Effectiveness of handover practices between emergency department and intensive care unit nurses

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE African Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.afjem.2023.03.001
Tebogo T. Mamalelala , Shelley Schmollgruber , Meghan Botes , William Holzemer
{"title":"Effectiveness of handover practices between emergency department and intensive care unit nurses","authors":"Tebogo T. Mamalelala ,&nbsp;Shelley Schmollgruber ,&nbsp;Meghan Botes ,&nbsp;William Holzemer","doi":"10.1016/j.afjem.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nurses from the emergency department (ED) and the intensive care unit (ICU) must interact during the handover procedure. Factors such as unit boundaries, the interaction between different specialities, patient acuities, and treatment adjustments generate specific negotiating and teamwork problems during the transition of patients from ED to ICU.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to describe the opinions of nurses regarding the effectiveness of handover practices between nurses in the ED and ICU in a major academic hospital in Gauteng province, South Africa.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>An analytical cross-sectional survey design was used. Data were collected using a 16-item handover evaluation tool. It comprises two sections (1) biographical details and (2) 16 statements about handover quality divided into five constructs, namely information transfer, shared understanding, working atmosphere, overall handover quality, and circumstances of handover. Data analysis was done utilising descriptive and non-parametric statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The majority (51.8%; n = 115) of the handovers occurred during the day. Out of 171 nurses, there were specialist practice emergency (19.2%; n = 33) and intensive care (28.0%; n = 48) nurses. There was statistical significance in information transfer between the ED and ICU nurses. (Me = 4.0, p &lt; 0.05), compared to ICU nurses (Me = 3.0). Nurse specialist and non-specialist nurses' handovers differed statistically significantly on 12 of the 16 items on the rating scale, compared to 10 for non-specialist nurses' handovers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study showed that ED and ICU nurses have significantly different requirements and expectations for handover procedures. In addition to completed documentation, subtle interpretations of the information provided and received also impact the need. The ED and ICU nurses would need to agree on the contents of a structured handover framework because different specialities and departments have varied expectations to achieve an effective handover.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48515,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X23000101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nurses from the emergency department (ED) and the intensive care unit (ICU) must interact during the handover procedure. Factors such as unit boundaries, the interaction between different specialities, patient acuities, and treatment adjustments generate specific negotiating and teamwork problems during the transition of patients from ED to ICU.

Objective

This study aimed to describe the opinions of nurses regarding the effectiveness of handover practices between nurses in the ED and ICU in a major academic hospital in Gauteng province, South Africa.

Method

An analytical cross-sectional survey design was used. Data were collected using a 16-item handover evaluation tool. It comprises two sections (1) biographical details and (2) 16 statements about handover quality divided into five constructs, namely information transfer, shared understanding, working atmosphere, overall handover quality, and circumstances of handover. Data analysis was done utilising descriptive and non-parametric statistics.

Results

The majority (51.8%; n = 115) of the handovers occurred during the day. Out of 171 nurses, there were specialist practice emergency (19.2%; n = 33) and intensive care (28.0%; n = 48) nurses. There was statistical significance in information transfer between the ED and ICU nurses. (Me = 4.0, p < 0.05), compared to ICU nurses (Me = 3.0). Nurse specialist and non-specialist nurses' handovers differed statistically significantly on 12 of the 16 items on the rating scale, compared to 10 for non-specialist nurses' handovers.

Conclusion

The study showed that ED and ICU nurses have significantly different requirements and expectations for handover procedures. In addition to completed documentation, subtle interpretations of the information provided and received also impact the need. The ED and ICU nurses would need to agree on the contents of a structured handover framework because different specialities and departments have varied expectations to achieve an effective handover.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科和重症监护室护士交接的有效性
背景急诊科(ED)和重症监护室(ICU)的护士在交接过程中必须互动。诸如单位边界、不同专业之间的互动、患者敏锐性、,在患者从急诊室过渡到重症监护室的过程中,治疗调整会产生特定的谈判和团队合作问题。目的本研究旨在描述护士对南非豪登省一家大型学术医院急诊室和重症监护室护士之间交接做法的有效性的看法。方法采用分析性横断面调查设计。使用16项移交评估工具收集数据。它包括两个部分(1)传记细节和(2)关于移交质量的16个陈述,分为五个结构,即信息传递、共享理解、工作氛围、总体移交质量和移交情况。数据分析采用描述性和非参数统计方法。结果大多数(51.8%;n=115)移交发生在白天。在171名护士中,有专科急诊(19.2%;n=33)和重症监护(28.0%;n=48)护士。急诊科和ICU护士之间的信息传递具有统计学意义。(Me=4.0,p<;0.05),而ICU护士(Me=3.0)。在评定量表的16个项目中,护士-专科护士和非专科护士的交接在12个项目上存在统计学显著差异,而非专科护士交接的项目为10个。结论急诊科和ICU护士对交接程序的要求和期望存在显著差异。除了完整的文件外,对所提供和收到的信息的微妙解释也会影响需求。急诊科和重症监护室护士需要就结构化移交框架的内容达成一致,因为不同的专业和部门对实现有效移交有不同的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
85 days
期刊最新文献
From vocational to graduation: A mixed methods study of support needs for vocational learners pursuing post-graduate education in South Africa Improving pain management for trauma patients at two Rwandan emergency departments Descriptive analysis of road traffic crashes encountered by Tanzanian motorcycle taxi drivers trained in first aid Workplace violence in three public sector emergency departments, Gauteng, South Africa: A cross-sectional survey Healthcare professionals perceptions towards the determinants of effective emergency health care services in public health centres of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1