Attachment Style and Empathy in Late children, Adolescents, and Adults: Meta-analytic Review.

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Psychological Research Pub Date : 2023-03-05 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.21500/20112084.5409
Florencia de Sanctis, Belén Mesurado
{"title":"Attachment Style and Empathy in Late children, Adolescents, and Adults: Meta-analytic Review.","authors":"Florencia de Sanctis, Belén Mesurado","doi":"10.21500/20112084.5409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attachment has a fundamental role in the development of empathy, which helps people interact with others and prevents aggressive behaviors. It is believed that having a secure attachment can promote empathy. However, there is no clear evidence about the relationship between insecure attachment styles and empathy. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to clarify the relation between different types of attachment and empathy from late children to adults (9-47 years). It was conducted using 14 studies (11542 participants) for the secure attachment, 7 studies (3115 participants) for the avoidant, and 8 studies (3479 participants) for the anxious-ambivalent. Results indicated that secure attachment was positively correlated with empathy, avoidant attachment was negatively correlated, and anxious-ambivalent attachment had an inconclusive relationship. Whereas the results obtained for the secure and avoidant attachment with empathy are consistent with literature, the inconsistencies in anxious-ambivalent style may be due to a duality of feelings experienced by these individuals, who go from high levels of empathy (to be accepted) to low levels of empathy (to avoid distressing emotions). We suggest broadening the limit in age, include the multidirectional nature of empathy, as well as the effect of gender and different sorts of affiliations (parents, couples) for future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46542,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychological Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5d/3c/2011-2084-ijpr-15-02-114.PMC10233954.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attachment has a fundamental role in the development of empathy, which helps people interact with others and prevents aggressive behaviors. It is believed that having a secure attachment can promote empathy. However, there is no clear evidence about the relationship between insecure attachment styles and empathy. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to clarify the relation between different types of attachment and empathy from late children to adults (9-47 years). It was conducted using 14 studies (11542 participants) for the secure attachment, 7 studies (3115 participants) for the avoidant, and 8 studies (3479 participants) for the anxious-ambivalent. Results indicated that secure attachment was positively correlated with empathy, avoidant attachment was negatively correlated, and anxious-ambivalent attachment had an inconclusive relationship. Whereas the results obtained for the secure and avoidant attachment with empathy are consistent with literature, the inconsistencies in anxious-ambivalent style may be due to a duality of feelings experienced by these individuals, who go from high levels of empathy (to be accepted) to low levels of empathy (to avoid distressing emotions). We suggest broadening the limit in age, include the multidirectional nature of empathy, as well as the effect of gender and different sorts of affiliations (parents, couples) for future studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期儿童、青少年和成年人的依恋风格与移情:元分析综述
依恋对移情能力的发展起着根本性的作用,而移情能力有助于人与人之间的互动,并能防止攻击性行为。人们认为,安全的依恋可以促进移情。然而,关于不安全依恋风格与移情之间的关系却没有明确的证据。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以澄清从晚期儿童到成人(9-47 岁)不同类型的依恋与移情之间的关系。荟萃分析使用了14项研究(11542名参与者)来分析安全型依恋,7项研究(3115名参与者)来分析回避型依恋,8项研究(3479名参与者)来分析焦虑-矛盾型依恋。结果表明,安全型依恋与移情呈正相关,回避型依恋与移情呈负相关,而焦虑矛盾型依恋与移情的关系不确定。安全型依恋和回避型依恋与移情的结果与文献一致,而焦虑-矛盾型依恋的不一致可能是由于这些人经历了双重情感,他们从高水平的移情(被接纳)到低水平的移情(避免痛苦情感)。我们建议在今后的研究中扩大年龄限制,纳入移情的多向性,以及性别和不同关系(父母、夫妻)的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychological Research
International Journal of Psychological Research PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychological Research (Int.j.psychol.res) is the Faculty of Psychology’s official publication of San Buenaventura University in Medellin, Colombia. Int.j.psychol.res relies on a vast and diverse theoretical and thematic publishing material, which includes unpublished productions of diverse psychological issues and behavioral human areas such as psychiatry, neurosciences, mental health, among others.
期刊最新文献
Functional Connectivity of Moral Cognition and Traits of Psychopathy in Youth: An Analysis of the Scientific Literature Behavioral Changes after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale Intimate partner violence attitudes: Who tolerates the most? Violencia en el noviazgo en estudiantes universitarios: validación de la escala DVQ-VP en Bolivia Brief Version of the Revised-Abbreviated Eysenck Personality Questionnaire in a Spanish Young Adult Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1