Visual Complexity of Head-Up Display in Automobiles Modulates Attentional Tunneling.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-08 DOI:10.1177/00187208231181496
Jieun Lee, Nahyun Lee, Jangkyu Ju, Jihwan Chae, Jiyoon Park, Hoe Sung Ryu, Yang Seok Cho
{"title":"Visual Complexity of Head-Up Display in Automobiles Modulates Attentional Tunneling.","authors":"Jieun Lee, Nahyun Lee, Jangkyu Ju, Jihwan Chae, Jiyoon Park, Hoe Sung Ryu, Yang Seok Cho","doi":"10.1177/00187208231181496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate how the visual complexity of head-up displays (HUDs) influence the allocation of driver's attention in two separate visual domains (near and far domains).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The types and amount of information displayed on automobile HUDs have increased. With limited human attention capacity, increased visual complexity in the near domain may lead to interference in the effective processing of information in the far domain.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Near-domain and far-domain vision were separately tested using a dual-task paradigm. In a simulated road environment, 62 participants were to control the speed of the vehicle (SMT; near domain) and manually respond to probes (PDT; far domain) simultaneously. Five HUD complexity levels including a HUD-absent condition were presented block-wise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Near domain performance was not modulated by the HUD complexity levels. However, the far domain detection accuracies were impaired as the HUD complexity level increased, with greater accuracy differences observed between central and peripheral probes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased HUD visual complexity leads to a biased deployment of driver attention toward the central visual field. Therefore, the formulation of HUD designs must be preceded by an in-depth investigation of the dynamics of human cognition.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>To ensure driving safety, HUD designs should be rendered with minimal visual complexity by incorporating only essential information relevant to driving and removing driving-irrelevant or additional visual details.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"1879-1892"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208231181496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate how the visual complexity of head-up displays (HUDs) influence the allocation of driver's attention in two separate visual domains (near and far domains).

Background: The types and amount of information displayed on automobile HUDs have increased. With limited human attention capacity, increased visual complexity in the near domain may lead to interference in the effective processing of information in the far domain.

Method: Near-domain and far-domain vision were separately tested using a dual-task paradigm. In a simulated road environment, 62 participants were to control the speed of the vehicle (SMT; near domain) and manually respond to probes (PDT; far domain) simultaneously. Five HUD complexity levels including a HUD-absent condition were presented block-wise.

Results: Near domain performance was not modulated by the HUD complexity levels. However, the far domain detection accuracies were impaired as the HUD complexity level increased, with greater accuracy differences observed between central and peripheral probes.

Conclusion: Increased HUD visual complexity leads to a biased deployment of driver attention toward the central visual field. Therefore, the formulation of HUD designs must be preceded by an in-depth investigation of the dynamics of human cognition.

Application: To ensure driving safety, HUD designs should be rendered with minimal visual complexity by incorporating only essential information relevant to driving and removing driving-irrelevant or additional visual details.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
汽车抬头显示器的视觉复杂性会调节注意力隧道效应。
目的:研究平视显示器(HUD)的视觉复杂性如何影响驾驶员在两个不同视觉域(近域和远域)的注意力分配:研究平视显示器(HUD)的视觉复杂性如何影响驾驶员在两个不同视觉域(近域和远域)的注意力分配:背景:汽车平视显示器上显示的信息种类和数量不断增加。在人类注意力有限的情况下,近域视觉复杂性的增加可能会干扰远域信息的有效处理:方法:采用双任务范式分别测试近域和远域视觉。在模拟道路环境中,62 名参与者要同时控制车速(SMT;近域)和手动响应探针(PDT;远域)。五个 HUD 复杂程度(包括 HUD 不存在的条件)按区块排列:结果:近域性能不受 HUD 复杂程度的影响。然而,随着 HUD 复杂程度的增加,远域检测的准确性受到了影响,在中央和外围探测器之间观察到了更大的准确性差异:结论:增加 HUD 视觉复杂度会导致驾驶员的注意力偏向中央视野。因此,在设计 HUD 之前,必须深入研究人类认知的动态变化:应用:为确保驾驶安全,HUD 设计应尽量减少视觉复杂性,只纳入与驾驶相关的基本信息,去除与驾驶无关的或额外的视觉细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Attentional Tunneling in Pilots During a Visual Tracking Task With a Head Mounted Display. Examining Patterns and Predictors of ADHD Teens' Skill-Learning Trajectories During Enhanced FOrward Concentration and Attention Learning (FOCAL+) Training. Is Less Sometimes More? An Experimental Comparison of Four Measures of Perceived Usability. An Automobile's Tail Lights: Sacrificing Safety for Playful Design? Virtual Reality Adaptive Training for Personalized Stress Inoculation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1