Situating reproductive coercion in the sociocultural context: An ecological model to inform research, practice, and policy in the United States.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Trauma & Dissociation Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1080/15299732.2023.2212403
Jessica N Coleman, Samantha N Hellberg, Tiffany A Hopkins, Katherine A Thompson, Amanda B Bruening, Amanda C Jones
{"title":"Situating reproductive coercion in the sociocultural context: An ecological model to inform research, practice, and policy in the United States.","authors":"Jessica N Coleman,&nbsp;Samantha N Hellberg,&nbsp;Tiffany A Hopkins,&nbsp;Katherine A Thompson,&nbsp;Amanda B Bruening,&nbsp;Amanda C Jones","doi":"10.1080/15299732.2023.2212403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reproductive coercion (RC) can be conceptualized as any behavior that limits one's ability to make decisions about their reproductive health. Here, we broaden this definition to consider the impact of systemic and sociocultural factors on RC using an ecological model. Specifically, we use Bronfenbrenner's model as a framework for organizing the multilevel factors that influence reproductive coercion (RC) and its impacts on individual health. This paper is intended to offer a primer to historical, sociocultural, community, interpersonal, and individual processes that may interact to shape reproductive decision-making and its effect on individual health outcomes. We emphasize the importance of conceptualizing RC within the broader sociocultural and community context, and the potential implications for reproductive and sexual health research, clinical care, and policy in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":47476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2023.2212403","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reproductive coercion (RC) can be conceptualized as any behavior that limits one's ability to make decisions about their reproductive health. Here, we broaden this definition to consider the impact of systemic and sociocultural factors on RC using an ecological model. Specifically, we use Bronfenbrenner's model as a framework for organizing the multilevel factors that influence reproductive coercion (RC) and its impacts on individual health. This paper is intended to offer a primer to historical, sociocultural, community, interpersonal, and individual processes that may interact to shape reproductive decision-making and its effect on individual health outcomes. We emphasize the importance of conceptualizing RC within the broader sociocultural and community context, and the potential implications for reproductive and sexual health research, clinical care, and policy in the United States.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会文化背景下的生殖强迫:美国研究、实践和政策的生态模型。
生殖强迫可以被定义为限制一个人就其生殖健康作出决定的能力的任何行为。在这里,我们扩大了这一定义,使用生态模型考虑系统和社会文化因素对RC的影响。具体而言,我们使用Bronfenbrenner的模型作为组织影响生殖强迫(RC)及其对个体健康影响的多层次因素的框架。本文旨在为历史、社会文化、社区、人际关系和个人过程提供基础,这些过程可能相互作用,形成生殖决策及其对个人健康结果的影响。我们强调在更广泛的社会文化和社区背景下概念化生殖健康的重要性,以及对美国生殖健康和性健康研究、临床护理和政策的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Correction. Presidential Editorial. The Detection of Invalid Responses Using the Dissociative Experiences Scale-V (DES-V). Dissociative Experiences Among Transgender Women: A Phenomenological Study. A Virtual Reality Simulation to Examine the Relationship Between Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms and Decision-Making in First Responders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1