Ultrasound diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis – Time to change the criteria

Lino Piotto, Roger Gent, Ajay Taranath, Giovanni Bibbo, Day Way Goh
{"title":"Ultrasound diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis – Time to change the criteria","authors":"Lino Piotto,&nbsp;Roger Gent,&nbsp;Ajay Taranath,&nbsp;Giovanni Bibbo,&nbsp;Day Way Goh","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Ultrasound is the examination of choice for the diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS). A correct diagnosis is dependent on the technique and measurement accuracy. However, in the world literature there is a wide range of values suggested for the diagnosis of this condition. The current minimum measurements used to diagnose HPS seem excessively large, and therefore, we set out to redefine these values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective study was performed on 607 patients (615 scans) being investigated for HPS. The length and transverse diameter of the pyloric canal, and thickness of the pyloric muscle were measured. All results were correlated with clinical and surgical findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, the muscle thickness in the normal group was &lt;2.0 mm than in HPS infants having a muscle thickness of 2.0–5.0 mm. All the pyloric canal lengths in the normal group were &lt;5.0 mm than in those with HPS having a length of 10.0–24.0 mm. The transverse diameters ranged from 6.0 to 11.0 mm in the normal group compared with those with HPS having a diameter between 8.0 and 16.0 mm.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The current criteria for sonographic diagnosis of HPS should be redefined. The canal length is the single most important discriminator, with a clear separation between normal and abnormal. The commonly used 16.0-mm measurement is too long and should be reduced to 10.0 mm (without the risk of false positives). In many cases, the muscle thickness in those with HPS is as low as 2.0 mm, considerably less than the 3.0 mm that is currently used. The transverse diameter is not a useful discriminator for HPS. The use of current values will delay the diagnosis and timely treatment of this condition.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"25 3","pages":"116-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351432/pdf/AJUM-25-116.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.12305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction

Ultrasound is the examination of choice for the diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS). A correct diagnosis is dependent on the technique and measurement accuracy. However, in the world literature there is a wide range of values suggested for the diagnosis of this condition. The current minimum measurements used to diagnose HPS seem excessively large, and therefore, we set out to redefine these values.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on 607 patients (615 scans) being investigated for HPS. The length and transverse diameter of the pyloric canal, and thickness of the pyloric muscle were measured. All results were correlated with clinical and surgical findings.

Results

In this study, the muscle thickness in the normal group was <2.0 mm than in HPS infants having a muscle thickness of 2.0–5.0 mm. All the pyloric canal lengths in the normal group were <5.0 mm than in those with HPS having a length of 10.0–24.0 mm. The transverse diameters ranged from 6.0 to 11.0 mm in the normal group compared with those with HPS having a diameter between 8.0 and 16.0 mm.

Conclusions

The current criteria for sonographic diagnosis of HPS should be redefined. The canal length is the single most important discriminator, with a clear separation between normal and abnormal. The commonly used 16.0-mm measurement is too long and should be reduced to 10.0 mm (without the risk of false positives). In many cases, the muscle thickness in those with HPS is as low as 2.0 mm, considerably less than the 3.0 mm that is currently used. The transverse diameter is not a useful discriminator for HPS. The use of current values will delay the diagnosis and timely treatment of this condition.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声诊断肥厚性幽门狭窄-是时候改变标准了
超声是诊断肥厚性幽门狭窄(HPS)的首选检查。正确的诊断取决于技术和测量精度。然而,在世界文献中,对于这种疾病的诊断有广泛的价值建议。目前用于诊断HPS的最小测量值似乎过大,因此,我们开始重新定义这些值。方法对607例HPS患者(615次扫描)进行回顾性研究。测量幽门管长度、横径、幽门肌厚度。所有结果均与临床和手术结果相关。结果在本研究中,正常组的肌肉厚度比HPS组的肌肉厚度(2.0 - 5.0 mm)大2.0 mm。正常组幽门管长度均为5.0 mm,而HPS组幽门管长度为10.0 ~ 24.0 mm。正常组的横径为6.0 ~ 11.0 mm,而HPS组的横径为8.0 ~ 16.0 mm。结论HPS的超声诊断标准应重新定义。根管长度是唯一最重要的鉴别指标,正常和异常之间有明确的区分。常用的16.0毫米测量太长,应减少到10.0毫米(没有假阳性的风险)。在许多情况下,HPS患者的肌肉厚度低至2.0毫米,远低于目前使用的3.0毫米。横向直径不是一个有用的判别HPS。电流值的使用会延误这种情况的诊断和及时治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The impact of ultrasound imaging on patient management – Let's practice the evidence EUS‐guided tissue acquisition from gastric subepithelial lesions—The optimal technique still remains undecided Ultrasound‐assisted and landmark‐based nusinersen delivery in spinal muscular atrophy adults: A retrospective analysis Cutaneous ultrasound in the diagnosis and assessment of inflammatory activity in tinea capitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1