Differences in Coracohumeral Distance Between the Symptomatic and the Asymptomatic Shoulder in Patients With Unilateral Shoulder Pain and in Healthy Participants: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.10.004
Santiago Navarro-Ledesma PhD , Manuel Fernandez-Sanchez PhD , Filip Struyf PhD , Alejandro Luque-Suarez PhD
{"title":"Differences in Coracohumeral Distance Between the Symptomatic and the Asymptomatic Shoulder in Patients With Unilateral Shoulder Pain and in Healthy Participants: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Santiago Navarro-Ledesma PhD ,&nbsp;Manuel Fernandez-Sanchez PhD ,&nbsp;Filip Struyf PhD ,&nbsp;Alejandro Luque-Suarez PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this study was to analyze whether differences in the coracohumeral distance (CHD) exist between the symptomatic and the asymptomatic shoulder in patients with subacromial pain syndrome and compare with the shoulder of control participants.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This was a cross-sectional, observational study. A sample comprising 62 participants with subacromial pain syndrome was recruited from 3 different primary care centers. The CHD was determined from standardized </span>ultrasonography measures performed on both shoulders at 0° and 60° of shoulder abduction, whereas the dominant arm was measured for the control participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Statistically significant differences in CHD at 0° and 60° were found between the symptomatic and control shoulders (<em>P</em> = .011/<em>P</em><span> = .002) and between the contralateral asymptomatic shoulder and controls (</span><em>P</em> = .026/<em>P</em> = .007).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We found differences in CHD at 0° and 60° of shoulder elevation between both the affected and the nonaffected shoulders when compared with healthy shoulders. These results suggest that CHD may be a contributing factor in chronic shoulder pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475422001415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to analyze whether differences in the coracohumeral distance (CHD) exist between the symptomatic and the asymptomatic shoulder in patients with subacromial pain syndrome and compare with the shoulder of control participants.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional, observational study. A sample comprising 62 participants with subacromial pain syndrome was recruited from 3 different primary care centers. The CHD was determined from standardized ultrasonography measures performed on both shoulders at 0° and 60° of shoulder abduction, whereas the dominant arm was measured for the control participants.

Results

Statistically significant differences in CHD at 0° and 60° were found between the symptomatic and control shoulders (P = .011/P = .002) and between the contralateral asymptomatic shoulder and controls (P = .026/P = .007).

Conclusion

We found differences in CHD at 0° and 60° of shoulder elevation between both the affected and the nonaffected shoulders when compared with healthy shoulders. These results suggest that CHD may be a contributing factor in chronic shoulder pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单侧肩关节疼痛患者和健康人群中有症状和无症状肩关节距离的差异:一项横断面研究
目的分析肩峰下疼痛综合征患者有症状和无症状肩胛距离(CHD)是否存在差异,并与对照组进行比较。方法本研究为横断面观察性研究。从3个不同的初级保健中心招募了62名肩峰下疼痛综合征患者。CHD是通过在肩关节外展0°和60°时对双肩进行标准化超声检查来确定的,而对照参与者的优势臂是通过测量来确定的。结果有症状肩胛骨与对照组肩胛骨0°和60°时冠心病发生率差异有统计学意义(P = 0.011 /P = 0.002),对侧无症状肩胛骨与对照组肩胛骨0°和60°时冠心病发生率差异有统计学意义(P = 0.026 /P = 0.007)。结论与健康肩关节相比,受累与未受累肩关节在肩关节抬高0°和60°处的冠心病发生率存在差异。这些结果表明冠心病可能是导致慢性肩痛的一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world. The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Chiropractic Intervention on Oculomotor and Attentional Visual Outcomes in Young Adults With Long-Term Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Influence of instructions and expectations in pain perception on pupil diameter and the cognitive assessment of pain. Effects of Cervical Mobilization on Balance and Proprioception in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain. Influence of Changing Hip Position on Electromyographic Activities of Selected Trunk Muscles During Bridging Exercises in Healthy Subjects: A Cross-Sectional Study. Influence of Physical Characteristics of Obstacles on the Locomotor Pattern of Older Adults at Higher Risk of Falling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1