decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这是我一生中最艰难的决定":关于孕妇对 COVID-19 疫苗接种犹豫不决的混合方法研究。
目的:探讨影响孕妇接种 COVID-19 疫苗决策的心理因素:探讨影响孕妇接种 COVID-19 疫苗决策的心理因素:横断面混合方法在线调查,包括社会人口因素、健康信念、信任和预期遗憾以及开放式定性问题。居住在英国或爱尔兰的孕妇受访者(n = 191)在 2021 年 6 月和 7 月期间完成了在线调查:怀孕期间接种 COVID-19 疫苗的意向,回答选项为是(接受疫苗)、否(抗拒疫苗)、不确定(犹豫疫苗)。关于孕期接种 COVID-19 疫苗的益处和风险的定性问题:对疫苗犹豫和抵触的相关因素进行的多变量分析表明,COVID-19 疫苗的认知障碍、预期遗憾和社会影响之间存在独立关联。大多数受访者表示,他们是在缺乏令人满意的信息或医护人员指导的情况下做出接种 COVID-19 疫苗的决定的。与接受 COVID-19 疫苗接种的受访者相比,对疫苗犹豫不决和抗拒接种的受访者所面临的障碍要大得多。对该疫苗的担忧主要集中在其研发和推广速度以及缺乏在孕期安全使用该疫苗的证据:结论:不打算在孕期接种 COVID-19 疫苗的受访者主要担心疫苗而不是病毒。结果表明,孕妇需要均衡的疫苗信息和明确的医疗保健提供者建议,以帮助孕产妇做出接种疫苗的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
期刊最新文献
Predicting adherence to COVID-19 behavioural guidelines: a comparison of Protection Motivation Theory and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. 'Welcome to my world': a thematic analysis of the lived experiences of people with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis during the UK COVID-19 lockdown. 'It has been the hardest decision of my life': a mixed-methods study of pregnant women's COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy. Psychosocial and health stressors during the COVID-19 pandemic and their association with sleep quality. Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with asthma: a co-produced mixed-methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1