The effect of COVID-19 on the in-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A large scale meta-analysis

Amr Ehab El-Qushayri , Abdullah Dahy , Amira Yasmine Benmelouka , Ahmed Mostafa Ahmed Kamel
{"title":"The effect of COVID-19 on the in-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A large scale meta-analysis","authors":"Amr Ehab El-Qushayri ,&nbsp;Abdullah Dahy ,&nbsp;Amira Yasmine Benmelouka ,&nbsp;Ahmed Mostafa Ahmed Kamel","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>We aimed to study the effect of COVID-19 on the in-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A systematic literature search was performed in 2nd February 2022 updated in 12th December 2022 for recruiting relevant papers. The effect size was computed via the odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous data or standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous data along with the 95% confidence interval (95%CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After the screening of 1075 records, we found 11 relevant papers that included 2018 COVID-19 patients and negative controls 21,207. ACS patients with COVID-19 had a significant higher mortality rate (OR: 4.95; 95%CI: 3.92–6.36; <em>p</em> &lt;0.01), long hospital stay (days) (SMD: 1.17; 95%CI: 0.92–1.42; <em>p</em> &lt;0.01), and reduced post TIMI 3 score (OR: 0.55; 95%CI: 0.41–0.73; <em>p</em> &lt;0.01) rather than controls. However, we found no significant differences in terms of thrombus aspiration prevalence (OR: 1.88; 95%CI: 0.97–3.65; <em>p</em> = 0.06) or door to balloon time (SMD: 0.11; 95%CI: -0.43–0.66; <em>p</em> = 0.7).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite that we found a significant association between COVID-19 and high mortality, more length of hospital stay and reduced post TIMI 3 score, in ACS patients after PCI, a rigorous analysis of the adjusted hazard ratio –that was absent in most of the included studies- by further meta-analysis is recommended to confirm this association. However, close monitoring of COVID-19 in patients with a high risk of developing ACS, is recommended due to the associated hypercoagulability of COVID-19 infection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9847364/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medicine open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266703642300002X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim

We aimed to study the effect of COVID-19 on the in-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Method

A systematic literature search was performed in 2nd February 2022 updated in 12th December 2022 for recruiting relevant papers. The effect size was computed via the odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous data or standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous data along with the 95% confidence interval (95%CI).

Results

After the screening of 1075 records, we found 11 relevant papers that included 2018 COVID-19 patients and negative controls 21,207. ACS patients with COVID-19 had a significant higher mortality rate (OR: 4.95; 95%CI: 3.92–6.36; p <0.01), long hospital stay (days) (SMD: 1.17; 95%CI: 0.92–1.42; p <0.01), and reduced post TIMI 3 score (OR: 0.55; 95%CI: 0.41–0.73; p <0.01) rather than controls. However, we found no significant differences in terms of thrombus aspiration prevalence (OR: 1.88; 95%CI: 0.97–3.65; p = 0.06) or door to balloon time (SMD: 0.11; 95%CI: -0.43–0.66; p = 0.7).

Conclusion

Despite that we found a significant association between COVID-19 and high mortality, more length of hospital stay and reduced post TIMI 3 score, in ACS patients after PCI, a rigorous analysis of the adjusted hazard ratio –that was absent in most of the included studies- by further meta-analysis is recommended to confirm this association. However, close monitoring of COVID-19 in patients with a high risk of developing ACS, is recommended due to the associated hypercoagulability of COVID-19 infection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19对急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗院内结局的影响:一项大规模meta分析
目的研究新冠肺炎对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)住院结果的影响。方法于2022年2月2日进行系统文献检索,于2022年12月12日更新,以招募相关论文。通过二分法数据的比值比(OR)或连续数据的标准化平均差(SMD)以及95%置信区间(95%CI)计算效应大小。与对照组相比,患有新冠肺炎的ACS患者具有显著更高的死亡率(OR:4.95;95%CI:3.92–6.36;p<;0.01)、长期住院(天数)(SMD:1.17;95%CI:0.92–1.42;p&llt;0.01)和降低的TIMI 3后评分(OR:0.55;95%CI=0.41–0.73;p&lgt;0.01)。然而,我们发现血栓抽吸发生率(OR:1.88;95%CI:0.97–3.65;p=0.06)或门到球囊时间(SMD:0.11;95%CI:-0.43–0.66;p=0.7)没有显著差异,建议通过进一步的荟萃分析对调整后的风险比进行严格分析,以证实这种相关性。然而,由于新冠肺炎感染的相关高凝状态,建议密切监测ACS高风险患者的COVID-19]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of medicine open
American journal of medicine open Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊最新文献
Functional Assessment of >18 Years Old Patients at Internal Medicine Ward—Relationship with In-Hospital and 30-Day Mortality Current Communication Practices Between Internal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants and Program Directors: A National Survey Post-Acute Sequelae of Covid-19: A System-wise Approach on the Effects of Long-Covid-19 In-Hospital Mortality by Race and Ethnicity Among Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Using Data From the US National COVID Cohort Collaborative Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome Among Emerging Adult Cannabis Users by Race/Ethnicity: Analysis of the 2009-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1