'You Treated Me Like an Object, I Don't Forgive You!': The Effect of Dehu- manization on Interpersonal Forgiveness from the Victim's Perspective.

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Psychological Research Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.21500/20112084.5695
Gennaro Pica, Emanuele Fino
{"title":"'You Treated Me Like an Object, I Don't Forgive You!': The Effect of Dehu- manization on Interpersonal Forgiveness from the Victim's Perspective.","authors":"Gennaro Pica,&nbsp;Emanuele Fino","doi":"10.21500/20112084.5695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a gap in the literature on the impact of the perceptions of a victim of an offense upon their forgiveness towards the offender, particularly when those perceptions include dehumanization.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present cross-sectional exploratory study aimed at examining whether the perceptions of being treated in a dehumanized fashion influences interpersonal forgiveness, avoidance, and revenge intentions of dehumanized victims towards the offender.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We recruited 149 individuals from the general population, who took part in an online task, consisting of remembering an offense they had been victim of and of a set of self-reported measures of dehumanization (<i>uniqueness</i> and <i>nature</i>), interpersonal forgiveness, avoidance, and revenge intentions. We used multiple linear regression to test the study's hypotheses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The perceived denial of the victims' human uniqueness was not associated with the dependent variables, whereas the perceived denial of the victims' human nature was significantly and negatively associated with interpersonal forgiveness and positively with avoidance and revenge intentions, after controlling for the effects of a set of known covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results revealed a role for dehumanization (<i>nature</i>) in predicting the victims' interpersonal forgiveness, avoidance, and revenge intentions. Implications for further research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46542,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychological Research","volume":"15 2","pages":"77-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6f/84/2011-2084-ijpr-15-02-77.PMC10233960.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5695","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is a gap in the literature on the impact of the perceptions of a victim of an offense upon their forgiveness towards the offender, particularly when those perceptions include dehumanization.

Objectives: The present cross-sectional exploratory study aimed at examining whether the perceptions of being treated in a dehumanized fashion influences interpersonal forgiveness, avoidance, and revenge intentions of dehumanized victims towards the offender.

Method: We recruited 149 individuals from the general population, who took part in an online task, consisting of remembering an offense they had been victim of and of a set of self-reported measures of dehumanization (uniqueness and nature), interpersonal forgiveness, avoidance, and revenge intentions. We used multiple linear regression to test the study's hypotheses.

Results: The perceived denial of the victims' human uniqueness was not associated with the dependent variables, whereas the perceived denial of the victims' human nature was significantly and negatively associated with interpersonal forgiveness and positively with avoidance and revenge intentions, after controlling for the effects of a set of known covariates.

Conclusions: The results revealed a role for dehumanization (nature) in predicting the victims' interpersonal forgiveness, avoidance, and revenge intentions. Implications for further research are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“你把我当作一件物品,我不会原谅你的!”:受害者视角下的德虎化对人际宽恕的影响。
引言:关于犯罪受害者的观念对他们对犯罪者的宽恕的影响,特别是当这些观念包括非人化时,文献中存在空白。目的:本横断面探索性研究旨在探讨被非人性化对待的感知是否会影响非人性化受害者对加害人的人际宽恕、回避和报复意图。方法:我们从普通人群中招募了149个人,他们参加了一项在线任务,包括回忆他们曾经遭受过的一次冒犯,以及一系列自我报告的非人性化(独特性和本性)、人际宽恕、回避和报复意图。我们使用多元线性回归来检验研究的假设。结果:在控制了一组已知协变量的影响后,感知到的受害者人性否认与人际宽恕呈显著负相关,与逃避和报复意图呈显著正相关。结论:结果揭示了非人性化(本性)在预测受害者的人际宽恕、回避和报复意图方面的作用。讨论了进一步研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychological Research
International Journal of Psychological Research PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychological Research (Int.j.psychol.res) is the Faculty of Psychology’s official publication of San Buenaventura University in Medellin, Colombia. Int.j.psychol.res relies on a vast and diverse theoretical and thematic publishing material, which includes unpublished productions of diverse psychological issues and behavioral human areas such as psychiatry, neurosciences, mental health, among others.
期刊最新文献
Voluntary Ethanol Intake and Anxiety Behavior in Wistar-Uis Rats. Gaslighting Exposure During Emerging Adulthood: Personality Traits and Vulnerability Paths. Validity and Internal Consistency of a Spanish Version of the Cognitive Flexibil ity Scale (CFS). Attitudes of the Host Population towards Syrian Refugees: A New Theoretical Perspective Translation of Well-being Assessment Instruments in African Contexts: A Mapping Review and Future Directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1