Commonalities between mind wandering and task-set switching: An event-related potential study

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuropsychologia Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108585
Yi-Sheng Wong , Narun Pat , Liana Machado
{"title":"Commonalities between mind wandering and task-set switching: An event-related potential study","authors":"Yi-Sheng Wong ,&nbsp;Narun Pat ,&nbsp;Liana Machado","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous research has established that mind wandering does not necessarily disrupt one's task-switching performance. Here we investigated the effects of mind wandering on electrophysiological signatures, measured using event-related potentials (ERPs), during a switching task. In the current study, a final sample of 22 young adults performed a task-switching paradigm while electroencephalography was continuously recorded; mind wandering was assessed via thought probes at the end of each block. Consistent with previous research, we found no significant disruptive effects of mind wandering on task-switching performance. The ERP results showed that at the posterior electrode sites (P3, Pz, and P4), P3 amplitude was higher for mind-wandering switch trials than on-task switch trials, thus opposing the typical pattern of P3 attenuation during periods of mind wandering relative to on-task episodes. Considering that increased P3 amplitude during higher-order switch trials (e.g., response rule switching) may reflect the implementation of new higher-order task sets/rules, the current findings seem to indicate similar executive control processes underlie mind wandering and task-set switching, providing further evidence in favor of a role for switching in mind wandering.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19279,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychologia","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 108585"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393223001197","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Previous research has established that mind wandering does not necessarily disrupt one's task-switching performance. Here we investigated the effects of mind wandering on electrophysiological signatures, measured using event-related potentials (ERPs), during a switching task. In the current study, a final sample of 22 young adults performed a task-switching paradigm while electroencephalography was continuously recorded; mind wandering was assessed via thought probes at the end of each block. Consistent with previous research, we found no significant disruptive effects of mind wandering on task-switching performance. The ERP results showed that at the posterior electrode sites (P3, Pz, and P4), P3 amplitude was higher for mind-wandering switch trials than on-task switch trials, thus opposing the typical pattern of P3 attenuation during periods of mind wandering relative to on-task episodes. Considering that increased P3 amplitude during higher-order switch trials (e.g., response rule switching) may reflect the implementation of new higher-order task sets/rules, the current findings seem to indicate similar executive control processes underlie mind wandering and task-set switching, providing further evidence in favor of a role for switching in mind wandering.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走神和任务集转换的共性:一项与事件相关的潜在研究
先前的研究已经证实,走神并不一定会影响一个人的任务转换表现。在这里,我们研究了在切换任务中,使用事件相关电位(ERPs)测量的走神对电生理特征的影响。在目前的研究中,22名年轻人的最终样本在连续记录脑电图的同时进行了任务转换范式;通过在每个区块末尾的思维探针来评估走神。与之前的研究一致,我们没有发现走神对任务切换性能的显著破坏性影响。ERP结果显示,在后电极部位(P3、Pz和P4),走神切换试验的P3振幅高于任务切换试验,因此与走神期间相对于任务发作的P3衰减的典型模式相反。考虑到在高阶切换试验(例如,响应规则切换)过程中P3幅度的增加可能反映了新的高阶任务集/规则的实施,目前的研究结果似乎表明,类似的执行控制过程是精神游荡和任务集切换的基础,为支持切换在精神游荡中的作用提供了进一步的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychologia is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to experimental and theoretical contributions that advance understanding of human cognition and behavior from a neuroscience perspective. The journal will consider for publication studies that link brain function with cognitive processes, including attention and awareness, action and motor control, executive functions and cognitive control, memory, language, and emotion and social cognition.
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal Correlates of Emotional Conflict Processing in Typically Developing Adolescents using Magnetoencephalography. Primary manipulation knowledge of objects is associated with the functional coupling of pMTG and aIPS Temporal dynamics of implicit moral evaluation: From empathy for pain to mentalizing processes Neuroimaging and perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: A narrative review of research and future directions Working memory load increases movement-related alpha and beta desynchronization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1