Stress exposure, hand preference, and hand skill: A deep phenotyping approach.

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Laterality Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1080/1357650X.2023.2204551
Annakarina Mundorf, Stephan Getzmann, Patrick D Gajewski, Mauro F Larra, Edmund Wascher, Sebastian Ocklenburg
{"title":"Stress exposure, hand preference, and hand skill: A deep phenotyping approach.","authors":"Annakarina Mundorf,&nbsp;Stephan Getzmann,&nbsp;Patrick D Gajewski,&nbsp;Mauro F Larra,&nbsp;Edmund Wascher,&nbsp;Sebastian Ocklenburg","doi":"10.1080/1357650X.2023.2204551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>Stress exposure and reactivity may show differential associations with handedness, but shallow phenotyping may influence the current knowledge. Importantly, different handedness measures do not necessarily show high correlations with each other and should not be used interchangeably as they may reflect different dimensions of laterality. Here, data on handedness from 599 participants in the population-based, longitudinal Dortmund Vital Study was used to determine various asymmetry indices. Hand preference was assessed with the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI) and the lateral preference inventory (LPI) measuring handedness, footedness, earedness, and eyedness. Hand performance was determined using the pegboard test. In addition, data on several dimensions of stress exposure and reactivity, including hair cortisol, and mental well-being was analysed to determine associations with handedness. All handedness measures correlated significantly with each other, with the strongest correlation between the EHI and the LPI handedness score. The EHI and LPI hand measures resulted in the highest effect sizes and most consistent correlations with stress or mental well-being. In contrast, the pegboard test only showed very little association with the stress and mental well-being measures. This highlights the importance of handedness phenotyping. Including preference measures is recommended to disentangle the link between handedness and mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":47387,"journal":{"name":"Laterality","volume":"28 2-3","pages":"209-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laterality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2023.2204551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACTStress exposure and reactivity may show differential associations with handedness, but shallow phenotyping may influence the current knowledge. Importantly, different handedness measures do not necessarily show high correlations with each other and should not be used interchangeably as they may reflect different dimensions of laterality. Here, data on handedness from 599 participants in the population-based, longitudinal Dortmund Vital Study was used to determine various asymmetry indices. Hand preference was assessed with the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI) and the lateral preference inventory (LPI) measuring handedness, footedness, earedness, and eyedness. Hand performance was determined using the pegboard test. In addition, data on several dimensions of stress exposure and reactivity, including hair cortisol, and mental well-being was analysed to determine associations with handedness. All handedness measures correlated significantly with each other, with the strongest correlation between the EHI and the LPI handedness score. The EHI and LPI hand measures resulted in the highest effect sizes and most consistent correlations with stress or mental well-being. In contrast, the pegboard test only showed very little association with the stress and mental well-being measures. This highlights the importance of handedness phenotyping. Including preference measures is recommended to disentangle the link between handedness and mental health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
压力暴露,手偏好和手技能:一种深度表型方法。
摘要压力暴露和反应性可能显示出与手性的不同关联,但浅层表型可能影响当前的知识。重要的是,不同的手性测量不一定显示出彼此之间的高度相关性,也不应该互换使用,因为它们可能反映了不同的侧性维度。在这里,来自599名参与者的以人群为基础的,纵向多特蒙德生命研究的数据被用来确定各种不对称指数。用爱丁堡利手性量表(EHI)和测量利手性、足性、耳性和眼性的横向偏好量表(LPI)来评估手性偏好。使用钉板测试确定了手性能。此外,还分析了压力暴露和反应性的几个维度的数据,包括毛发皮质醇和心理健康,以确定与惯用手的关系。所有的手性测量结果彼此之间都有显著的相关性,其中EHI和LPI的手性得分之间的相关性最强。EHI和LPI手部测量结果的效应值最高,与压力或心理健康的相关性也最一致。相比之下,钉板测试只显示出与压力和心理健康测量的很少关联。这突出了利手性表型的重要性。建议包括偏好测量,以理清利手与心理健康之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laterality
Laterality Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition publishes high quality research on all aspects of lateralisation in humans and non-human species. Laterality"s principal interest is in the psychological, behavioural and neurological correlates of lateralisation. The editors will also consider accessible papers from any discipline which can illuminate the general problems of the evolution of biological and neural asymmetry, papers on the cultural, linguistic, artistic and social consequences of lateral asymmetry, and papers on its historical origins and development. The interests of workers in laterality are typically broad.
期刊最新文献
Auditory perceptual ability affects dichotic listening performance in older adults. The effect of ocular dominance on choroidal structures. Artistic turns: laterality in paintings of kisses and embraces A task-dependent analysis of closed vs. open and fine vs. gross motor skills in handedness. Fear is more right lateralized than happiness and anger: Evidence for the motivational hypothesis of emotional face perception?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1