Heavier Load Alters Upper Limb Muscle Synergy with Correlated fNIRS Responses in BA4 and BA6.

IF 10.5 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.34133/cbsystems.0033
Zhi Chen, Jin Yan, Xiaohui Song, Yongjun Qiao, Yong Joo Loh, Qing Xie, Chuanxin M Niu
{"title":"Heavier Load Alters Upper Limb Muscle Synergy with Correlated fNIRS Responses in BA4 and BA6.","authors":"Zhi Chen,&nbsp;Jin Yan,&nbsp;Xiaohui Song,&nbsp;Yongjun Qiao,&nbsp;Yong Joo Loh,&nbsp;Qing Xie,&nbsp;Chuanxin M Niu","doi":"10.34133/cbsystems.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In neurorehabilitation, motor performances may improve if patients could accomplish the training by overcoming mechanical loads. When the load inertia is increased, it has been found to trigger linear responses in motor-related cortices. The cortical responses, however, are unclear whether they also correlate to changes in muscular patterns. Therefore, it remains difficult to justify the magnitude of load during rehabilitation because of the gap between cortical and muscular activation. Here, we test the hypothesis that increases in load inertia may alter the muscle synergies, and the change in synergy may correlate with cortical activation. Twelve healthy subjects participated in the study. Each subject lifted dumbbells (either 0, 3, or 15 pounds) from the resting position to the armpit repetitively at 1 Hz. Surface electromyographic signals were collected from 8 muscles around the shoulder and the elbow, and hemodynamic signals were collected using functional near-infrared spectroscopy from motor-related regions Brodmann Area 4 (BA4) and BA6. Results showed that, given higher inertia, the synergy vectors differed farther from the baseline. Moreover, synergy similarity on the vector decreased linearly with cortical responses in BA4 and BA6, which associated with increases in inertia. Despite studies in literature that movements with similar kinematics tend not to differ in synergy vectors, we show a different possibility that the synergy vectors may deviate from a baseline. At least 2 consequences of adding inertia have been identified: to decrease synergy similarity and to increase motor cortical activity. The dual effects potentially provide a new benchmark for therapeutic goal setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":72764,"journal":{"name":"Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"4 ","pages":"0033"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233656/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/cbsystems.0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In neurorehabilitation, motor performances may improve if patients could accomplish the training by overcoming mechanical loads. When the load inertia is increased, it has been found to trigger linear responses in motor-related cortices. The cortical responses, however, are unclear whether they also correlate to changes in muscular patterns. Therefore, it remains difficult to justify the magnitude of load during rehabilitation because of the gap between cortical and muscular activation. Here, we test the hypothesis that increases in load inertia may alter the muscle synergies, and the change in synergy may correlate with cortical activation. Twelve healthy subjects participated in the study. Each subject lifted dumbbells (either 0, 3, or 15 pounds) from the resting position to the armpit repetitively at 1 Hz. Surface electromyographic signals were collected from 8 muscles around the shoulder and the elbow, and hemodynamic signals were collected using functional near-infrared spectroscopy from motor-related regions Brodmann Area 4 (BA4) and BA6. Results showed that, given higher inertia, the synergy vectors differed farther from the baseline. Moreover, synergy similarity on the vector decreased linearly with cortical responses in BA4 and BA6, which associated with increases in inertia. Despite studies in literature that movements with similar kinematics tend not to differ in synergy vectors, we show a different possibility that the synergy vectors may deviate from a baseline. At least 2 consequences of adding inertia have been identified: to decrease synergy similarity and to increase motor cortical activity. The dual effects potentially provide a new benchmark for therapeutic goal setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
较重负荷改变上肢肌肉协同作用与BA4和BA6相关的fNIRS反应。
在神经康复中,如果患者能够克服机械负荷完成训练,运动表现可能会得到改善。当负载惯性增加时,已经发现它会触发运动相关皮层的线性响应。然而,大脑皮层的反应是否也与肌肉模式的变化有关还不清楚。因此,由于皮质和肌肉激活之间的差距,很难证明康复期间负荷的大小。在这里,我们验证了载荷惯性增加可能改变肌肉协同作用的假设,协同作用的变化可能与皮层激活有关。12名健康受试者参加了这项研究。每个受试者以1hz的频率将哑铃(0、3或15磅)从静止位置举到腋下。收集肩部和肘部周围8块肌肉的表面肌电图信号,并使用功能近红外光谱收集运动相关区域Brodmann Area 4 (BA4)和BA6的血流动力学信号。结果表明,在惯性较高的情况下,协同矢量与基线的差异越大。此外,在BA4和BA6的皮层反应中,载体上的协同相似性呈线性下降,这与惯性的增加有关。尽管文献研究表明,具有相似运动学的运动在协同向量上往往没有差异,但我们显示了协同向量可能偏离基线的不同可能性。至少有两个结果增加惯性已被确定:减少协同相似性和增加运动皮质活动。双重效应可能为治疗目标的设定提供新的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Multi-Section Magnetic Soft Robot with Multirobot Navigation System for Vasculature Intervention. Advances in Biointegrated Wearable and Implantable Optoelectronic Devices for Cardiac Healthcare. Sensors and Devices Guided by Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Pain Medicine. Modeling Grid Cell Distortions with a Grid Cell Calibration Mechanism. Federated Abnormal Heart Sound Detection with Weak to No Labels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1