Writing letters in two graphic systems: Behavioral and neural correlates in Latin-Arabic biscripters

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuropsychologia Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108567
Elie Fabiani , Jean-Luc Velay , Céleste Younes , Jean-Luc Anton , Bruno Nazarian , Julien Sein , Michel Habib , Jeremy Danna , Marieke Longcamp
{"title":"Writing letters in two graphic systems: Behavioral and neural correlates in Latin-Arabic biscripters","authors":"Elie Fabiani ,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Velay ,&nbsp;Céleste Younes ,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Anton ,&nbsp;Bruno Nazarian ,&nbsp;Julien Sein ,&nbsp;Michel Habib ,&nbsp;Jeremy Danna ,&nbsp;Marieke Longcamp","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Biscriptuality is the ability to read and write using two scripts. Despite the increasing number of biscripters, this phenomenon remains poorly understood. Here, we focused on investigating graphomotor processing in French–Arabic biscripters. We chose the French and Arabic alphabets because they have comparable visuospatial complexity and linguistic features, but differ dramatically in their graphomotor characteristics. In a first experiment we describe the graphomotor features of the two alphabets and showed that while Arabic and Latin letters are produced with the same velocity and fluency, Arabic letters require more pen lifts, contain more right-to-left strokes and clockwise curves, and take longer to write than Latin letters. These results suggest that Arabic and Latin letters are produced via different motor patterns. In a second experiment we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to ask whether writing the two scripts relies upon partially distinct or fully overlapping neural networks, and whether the elements of the previously described handwriting network are recruited to the same extent by the two scripts. We found that both scripts engaged the so-called “writing network”, but that within the network, Arabic letters recruited the left </span>superior parietal lobule<span> (SPL) and the left primary motor cortex (M1) more strongly than Latin letters. Both regions have previously been identified as holding scale-invariant representations of letter trajectories. Arabic and Latin letters also activated distinct regions that do not belong to the writing network. Complementary analyses indicate that the differences observed between scripts at the neural level could be driven by the specific graphomotor features of each script. Overall, our results indicate that particular features of the practiced scripts can lead to different motor organization at both the behavioral and brain levels in biscripters.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":19279,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychologia","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 108567"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002839322300101X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Biscriptuality is the ability to read and write using two scripts. Despite the increasing number of biscripters, this phenomenon remains poorly understood. Here, we focused on investigating graphomotor processing in French–Arabic biscripters. We chose the French and Arabic alphabets because they have comparable visuospatial complexity and linguistic features, but differ dramatically in their graphomotor characteristics. In a first experiment we describe the graphomotor features of the two alphabets and showed that while Arabic and Latin letters are produced with the same velocity and fluency, Arabic letters require more pen lifts, contain more right-to-left strokes and clockwise curves, and take longer to write than Latin letters. These results suggest that Arabic and Latin letters are produced via different motor patterns. In a second experiment we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to ask whether writing the two scripts relies upon partially distinct or fully overlapping neural networks, and whether the elements of the previously described handwriting network are recruited to the same extent by the two scripts. We found that both scripts engaged the so-called “writing network”, but that within the network, Arabic letters recruited the left superior parietal lobule (SPL) and the left primary motor cortex (M1) more strongly than Latin letters. Both regions have previously been identified as holding scale-invariant representations of letter trajectories. Arabic and Latin letters also activated distinct regions that do not belong to the writing network. Complementary analyses indicate that the differences observed between scripts at the neural level could be driven by the specific graphomotor features of each script. Overall, our results indicate that particular features of the practiced scripts can lead to different motor organization at both the behavioral and brain levels in biscripters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用两种图形系统书写字母:拉丁-阿拉伯双字母书写者的行为和神经相关性。
双脚本是指使用两个脚本进行读写的能力。尽管有越来越多的双性恋者,但对这一现象的了解仍然很少。在这里,我们重点研究了法阿双语书写者的字形运动处理。我们选择法语和阿拉伯语字母表是因为它们具有相似的视觉空间复杂性和语言特征,但在字形特征上有很大差异。在第一个实验中,我们描述了这两个字母的动笔特征,并表明虽然阿拉伯语和拉丁字母的产生速度和流畅性相同,但阿拉伯语字母需要更多的提笔,包含更多的从右到左笔画和顺时针曲线,并且比拉丁字母需要更长的书写时间。这些结果表明,阿拉伯语和拉丁字母是通过不同的运动模式产生的。在第二个实验中,我们使用功能磁共振成像来询问书写这两个脚本是否依赖于部分不同或完全重叠的神经网络,以及之前描述的手写网络的元素是否在相同程度上被两个脚本所吸收。我们发现,这两种文字都参与了所谓的“写作网络”,但在这个网络中,阿拉伯字母比拉丁字母更强烈地吸收了左顶叶上小叶(SPL)和左初级运动皮层(M1)。这两个区域先前都被识别为保持字母轨迹的比例不变表示。阿拉伯语和拉丁字母也激活了不属于书写网络的不同区域。补充分析表明,在神经水平上观察到的脚本之间的差异可能是由每个脚本的特定图形运动特征驱动的。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,练习脚本的特定特征可以导致双脚本作者在行为和大脑层面上的不同运动组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychologia is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to experimental and theoretical contributions that advance understanding of human cognition and behavior from a neuroscience perspective. The journal will consider for publication studies that link brain function with cognitive processes, including attention and awareness, action and motor control, executive functions and cognitive control, memory, language, and emotion and social cognition.
期刊最新文献
Primary manipulation knowledge of objects is associated with the functional coupling of pMTG and aIPS Temporal dynamics of implicit moral evaluation: From empathy for pain to mentalizing processes Neuroimaging and perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: A narrative review of research and future directions Working memory load increases movement-related alpha and beta desynchronization Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1