Impact of bariatric and metabolic surgery education program on the knowledge and attitude of medical students.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY Turkish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.5639
Halil Özgüç, Mustafa Narmanlı, Özgen Işık
{"title":"Impact of bariatric and metabolic surgery education program on the knowledge and attitude of medical students.","authors":"Halil Özgüç,&nbsp;Mustafa Narmanlı,&nbsp;Özgen Işık","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.5639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) is the most effective treatment method of morbid obesity. Optimum education of medical students regarding BMS is important for proper assessment of morbidly obese patients in the future.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Medical students from five and six years were determined as the targeted study population. A survey including 17 questions was applied through a web-based survey platform. Students who replied the survey were classified into two groups: distinct bariatric and metabolic surgery education program (BMSEP) (+) and (-). The answers of two groups were compared using Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 845 students replied the survey. Surgery referral rates were higher (33.4% vs. 26.5%, p <0.05), referring to alternative treatment methods were low (4.9% vs. 11.9%, p <0.05), the answer rate of \"absolutely agree\" was higher and \"have no idea\" was lower in questions regarding the indications of BMS for the sample patient with body mass index (BMI)> 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and the sample patient with BMI between 35-40 kg/m<sup>2</sup> in the BMSEP (+) group (p <0.05). However, the two groups were comparable for the answers given for the sample patient of BMI 30-35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> with uncontrolled diabetes. The rate of first-degree relative referral to BMS when indicated was higher in the BMSEP (+) group. Effectiveness of surgery, cost and risk perception were comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that medical students who have a distinct BMSEP in their medical school have better level of knowledge and comparable risk perception regarding BMS. Structured education programs in BMS may directly improve knowledge, perception, and attitude of medical students and indirectly increase the role of primary care physicians in patient referral to BMS and long-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234718/pdf/TJS-39-063.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.5639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) is the most effective treatment method of morbid obesity. Optimum education of medical students regarding BMS is important for proper assessment of morbidly obese patients in the future.

Material and methods: Medical students from five and six years were determined as the targeted study population. A survey including 17 questions was applied through a web-based survey platform. Students who replied the survey were classified into two groups: distinct bariatric and metabolic surgery education program (BMSEP) (+) and (-). The answers of two groups were compared using Chi-square test.

Results: In total, 845 students replied the survey. Surgery referral rates were higher (33.4% vs. 26.5%, p <0.05), referring to alternative treatment methods were low (4.9% vs. 11.9%, p <0.05), the answer rate of "absolutely agree" was higher and "have no idea" was lower in questions regarding the indications of BMS for the sample patient with body mass index (BMI)> 40 kg/m2 and the sample patient with BMI between 35-40 kg/m2 in the BMSEP (+) group (p <0.05). However, the two groups were comparable for the answers given for the sample patient of BMI 30-35 kg/m2 with uncontrolled diabetes. The rate of first-degree relative referral to BMS when indicated was higher in the BMSEP (+) group. Effectiveness of surgery, cost and risk perception were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion: This study showed that medical students who have a distinct BMSEP in their medical school have better level of knowledge and comparable risk perception regarding BMS. Structured education programs in BMS may directly improve knowledge, perception, and attitude of medical students and indirectly increase the role of primary care physicians in patient referral to BMS and long-term follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减肥与代谢外科教育方案对医学生知识和态度的影响。
目的:减肥与代谢手术(BMS)是治疗病态肥胖最有效的方法。对医学生进行最佳的BMS教育对于今后对病态肥胖患者的正确评估具有重要意义。材料和方法:确定五年级和六年级的医学生作为目标研究人群。通过网络调查平台进行了一项包括17个问题的调查。回答调查的学生被分为两组:不同的减肥和代谢手术教育计划(BMSEP)(+)和(-)。两组的答案比较采用卡方检验。结果:共有845名学生回复了调查。BMSEP(+)组的手术转诊率更高(33.4% vs. 26.5%, p 40 kg/m2), BMI在35-40 kg/m2之间的患者(p 2未控制的糖尿病患者)。BMSEP(+)组的一级相对转诊率较高。两组之间的手术效果、费用和风险感知具有可比性。结论:本研究表明,医学院BMSEP等级较高的医学生对BMS的认知水平和风险认知水平较高。BMS的结构化教育计划可以直接提高医学生的知识、认知和态度,并间接提高初级保健医生在患者转介到BMS和长期随访中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
FROM THE EDITOR'S DESK. Musinous cystic neoplasia mimicking hydatid cyst in the liver: Two rare cases Comments on ‘Percutaneous gas decompression can ease endoscopic derotation in sigmoid volvulus’ Pathological complete response and associated factors in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A retrospective study Effect of silver colloid dressing over conventional dressings in diabetic foot ulcer: A prospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1