G A Raskin, M S Mukhina, E D Kravtsova, I V Tsimafeyeu, S A Tyulandin, N P Belyak, M A Kleshchev, R V Orlova
{"title":"[Study of FGFR2 status in gastric cancer by immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization].","authors":"G A Raskin, M S Mukhina, E D Kravtsova, I V Tsimafeyeu, S A Tyulandin, N P Belyak, M A Kleshchev, R V Orlova","doi":"10.17116/patol20238503140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of FGFR2 status in gastric cancer is an important task, without clarification of which it is impossible to identify a cohort of patients in whom the best response to treatment with anti-FGFR2 drugs could be obtained.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a comparative analysis of the expression and amplification of the <i>FGFR2</i> gene in gastric cancer in primary tumors and metastases in the lymph nodes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>FGFR2 status was studied in 61 patients with stage III gastric adenocarcinoma using an immunohistochemical method (Abcam clone EPR24075-418, R&D clone 98706, Santa Cruz clone C-8, Abcam clone 1G3) and FISH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The antibody Abcam clone EPR24075-418 was found satisfactory for the immunohistochemical study of FGFR2. FGFR2 expression was detected in 26 (43%) cases, amplification in 5 (8%) cases. Amplification of <i>FGFR2</i> in 4 cases out of 5 was accompanied by the expression of 3+, in 1 case - 2+. Discordance between FGFR2 expression in primary tumor and lymph node metastases was revealed in 13 (21%) cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clone EPR24075-418 showed the best result in assessing the expression of FGFR2: the correlation with FISH results in reaction 3+ was 100%. Due to the high heterogeneity of FGFR2 expression, it is recommended to either examine the material of the primary tumor and metastasis, or evaluate a large volume of the primary tumor.</p>","PeriodicalId":8548,"journal":{"name":"Arkhiv patologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arkhiv patologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/patol20238503140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Assessment of FGFR2 status in gastric cancer is an important task, without clarification of which it is impossible to identify a cohort of patients in whom the best response to treatment with anti-FGFR2 drugs could be obtained.
Objective: To conduct a comparative analysis of the expression and amplification of the FGFR2 gene in gastric cancer in primary tumors and metastases in the lymph nodes.
Material and methods: FGFR2 status was studied in 61 patients with stage III gastric adenocarcinoma using an immunohistochemical method (Abcam clone EPR24075-418, R&D clone 98706, Santa Cruz clone C-8, Abcam clone 1G3) and FISH.
Results: The antibody Abcam clone EPR24075-418 was found satisfactory for the immunohistochemical study of FGFR2. FGFR2 expression was detected in 26 (43%) cases, amplification in 5 (8%) cases. Amplification of FGFR2 in 4 cases out of 5 was accompanied by the expression of 3+, in 1 case - 2+. Discordance between FGFR2 expression in primary tumor and lymph node metastases was revealed in 13 (21%) cases.
Conclusion: Clone EPR24075-418 showed the best result in assessing the expression of FGFR2: the correlation with FISH results in reaction 3+ was 100%. Due to the high heterogeneity of FGFR2 expression, it is recommended to either examine the material of the primary tumor and metastasis, or evaluate a large volume of the primary tumor.
期刊介绍:
The journal deals with original investigations on pressing problems of general pathology and pathologic anatomy, newest research methods, major issues of the theory and practice as well as problems of experimental, comparative and geographic pathology. To inform readers latest achievements of Russian and foreign medicine the journal regularly publishes editorial and survey articles, reviews of the most interesting Russian and foreign books on pathologic anatomy, new data on modern methods of investigation (histochemistry, electron microscopy, autoradiography, etc.), about problems of teaching, articles on the history of pathological anatomy development both in Russia and abroad.